On the use of the 'Return Of Safety Investments' (ROSI) measure for decision-making in the chemical processing industry

被引:12
|
作者
Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim [1 ]
Selvik, Jon Tommeras [1 ]
Milazzo, Maria Francesca [2 ]
Langdalen, Henrik [1 ]
Dahl, Roy Endre [1 ]
Bansal, Surbhi [1 ]
Abrahamsen, Hakon Bjorheim [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stavanger, Dept Safety Econ & Planning, Stavanger, Norway
[2] Univ Messina, Dept Engn, Messina, Italy
[3] Stavanger Univ Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, Stavanger, Norway
关键词
Expected values; Return of Investments in safety; Chemical industry; Uncertainty; Strength of Knowledge; MANAGEMENT; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2021.107537
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Due to the high potential of chemical and process industry to damage people, as well as to cause environmental contamination, there is a need of objective criteria and methods supporting plant operators to make decisions and optimise investments in safety measures. Currently, the use of risk-based approaches is popular in order to prioritize criticalities, based on the results of risk assessments; this approach is usually combined with cost-benefit analyses that provide criterions in the decision-making process. A commonly used framework to prioritise safety measures is based on the calculation of the return of safety investments (ROSI), which quantifies the expected return of the investment in safety with respect to the invested resources. In this paper the usefulness of such a framework is discussed and the need for an extension is shown using a case-study from the chemical processing industry. The study concluded that the ROSI should be used with caution, because it does not give a sufficient weight to uncertainties as it is based on the use of expected values. Some improvements to the framework are suggested, i.e. the assessment of ROSI given an accidental event and to highlight the importance of reflecting the strength of knowledge on which the ROSI metric is based.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prioritising investments in safety measures in the chemical industry by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim
    Milazzo, Maria Francesca
    Selvik, Jon T.
    Asche, Frank
    Abrahamsen, Hakon Bjorheim
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2020, 198
  • [2] Development of a Safety Decision-Making Scenario to Measure Worker Safety in Agriculture
    Mosher, G. A.
    Keren, N.
    Freeman, S. A.
    Hurburgh, C. R., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SAFETY AND HEALTH, 2014, 20 (02): : 91 - 107
  • [3] An integrated decision-making approach for sustainable supplier selection in the chemical industry
    Wu, Chong
    Lin, Yang
    Barnes, David
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 184
  • [5] Strategic decision-making in the pharmaceutical industry: A unified decision-making framework
    Marques, Catarina M.
    Moniz, Samuel
    de Sousa, Jorge Pinho
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 119 : 171 - 189
  • [6] Decision-making and safety in anesthesiology
    Stiegler, Marjorie P.
    Ruskin, Keith J.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2012, 25 (06) : 724 - 729
  • [7] Use of decision criteria based on expected values to support decision-making in a production assurance and safety setting
    Aven, T.
    Flage, R.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2009, 94 (09) : 1491 - 1498
  • [8] THE USE OF RISK IN DECISION-MAKING
    SILBERFELD, M
    CANADIAN JOURNAL ON AGING-REVUE CANADIENNE DU VIEILLISSEMENT, 1992, 11 (02): : 124 - 136
  • [9] Investments in Innovative Urban Sanitation - Decision-Making Processes in Sweden
    Lennartsson, Maria
    McConville, Jennifer
    Kvarnstrom, Elisabeth
    Hagman, Marinette
    Kjerstadius, Hamse
    WATER ALTERNATIVES-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL ON WATER POLITICS AND DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 12 (02): : 588 - 608
  • [10] Transmission Investments under Uncertainty: the Impact of Flexibility on Decision-Making
    Blanco, Gerardo
    Olsina, Fernando
    Garces, Francisco
    2012 IEEE POWER AND ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, 2012,