Promoting wastewater treatment in India: Critical questions of economic viability

被引:7
作者
Bassi, Nitin [1 ]
Kumar, Saurabh [2 ]
Kumar, M. Dinesh [2 ]
Van Ermen, Sofie [3 ]
Campling, Paul [3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Resource Anal & Policy IRAP, Now Council Energy Environm & Water CEEW, Delhi, India
[2] Inst Resource Anal & Policy IRAP, Hyderabad, India
[3] Flemish Inst Technol Res VITONV, Environm Modelling Unit, Mol, Belgium
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
economic viability; environmental benefits; life cycle cost assessment; social benefits; wastewater treatment technologies; water reuse; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; DECISION-SUPPORT TOOL; TREATMENT SYSTEMS; SMALL COMMUNITIES; TREATMENT PLANTS; TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES; TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES; SELECTION; MANAGEMENT; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1111/wej.12810
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The article shows that while there is rich literature on the cost-effectiveness of wastewater treatment systems, little analysis exists on their economic viability that goes beyond direct benefits and costs to include externalities, which is very crucial for developing countries like India. This article first presents the results of life cycle cost assessment of various wastewater treatment technologies used in India. The article then shows that the direct benefits from treated wastewater are unlikely to be high in most situations due to lack of orientation towards the demand. It argues that for sustainable investments in wastewater treatment, the indirect benefits including public health benefits due to protection of drinking water sources, environmental benefits due to maintenance of aquatic life and improvement of soil health, which are determined by the socio-economic and ecological conditions that vary across regions, should also be considered and quantified.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 736
页数:14
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [1] Epidemiological Evidence and Health Risks Associated With Agricultural Reuse of Partially Treated and Untreated Wastewater: A Review
    Adegoke, Anthony A.
    Amoah, Isaac D.
    Stenstrom, Thor A.
    Verbyla, Matthew E.
    Mihelcic, James R.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 6
  • [2] Akpor O.B., 2011, 2011 3rd International Conference on Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering, V20, P85
  • [3] Financing for WaterWater for Financing: A Global Review of Policy and Practice
    Alaerts, Guy J.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (03)
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1991, OFFICIAL J EUROPEAN
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2013, Performance Evaluation of Sewage Treatment Plants under NRCD
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2006, Policy and Regulatory Aspects
  • [7] Selecting appropriate wastewater treatment technologies using a choosing-by-advantages approach
    Arroyo, Paz
    Molinos-Senante, Maria
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 625 : 819 - 827
  • [8] Sustainable wastewater management for small communities in the Middle East and North Africa
    Bakir, HA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2001, 61 (04) : 319 - 328
  • [9] Status of wetlands in India: A review of extent, ecosystem benefits, threats and management strategies
    Bassi, Nitin
    Kumar, M. Dinesh
    Sharma, Anuradha
    Pardha-Saradhi, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES, 2014, 2 : 1 - 19
  • [10] From removal to recovery: An evaluation of nitrogen recovery techniques from wastewater
    Beckinghausen, Aubrey
    Odlare, Monica
    Thorin, Eva
    Schwede, Sebastian
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 263