Optimizing screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) training for nurses and social workers: Testing the added effect of online patient simulation

被引:12
|
作者
O'Brien, Kimberly H. McManama [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Putney, Jennifer M. [4 ]
Collin, Cali-Ryan R. [4 ]
Halmo, Rebekah S. [4 ]
Cadet, Tamara J. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Educ Dev Ctr, Dept Hlth Promot Practice & Innovat, Waltham, MA USA
[2] Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Psychiat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Simmons Univ, Sch Social Work, Boston, MA USA
[5] Harvard Sch Dent Med, Boston, MA USA
关键词
education; nursing; SBIRT; social work; technology; ALCOHOL; EDUCATION; CARE;
D O I
10.1080/08897077.2019.1576087
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Social workers and nurses are critical to the amelioration of substance misuse, making their training in evidence-based practices such as screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) particularly pertinent. Online patient simulation (OPS) is one training modality that allows students to develop and practice SBIRT skills that they might not obtain through didactic instruction, but it can be time and resource intensive. The aim of this study was to test the effect of OPS, over and above in-person training, on students' SBIRT attitudes, knowledge, and perceived skills. Methods: Social work and nursing students (N = 308) were recruited from a college in the northeastern United States. Students in the study were randomly assigned to either training as usual (TAU), which included pre-coursework videos, in-person didactic instruction, and role-plays, or the experimental condition (EXP), consisting of TAU plus access to self-paced SBIRT skills practice using OPS by SIMmersion. The SBIRT Attitudes, Self-perception of Skills, and Knowledge (AKS) survey was delivered at baseline, immediately post-training, and at 30-day follow-up (post-30) to assess overall changes as well as changes in the specific domains of SBIRT confidence, importance, and attitudes. Paired t tests were conducted to determine differences in mean scores between time points for the entire sample. Independent-samples t tests were conducted to test differences between EXP and TAU on AKS scores at each time point and to test differences between high and low OPS use. Results: Results showed a significant difference from pre- to post-training on composite AKS scores. There were no significant differences between TAU and EXP in composite scores or by AKS domain, and no differences within the EXP group for those with high and low use. Conclusions: Participants in EXP did not have significantly increased AKS scores, demonstrating that access to OPS did not produce an additive effect on the acquisition of self-perceived SBIRT knowledge, attitudes, and skills.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 488
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Using SBIRT (Screen, Brief Intervention, and Referral Treatment) Training to Reduce the Stigmatization of Substance Use Disorders Among Students and Practitioners
    Gomez, Efren
    Gyger, Matthew
    Borene, Stephanie
    Klein-Cox, Amanda
    Denby, Ramona
    Hunt, Sara
    Sida, Oscar
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE-RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2023, 17
  • [32] Evaluating Training of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) for Substance Use: Reliability of the MD3 SBIRT Coding Scale
    DiClemente, Carlo C.
    Crouch, Taylor Berens
    Norwood, Amber E. Q.
    Delahanty, Janine
    Welsh, Christopher
    PSYCHOLOGY OF ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2015, 29 (01) : 218 - 224
  • [33] Outcomes and lessons learned from an interprofessional student training program in Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) at an academic health sciences center
    Gainey, Sarah
    Muzzy, Wendy
    Dooley, Mary
    Lauerer, Joy
    Pelic, Christopher
    Rheingold, Alyssa A.
    Holmes-Maybank, Keri
    Smith, Gigi
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2022, 111
  • [34] Integrating Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) into an abortion clinic: an exploratory study of acceptability
    Appel, Lindsay
    Ramanadhan, Shaalini
    Hladky, Katherine
    Welsh, Chris
    Terplan, Mishka
    CONTRACEPTION, 2015, 91 (04) : 350 - 352
  • [35] Integrating Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) into Clinical Practice Settings: A Brief Review
    Agerwala, Suneel M.
    McCance-Katz, Elinore F.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOACTIVE DRUGS, 2012, 44 (04) : 307 - 317
  • [36] South Texas Residency Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) Training: 12-Month Outcomes
    Malone, Glenn P.
    Arismendez, Shruthi Vale
    Warzinski, Suyen Schneegans
    Amodei, Nancy
    Burge, Sandra K.
    Wathen, Patricia I.
    Conde, Michelle V.
    Palmer, Raymond
    Williams, Janet F.
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2015, 36 (03) : 272 - 280
  • [37] Evaluation of a Pilot Training Program in Alcohol Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment for Nurses in Inpatient Settings
    Broyles, Lauren M.
    Gordon, Adam J.
    Rodriguez, Keri L.
    Hanusa, Barbara H.
    Kengor, Caroline
    Kraemer, Kevin L.
    JOURNAL OF ADDICTIONS NURSING, 2013, 24 (01) : 8 - 19
  • [38] Implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) Training in Large Cohorts of Second Year Medical Students
    Willms, Joshua
    Popp, Lisa
    Jones, Betsy G.
    Babb, Franklyn
    Cook, Ronal
    Nedumaran, Shruthiranjani
    Littlefield, Andrew K.
    Trotter, David
    ALCOHOLISM TREATMENT QUARTERLY, 2022, 40 (01) : 22 - 34
  • [39] Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) curriculum integration and sustainability: Social work and nursing faculty perspectives
    Belfiore, M. Nicole
    Blinka, Marcela D.
    BrintzenhofeSzoc, Karlynn
    Shields, Joseph
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2018, 39 (02) : 255 - 261
  • [40] Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) training reduces stigma and prepares orthopaedic providers to identify and intervene in opioid misuse: a prospective cohort study
    Mierisch, Cassandra
    Hartman, Cheryl
    Quinn, Caleb
    Hartman, David
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2022, 33 (02): : 126 - 133