Regulatory Lag, Regulatory Friction and Regulatory Transition as FinTech Disenablers: Calibrating an EU Response to the Regulatory Sandbox Phenomenon

被引:33
作者
Ahern, Deirdre [1 ]
机构
[1] Trinity Coll Dublin, Technol Law & Soc Res Grp, Sch Law, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
FinTech; Regulatory sandbox; EU financial services law; Digital finance; Initial coin offerings; Crypto-assets; Crowdfunding; EUROPEAN-UNION; SECURITIES; TECHNOLOGY; COMPETITION; GOVERNANCE; ARBITRAGE;
D O I
10.1007/s40804-021-00217-z
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
With transformative evolution involving crypto-assets, machine learning applications and data-driven finance models, complex regulatory and policy issues are emerging. Inadequate frameworks in FinTech markets create regulatory friction and regulatory fragmentation. These limitations continue to feature when piecemeal regulatory transition occurs. The danger of EU Member States being left behind in the FinTech innovation race if the regulatory landscape is cumbersome or incomplete for new business models is real. Regulatory lag and regulatory friction also act as a 'disenabler' for ease of cross-border FinTech trade in the EU. This article critically engages with the manner in which the regulatory sandbox has rapidly gained critical mass in Member States as a valuable adaptive measure supporting a route to market for FinTech entrepreneurs. Against the backdrop of the European Commission's Digital Finance Strategy, the article further advances scholarship on FinTech in the EU by probing the EU's resulting regulatory dilemma, undertaking a systematic evaluation of the continuum of complex policy options available to the European Union in response to the spreading regulatory sandbox phenomenon.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 432
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Digital sovereignty and taking back control: from regulatory capitalism to regulatory mercantilism in EU cybersecurity [J].
Farrand, Benjamin ;
Carrapico, Helena .
EUROPEAN SECURITY, 2022, 31 (03) :435-453
[32]   Exporting standards: The externalization of the EU's regulatory power via markets [J].
Bradford, Anu .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2015, 42 :158-173
[33]   Fintech adoption, the regulatory environment and bank stability: An empirical investigation from GCC economies [J].
Khan, Habib Hussain ;
Khan, Shoaib ;
Ghafoor, Abdul .
BORSA ISTANBUL REVIEW, 2023, 23 (06) :1263-1281
[34]   How the EU Counters Disinformation: Journalistic and Regulatory Responses [J].
Navarro, Jorge Tunon ;
Garcia, Luis Bouza ;
Oleart, Alvaro .
MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION, 2025, 13
[35]   Time for a New EU Regulatory Framework for GM Crops? [J].
Zetterberg, Charlotta ;
Bjornberg, Karin Edvardsson .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2017, 30 (03) :325-347
[36]   The EU regulatory framework on genetically modified organisms (GMOs) [J].
Bruetschy, Chantal .
TRANSGENIC RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (Suppl 2) :169-174
[37]   The EU Regulatory Action in the Shipping Sector: A Historical Perspective [J].
Bernardo Urrutia .
Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2006, 8 (2) :202-221
[38]   Pooling administrative resources through EU regulatory networks [J].
Vestlund, Nina M. .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2017, 24 (01) :61-80
[39]   The EU regulatory framework on genetically modified organisms (GMOs) [J].
Chantal Bruetschy .
Transgenic Research, 2019, 28 :169-174
[40]   Regulatory Evolution of the EU Credit Rating Agency Framework [J].
Wittenberg, Tim .
EUROPEAN BUSINESS ORGANIZATION LAW REVIEW, 2015, 16 (04) :669-709