Regulatory Lag, Regulatory Friction and Regulatory Transition as FinTech Disenablers: Calibrating an EU Response to the Regulatory Sandbox Phenomenon

被引:33
作者
Ahern, Deirdre [1 ]
机构
[1] Trinity Coll Dublin, Technol Law & Soc Res Grp, Sch Law, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
FinTech; Regulatory sandbox; EU financial services law; Digital finance; Initial coin offerings; Crypto-assets; Crowdfunding; EUROPEAN-UNION; SECURITIES; TECHNOLOGY; COMPETITION; GOVERNANCE; ARBITRAGE;
D O I
10.1007/s40804-021-00217-z
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
With transformative evolution involving crypto-assets, machine learning applications and data-driven finance models, complex regulatory and policy issues are emerging. Inadequate frameworks in FinTech markets create regulatory friction and regulatory fragmentation. These limitations continue to feature when piecemeal regulatory transition occurs. The danger of EU Member States being left behind in the FinTech innovation race if the regulatory landscape is cumbersome or incomplete for new business models is real. Regulatory lag and regulatory friction also act as a 'disenabler' for ease of cross-border FinTech trade in the EU. This article critically engages with the manner in which the regulatory sandbox has rapidly gained critical mass in Member States as a valuable adaptive measure supporting a route to market for FinTech entrepreneurs. Against the backdrop of the European Commission's Digital Finance Strategy, the article further advances scholarship on FinTech in the EU by probing the EU's resulting regulatory dilemma, undertaking a systematic evaluation of the continuum of complex policy options available to the European Union in response to the spreading regulatory sandbox phenomenon.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 432
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Fintech, regulatory arbitrage, and the rise of shadow banks [J].
Buchak, Greg ;
Matvos, Gregor ;
Piskorski, Tomasz ;
Seru, Amit .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 130 (03) :453-483
[22]   Regulatory sandboxes and innovation hubs for FinTech: experiences of the Baltic states [J].
Raudla, Ringa ;
Juuse, Egert ;
Kuokstis, Vytautas ;
Cepilovs, Aleksandrs ;
Douglas, James W. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2024,
[23]   THE REGULATORY MODEL OF ENERGY SERVICES' GOVERNANCE IN THE EU [J].
Andreeva, Lyubimka Markova .
VOPROSY GOSUDARSTVENNOGO I MUNITSIPALNOGO UPRAVLENIYA-PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ISSUES, 2018, (05) :21-42
[24]   Demystifying the proliferation of online peer-to-peer lending in Indonesia: Decoding fintech as a regulatory challenge [J].
Tan, David .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND SOCIETY, 2023, 10 (03) :376-400
[25]   MECHANISMS OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT IN EU REGULATORY POLICY [J].
Eberlein, Burkard ;
Radaelli, Claudio M. .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2010, 88 (03) :782-799
[26]   Functional stakes and EU regulatory governance: temporal patterns of regulatory integration in energy and telecommunications [J].
Mathieu, Emmanuelle .
WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2020, 43 (04) :991-1010
[27]   FinTech Development and Regulatory Scrutiny: A Contradiction? The Case of Latvia [J].
Rupeika-Apoga, Ramona ;
Wendt, Stefan .
RISKS, 2022, 10 (09)
[28]   Regulatory Challenges and Mitigation for Account Services Offered by FinTech [J].
Mahalle, Abhishek ;
Yong, Jianming ;
Tao, Xiaohui .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 IEEE 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK IN DESIGN (CSCWD), 2021, :280-287
[29]   Technology entrepreneurship and innovation hubs: Perspectives on the universal regulatory sandbox [J].
Hemphill, Thomas A. .
SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2023, 50 (02) :350-353
[30]   The Effects of Public Ownership and Regulatory Independence on Regulatory OutcomesA Study of Interconnect Rates in EU Telecommunications* [J].
Geoff Edwards ;
Leonard Waverman .
Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2006, 29 :23-67