Two worlds in one city: a sociopolitical perspective on Chinese urban families' language planning

被引:38
作者
Zheng, Yongyan [1 ]
Mei, Ziwen [2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Coll Foreign Languages & Literature, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Educ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
Family language policy; language management; Chinese-English bilingual; home literacy environment; community; SOCIAL-CLASS; LITERACY PRACTICES; ENGLISH; LINGUISTICS; COMMUNITIES; SYNERGY; POLICY;
D O I
10.1080/14664208.2020.1751491
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This comparative inquiry investigated the family language planning in two distinctive socioeconomic communities in a Chinese metropolitan city. We followed a multilayered framework to probe into language beliefs, practices and management in the family domain as mediated by the interconnectivity of multiple contextual forces. We collected three types of data from governmental policy documents, field visits to two community libraries, and questionnaires from 237 residents from the two communities. Data analysis identified an early childhood language policy disfavoring English learning at the macro level, distinctive English literacy activities at the meso-community level, and similar aspirations with different management practices at the micro-family level. We argue that the observed disjuncture in English language planning between the macro and micro levels creates a space for parents as social actors to take ownership and negotiate their language planning activities at the meso level. However, although families from different socioeconomic backgrounds demonstrated similar aspirations for their children's English and Chinese development, the parents' socioeconomic status affected their ability to invest family capital in their children's language learning, and to translate their language ideologies into consistent language planning activities. Issues related to educational equity are discussed at the end of the paper.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 407
页数:25
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, PISA 2006 Technical Report, DOI 10.1787/9789264048096-en
[2]   A Transdisciplinary Framework for SLA in a Multilingual World [J].
Atkinson, Dwight ;
Byrnes, Heidi ;
Doran, Meredith ;
Duff, Patricia ;
Ellis, Nick C. ;
Hall, Joan Kelly ;
Johnson, Karen E. ;
Lantolf, James P. ;
Larsen-Freeman, Diane ;
Negueruela, Eduardo ;
Norton, Bonny ;
Ortega, Lourdes ;
Schumann, John ;
Swain, Merrill ;
Tarone, Elaine .
MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 2016, 100 :19-47
[3]   A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press [J].
Baker, Paul ;
Gabrielatos, Costas ;
Khosravinik, Majid ;
Krzyzanowski, Michal ;
Mcenery, Tony ;
Wodak, Ruth .
DISCOURSE & SOCIETY, 2008, 19 (03) :273-306
[4]   Rearticulating the Case for Micro Language Planning in a Language Ecology Context [J].
Baldauf, Richard B., Jr. .
CURRENT ISSUES IN LANGUAGE PLANNING, 2006, 7 (2-3) :147-170
[5]  
Bernardi Fabrizio., 2016, Education, Occupation and Social Origin
[6]   Political economy in applied linguistics research [J].
Block, David .
LANGUAGE TEACHING, 2017, 50 (01) :32-64
[7]   Social Class in Applied Linguistics [J].
Block, David .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2015, 35 :1-19
[8]   English in China today [J].
Bolton, Kingsley ;
Graddol, David .
ENGLISH TODAY, 2012, 28 (03) :3-9
[9]  
Bourdieu P., 1986, Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, P241
[10]  
Bray M., 2012, SHADOW ED PRIVATE SU