The effects of co-substrate and thermal pretreatment on anaerobic digestion performance

被引:14
作者
Amiri, Leyla [1 ,2 ]
Abdoli, Mohammad Ali [2 ]
Gitipour, Saeid [2 ]
Madadian, Edris [3 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Min & Mat Engn, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Tehran, Fac Environm, Dept Environm Engn, Tehran, Iran
[3] McGill Univ, Dept Bioresource Engn, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Organic fraction of municipal solid waste; leachate; sludge; anaerobic co-digestion; biogas; thermal pretreatment; kinetic study; HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; BIOGAS PRODUCTION BATCH; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; ORGANIC LOADING RATE; HEAVY-METALS; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; CO-DIGESTION; METHANE PRODUCTION; SWINE MANURE; DEGRADATION;
D O I
10.1080/09593330.2016.1260643
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The influence of anaerobic co-digestion of leachate and sludge with organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) under mesophilic condition in three batch digesters of 5L capacity has been studied. OFMSW was mixed with leachate and sludge at three different ratios. Experimental results illustrated that the digester with a ratio of 2000/2500 (leachate (mL) or sludge/OFMSW (mL)) had significantly higher performance. Furthermore, this study compared the performance of anaerobic digestion of different substrates with three different mixing ratios with and without thermal pretreatment at low temperature (65 degrees C) in terms of biogas production, chemical oxygen demand (COD) elimination as well as hydraulic retention time. In addition, to predict the biogas yield and evaluate the kinetic parameters, the modified Gompertz model was applied. Based on the results, the maximum biogas yield from adding different leachate and sludge ratios to OFMSW was recorded to be 0.45 and 0.38m(3)kg(-1) COD which was higher about 7% in comparison with co-digestion original OFMSW without thermal pretreatment. In addition, thermal pretreatment accelerated the hydrolysis step. Moreover, the total COD elimination was relatively stable in the range of 52-60% at all types of substrate mixtures. Also, the modified Gompertz model demonstrated a good fit to the experimental results.
引用
收藏
页码:2352 / 2361
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Methane Production from Anaerobic Co-digestion of maize and cow dung [J].
Abdoli, Mohammad Ali ;
Amiri, Leila ;
Baghvand, Akbar ;
Nasiri, Javad ;
Madadian, Edris .
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2014, 33 (02) :597-601
[2]  
Abduli MA, 2013, INT J ENVIRON RES, V7, P467
[3]   Determination of cadmium and lead in table salt by sequential multi-element flame atomic absorption spectrometry [J].
Amorim, FAC ;
Ferreira, SLC .
TALANTA, 2005, 65 (04) :960-964
[4]  
[Anonymous], STANDARD METHODS EXA
[5]   Influence of low temperature thermal pre-treatment on sludge solubilisation, heavy metal release and anaerobic digestion [J].
Appels, Lise ;
Degreve, Jan ;
Van der Bruggen, Bart ;
Van Impe, Jan ;
Dewil, Raf .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 101 (15) :5743-5748
[6]   Pretreatment methods to enhance anaerobic digestion of organic solid waste [J].
Ariunbaatar, Javkhlan ;
Panico, Antonio ;
Esposito, Giovanni ;
Pirozzi, Francesco ;
Lens, Piet N. L. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 123 :143-156
[7]   Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: A review [J].
Chen, Ye ;
Cheng, Jay J. ;
Creamer, Kurt S. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 99 (10) :4044-4064
[8]   Effects of thermal and mechanical pretreatments of secondary sludge on biogas production under thermophilic conditions [J].
Climent, Mavi ;
Ferrer, Ivet ;
del Mar Baeza, Ma ;
Artola, Adriana ;
Vazquez, Felicitas ;
Font, Xavier .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2007, 133 (1-3) :335-342
[9]   High-solids anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste in comparison with mono digestions: Stability and performance [J].
Dai, Xiaohu ;
Duan, Nina ;
Dong, Bin ;
Dai, Lingling .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 33 (02) :308-316
[10]   Evaluation of heavy metal content in digestate from batch anaerobic co-digestion of sunflower hulls and poultry manure [J].
Demirel, Burak ;
Gol, Nefise Pinar ;
Onay, Turgut Tuzun .
JOURNAL OF MATERIAL CYCLES AND WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 15 (02) :242-246