Integrated techno-economic and environmental assessments of sixty scenarios for co-firing biomass with coal and natural gas

被引:74
作者
Agbor, Ezinwa [1 ]
Oyedun, Adetoyese Olajire [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaolei [1 ]
Kumar, Amit [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Mech Engn, Donadeo Innovat Ctr Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Biomass co-firing; Coal; Natural gas; GHG emissions; Power generation; Techno-economic assessment; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENERGY; CAPTURE; PLANTS; FUEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.018
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Displacement of fossil fuel-based power through biomass co-firing could reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from fossil fuels. In this study, data-intensive techno-economic models were developed to evaluate different co-firing technologies as well as the configurations of these technologies. The models Were developed to study 60 different scenarios involving various biomass feedstocks (wood chips, wheat straw, and forest residues) co-fired either with coal in a 500 MW subcritical pulverized coal (PC) plant or with natural gas in a 500 MW natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) plant to determine their technical potential and costs, as well as to determine environmental benefits. The results obtained reveal that the fully paid-off coal-fired power plant co-fired with forest residues is the most attractive option, having levelized costs of electricity (LCOE) of $53.12-$54.50/MW h and CO2 abatement costs of $27.41-$31.15/tCO(2). When whole forest chips are co-fired with coal in a fully paid-off plant, the LCOE and CO2 abatement costs range from $54.68 to $56.41/MW h and $35.60 to $41.78/tCO(2), respectively. The LCOE and CO2 abatement costs for straw range from $54.62 to $57.35/MW h and $35.07 to $38.48/tCO(2), respectively. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 449
页数:17
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [21] Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems, 2013, LEV COST EL REN EN T
  • [22] Granatstein D. L., 2002, CASE STUDY LAHDEN LA, V36
  • [23] IEA-ETSAP IRENA, 2013, BIOM COF
  • [24] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2011, SPEC REP REN EN SOUR
  • [25] Jiang D, 2009, INT C SUST POW GEN S
  • [26] Economics of co-firing coal and biomass: An application to Western Canada
    Johnston, Craig M. T.
    van Kooten, G. Cornelis
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2015, 48 : 7 - 17
  • [27] Comparison of the energy and environmental performances of nine biomass/coal co-firing pathways
    Kabir, Md Ruhul
    Kumar, Amit
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 124 : 394 - 405
  • [28] Techno-economic study of biomass co-firing with and without CO2 capture in an Australian black coal-fired power plant
    Khorshidi, Zakieh
    Ho, Minh T.
    Wiley, Dianne E.
    [J]. GHGT-11, 2013, 37 : 6035 - 6042
  • [29] Biomass power cost and optimum plant size in western Canada
    Kumar, A
    Cameron, JB
    Flynn, PC
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2003, 24 (06) : 445 - 464
  • [30] Laboratory NET, 2010, COST PERFORMANCE BAS