Student & tutor consensus: a partnership in assessment for learning

被引:15
作者
Thompson, James [1 ]
Houston, Don [1 ]
Dansie, Kathryn [1 ]
Rayner, Timothy [1 ]
Pointon, Timothy [1 ]
Pope, Simon [1 ]
Cayetano, Anthea [1 ]
Mitchell, Brad [1 ]
Grantham, Hugh [1 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Sch Med, Paramed Unit, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
Consensus marking; self-reflection; co-assessment; self-regulated learning; paramedic education; FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1080/02602938.2016.1211988
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The mistakes made when attempting tasks often prove to be some of the most invaluable learning experiences. Despite this, outcome and results driven assessment formats largely penalise student performance errors or reward students who succeed by chance. The consequences of this paradigm are visible effects on student relationships with assessment. The student-tutor consensus approach to assessment was introduced to capture student learning achieved from' assessment to complement the measurement of performance outcomes. This approach parallels student and tutor judgement in a grade negotiation, affording the student an opportunity to share with their assessor what they have learned from the assessment activity. This student self-awareness was then considered alongside the conventional outcome-based score awarded by the tutor to generate a final grade for the assessed activity. Our study evaluated the perceptions of 90 undergraduate students enrolled in the bachelor of paramedic studies, who participated in this novel assessment approach as part of a final-year capstone topic. The results comprehensively indicated value for all aspects of the assessment approach, as well as a recognition that the skills will be useful in their future professional roles.
引用
收藏
页码:942 / 952
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   The influence of disciplinary assessment patterns on student learning: a comparative study [J].
Jessop, Tansy ;
Maleckar, Barbara .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2016, 41 (04) :696-711
[22]   Exploring the impact of student perceptions of Assessment for Learning on intrinsic motivation [J].
Pat-El, Ron J. ;
de Hoog, Natascha ;
Segers, Mien ;
Vedder, Paul .
STUDIES IN EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION, 2024, 83
[23]   Student voice in learning assessment: a pathway not yet developed at university [J].
Rodriguez-Gomez, Gregorio ;
Ibarra-Saiz, Maria Soledad ;
Gallego-Noche, Beatriz ;
Gomez-Ruiz, Miguel-Angel ;
Quesada-Serra, Victoria .
RELIEVE-REVISTA ELECTRONICA DE INVESTIGACION Y EVALUACION EDUCATIVA, 2012, 18 (02)
[24]   Student Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Formative Assessment in an Online Learning Environment [J].
Ogange, Betty Obura ;
Agak, John O. ;
Okelo, Kevin Odhiambo ;
Kiprotich, Peter .
OPEN PRAXIS, 2018, 10 (01) :29-39
[25]   Game-Informed Assessment for Playful Learning and Student Experience [J].
Pavlou, Maria .
JOURNAL OF CLASSICS TEACHING, 2020, 21 (41) :42-51
[26]   Enhancing Student' Learning Performance by Combining Flipped Learning and Online Formative Assessment Platform [J].
Cheng, Shu-chen ;
Cheng, Yu-ping ;
Huang, Yueh-min .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2023, 39 (02) :409-419
[27]   Enhancing Learning Environments: A Study of Student Perspectives on Learning, Engagement and Assessment in Higher Education [J].
Simion, Anca ;
Albulescu, Ion ;
Stan, Cristian .
REVISTA ROMANEASCA PENTRU EDUCATIE MULTIDIMENSIONALA, 2025, 17 (01) :217-246
[28]   Formative Assessment of Student’s Academic Achievements in Mobile Learning Environments [J].
Efrianova V. ;
Yaakob M. ;
Salameh A.A. ;
Hussin K.C. ;
Zaki N.A.M. .
International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 2024, 18 (11) :52-63
[29]   Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis [J].
Li, Hongli ;
Xiong, Yao ;
Hunte, Charles Vincent ;
Guo, Xiuyan ;
Tywoniw, Rurik .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 45 (02) :193-211
[30]   Student profiling in a dispositional learning analytics application using formative assessment [J].
Tempelaar, Dirk ;
Rienties, Bart ;
Mittelmeier, Jenna ;
Quan Nguyen .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2018, 78 :408-420