Managing the impact of globalization and technology on inequality

被引:10
作者
Tica, Josip [1 ]
Globan, Tomislav [1 ]
Arcabic, Vladimir [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zagreb, Fac Econ & Business, Zagreb, Croatia
来源
ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA | 2022年 / 35卷 / 01期
关键词
Inequality; technology; globalization; openness; threshold model; employment rate; UNITED-STATES; INCOME INEQUALITY; WAGE INEQUALITY; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; EMPLOYMENT; SKILLS; LABOR;
D O I
10.1080/1331677X.2021.1952466
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article tests the relative importance of globalization and technological change in explaining income inequality at higher and lower development levels. Besides, the article analyses the effectiveness of a set of policy measures for fighting inequality. We use relative pre-tax income shares as a proxy for inequality. Several linear and non-linear threshold panel data models with GDP per capita as the threshold variable are estimated for 42 countries over the period from 1994 to 2016. We find that technology is the most important generator of inequality, while the effect of various globalization measures is weak and often insignificant. We find limited evidence that the effect of globalization differs with respect to the level of GDP per capita. Our results suggest that full employment policies in the low inflation environment are the most efficient solution for the inequality problem. Higher employment and low inflation rate decrease the inequality level. Other than that, we do not find other policy measures that satisfy the one-size-fits-all criteria for tackling inequality. Instead, a set of efficient policy measures against inequality, including expenditures on education, minimum wage policies, and lending rates, depend on the development level and idiosyncratic policies and institutions.
引用
收藏
页码:1035 / 1060
页数:26
相关论文
共 42 条
[11]   CHANGES IN THE DEMAND FOR SKILLED LABOR WITHIN UNITED-STATES MANUFACTURING - EVIDENCE FROM THE ANNUAL SURVEY OF MANUFACTURES [J].
BERMAN, E ;
BOUND, J ;
GRILICHES, Z .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1994, 109 (02) :367-397
[12]   Implications of skill-biased technological change: International evidence [J].
Berman, E ;
Bound, J ;
Machin, S .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1998, 113 (04) :1245-1279
[13]   Skill-biased technological change and rising wage inequality: Some problems and puzzles [J].
Card, D ;
DiNardo, JE .
JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, 2002, 20 (04) :733-783
[14]   Is the relationship between inequality and growth affected by physical and human capital accumulation? [J].
Chambers, Dustin ;
Krause, Alan .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC INEQUALITY, 2010, 8 (02) :153-172
[15]   Is There a Debt-Threshold Effect on Output Growth? [J].
Chudik, Alexander ;
Mohaddes, Kamiar ;
Pesaran, M. Hashem ;
Raissi, Mehdi .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2017, 99 (01) :135-150
[16]  
Dabla-Norris ME, 2015, CAUSES CONSEQUENCES, DOI [10.5089/9781513555188.006, DOI 10.5089/9781513555188.006]
[17]  
Dalton R., 2017, The Participation Gap: Social Status and Political Inequality, DOI [10.1093/oso/9780198733607.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780198733607.001.0001]
[18]   Optimal monetary policy with staggered wage and price contracts [J].
Erceg, CJ ;
Henderson, DW ;
Levin, AT .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 2000, 46 (02) :281-313
[19]  
Feenstra RC, 1996, AM ECON REV, V86, P240
[20]   From physical to human capital accumulation: Inequality and the process of development [J].
Galor, O ;
Moav, O .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2004, 71 (04) :1001-1026