Loosening of the fixing screw in single implant crowns: predisposing factors, prevention and treatment options

被引:63
作者
Kourtis, Stefanos [1 ]
Damanaki, Mariana [1 ]
Kaitatzidou, Sofia [1 ]
Kaitatzidou, Aikaterini [1 ]
Roussou, Vasiliki [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl & Kapodestrian Univ Athens, Dept Prosthodont, Athens, Greece
关键词
abutment; implants; screw loosening; FIXED DENTAL PROSTHESES; IN-VITRO EVALUATION; COMPLICATION RATES; AESTHETIC COMPLICATIONS; CLINICAL-EVALUATION; ROTATIONAL FREEDOM; OBSERVATION PERIOD; SURVIVAL RATE; FOLLOW-UP; TECHNICAL COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1111/jerd.12303
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The problem of technical complications in implants and implant-supported restorations has existed for decades. The most frequent complication is the loosening of the fixing screw, which although is not catastrophic, if it occurs repeatedly, it may affect the success of the implant therapy and the patient satisfaction. Factors that affect the frequency of prosthetic complications include: the implant-abutment connection, para-functional habits, cantilevers, and the type of restoration. Regarding the implant-abutment connection, the first systems were those with an external hexagon. Because of their small height and the disadvantages that this entails, other connection types were developed, such as those of hexagonal and conical connection, which decreased the complication rates, including the loosening of the fixing screw. On the dilemma cement- or screw-retained restoration, the choice depends on biological, technical, and aesthetic factors. Cement-retained restorations are simpler in construction with lower cost and clinicians are more familiar with the clinical procedure. On the other side, if the fixing screw of the abutment is loosened in a cement-retained restoration, it may be a difficult and demanding clinical task to fix this prosthetic complication. Screw-retained restorations are more prone to loosening of the fixing screw, but allow easy retrievability and repair. Their use however, is often restricted because of diverting or unfavorable inclination of the alveolar ridge and the implant. The aim of this article was to present clinical solutions for the complication of screw-loosening through clinical examples and discuss the factors that may predispose to its occurrence. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCEThe problem of technical complications in implants and implant-supported restorations has existed for decades. The most frequent complication is the loosening of the fixing screw which, although is not catastrophic, if it occurs repeatedly, it may affect the success of the implant therapy and the patient satisfaction. Factors that affect the frequency of prosthetic complications include: the implant-abutment connection, para-functional habits, cantilevers and the type of restoration. The treatment options for the clinician are limited but certain preventing measures during construction of the restoration may be helpful to overcome this clinical problem.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 246
页数:14
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]   Effect of Single Off-Axis Implant Placement on Abutment Screw Stability Under Lateral Loading [J].
Abou-Obaid, Ala'a Ibrahim ;
Al-Otaibi, Hanan Nejer ;
Akeel, Riyadh Fadul .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2016, 31 (03) :520-526
[2]   A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extensions after an observation period of at least 5 years [J].
Aglietta, Marco ;
Siciliano, Vincenzo Iorio ;
Zwahlen, Marcel ;
Braegger, Urs ;
Pjetursson, Biarni E. ;
Lang, Niklaus P. ;
Salvi, Giovanni E. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (05) :441-451
[3]   Finite element stress analysis of the effect of short implant usage in place of cantilever extensions in mandibular posterior edentulism [J].
Akça, K ;
Iplikçioglu, H .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2002, 29 (04) :350-356
[4]   Evaluation of Rotational Freedom of In-Ceram Ceramic Blank Abutments Before and After Infiltration [J].
Aramouni, Philippe ;
Vigolo, Paolo ;
Majzoub, Zeina ;
Zebouni, Elie ;
Salameh, Ziad ;
Almas, Khalid .
IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2010, 19 (01) :50-56
[5]  
Assenza Bartolomeo, 2005, J Oral Implantol, V31, P242, DOI 10.1563/1548-1336(2005)31[242:SVCRAE]2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]   Effects of Different Abutment Connection Designs on the Stress Distribution Around Five Different Implants: A 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis [J].
Balik, Ali ;
Karatas, Meltem Ozdemir ;
Keskin, Haluk .
JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2012, 38 (01) :491-496
[8]   Long-term Outcome of One-Piece Implants. Part II: Prosthetic Outcomes. A Systematic Literature Review with Meta-Analysis [J].
Barrachina-Diez, Jose M. ;
Tashkandi, Esam ;
Stampf, Susanne ;
Att, Wael .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2013, 28 (06) :1470-1482
[9]   Clinical Outcomes of Implant Abutments in the Anterior Region: A Systematic Review [J].
Bidra, Avinash S. ;
Rungruanganunt, Patchanee .
JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2013, 25 (03) :159-176
[10]   Fit and Stability of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Frameworks Under Masticatory Simulation: Influence of Cylinder Type [J].
Brilhante Bhering, Claudia Lopes ;
Vieira Marques, Isabella da Silva ;
Ferreira Koyama Takahashi, Jessica Mie ;
Ricardo Barao, Valentim Adelino ;
Xediek Consani, Rafael Leonardo ;
Mesquita, Marcelo Ferraz .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2016, 25 (06) :459-465