Understanding the differences in gelling properties between lupin protein isolate and soy protein isolate

被引:102
作者
Berghout, J. A. M.
Boom, R. M.
van der Goot, A. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Food Proc Engn Grp, NL-6708 WG Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Gels; Lupin protein isolate; Soy protein isolate; Rheology; Sulfhydryl reactivity; FUNCTIONAL-PROPERTIES; GLOBULAR-PROTEINS; THERMAL GELATION; RICH FOODS; PEA; STABILITY; DEVICE; CROPS; SEEDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.07.003
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
The gelling properties of lupin protein isolate (LPI) were compared with those of soy protein isolate (SPI). It was found that LPI behaves fundamentally different than SPI, evidenced by the formation of weaker and deformable gels. Further investigation shows that both protein isolates can be considered particle gels and that LPI particles do not swell as much as SPI particles inside the network. Besides, heating hardly affects LPI particles while SPI particles show additional swelling. To explain the differences, the sulfhydryl reactivity of LPI was tested. The amount of free sulfhydryl groups on LPI was higher than the amount of free sulfhydryl groups on SPI. Upon heating the amount of free sulfhydryl groups on LPI increases. We hypothesize that the compact, heat stable structure of the protein particles suppresses the intermolecular bonding through disulphide bridge formation and favours intramolecular crosslinking. The small sulphur-rich proteins that are not incorporated within the particles but are present in the surrounding solution cannot strengthen the particle network, due to their low concentration. LPI did not form gels of similar consistency as SPI and may therefore be less useful for solid food products. The thermal stability of LPI could offer opportunities for high-protein foods that require low viscosity after heating. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 472
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Effects of designed sulfhydryl groups and disulfide bonds into soybean proglycinin on its structural stability and heat-induced gelation [J].
Adachi, M ;
Ho, CY ;
Utsumi, S .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2004, 52 (18) :5717-5723
[2]   Number of thiol groups rather than the size of the aggregates determines the hardness of cold set whey protein gels [J].
Alting, AC ;
Hamer, RJ ;
de Kruif, CG ;
Paques, M ;
Visschers, RW .
FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS, 2003, 17 (04) :469-479
[3]  
[Anonymous], DAIRY SCI TECHNOLOGY
[4]   Food Gels: Gelling Process and New Applications [J].
Banerjee, Soumya ;
Bhattacharya, Suvendu .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION, 2012, 52 (04) :334-346
[5]   Accessing gelling ability of vegetable proteins using rheological and fluorescence techniques [J].
Batista, AP ;
Portugal, CAM ;
Sousa, I ;
Crespo, JG ;
Raymundo, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES, 2005, 36 (03) :135-143
[6]  
Belski R, 2012, ADV FOOD NUTR RES, V66, P147, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-394597-6.00004-5
[7]   The potential of aqueous fractionation of lupin seeds for high-protein foods [J].
Berghout, J. A. M. ;
Boom, R. M. ;
van der Goot, A. J. .
FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2014, 159 :64-70
[8]  
Clark A.H., 1998, Functional Properties of Food Macromolecules
[9]  
CLARK AH, 1987, ADV POLYM SCI, V83, P57
[10]  
Damodaran S., 2008, FENNEMAS FOOD CHEM