The Impact of Lecture Fluency and Technology Fluency on Students' Online Learning and Evaluations of Instructors

被引:4
作者
Witherby, Amber E. [1 ]
Carpenter, Shana K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Psychol, W112 Lagomarcino Hall,901 Stange Rd, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
instructor fluency; online learning; student evaluations of teaching; visual quality; metacognition; NOTE-TAKING; EDUCATION; MULTITASKING; PERCEPTIONS; DISFLUENCY; CONFIDENCE; DIFFICULTY; JUDGMENTS; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.1037/mac0000003
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
General Audience Summary Advances in technology in recent years have led to changes in students' experiences in college courses. Students can take classes, and even complete degrees, entirely online. As such, it is important to explore how students learn from online lectures and how various factors influence students' experiences. The goal of the present study was to investigate how two factors influence students' online learning. First, when watching a lecture, the instructor can vary in how fluently they present the information. Some instructors present information in a fluent manner where they speak clearly and confidently. Other instructors present information in a disfluent manner, where they speak less confidently and stumble over their words. Second, in an online context, technology quality can vary depending on the students' internet connection and computer graphics. Thus, technology fluency (e.g., visual quality) may be high for some students and low for others. We explored how these two factors-lecture fluency and technology fluency-impacted students' learning, perceptions of their learning, and evaluations of the instructor. Students watched an online lecture that was delivered in a fluent or disfluent manner and that was presented with good visual quality or poor visual quality. After watching the lecture, they rated the instructor and their learning and completed a test. Students' learning was unaffected by lecture fluency or technology fluency. However, students who watched the fluent lecture thought that they learned the material better and rated the instructor as more effective compared to students who watched the disfluent lecture. Thus, although lecture fluency does not impact students' actual learning in an online context, it can bias their perceptions of their learning and their evaluations of their instructor. Given the increasing popularity of online courses, it is important to explore how factors inherent to online lectures influence students' learning and metacognition. We evaluated how lecture fluency (via instructor delivery style) and technology fluency (via visual quality) influence students' learning, perceptions of learning, and evaluations of the instructor. Students watched an online lecture that was delivered in a fluent or disfluent manner (Experiments 1 and 2) presented with good or poor visual quality (Experiment 2). Next, students judged their learning, answered evaluation questions, and completed a test over the lecture. Although lecture fluency did not impact learning, students who watched a fluent lecture reported learning more and rated the instructor as more effective than did students who watched the disfluent lecture. Technology fluency did not impact any outcome. Thus, lecture fluency (but not technology fluency) can influence students' perceptions, but not their actual learning, in an online context.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 509
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning
    Alter, Adam L.
    Oppenheimer, Daniel M.
    Epley, Nicholas
    Eyre, Rebecca N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2007, 136 (04) : 569 - 576
  • [2] Bjork R.A., 1994, METACOGNITION KNOWIN, DOI DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/4561.003.0011
  • [3] Self-Regulated Learning: Beliefs, Techniques, and Illusions
    Bjork, Robert A.
    Dunlosky, John
    Kornell, Nate
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 64, 2013, 64 : 417 - +
  • [4] Students' Use of Retrieval in Self-Regulated Learning: Implications for Monitoring and Regulating Effortful Learning Experiences
    Carpenter, Shana K.
    Endres, Tino
    Hui, Luotong
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2020, 32 (04) : 1029 - 1054
  • [5] On Students' (Mis)judgments of Learning and Teaching Effectiveness
    Carpenter, Shana K.
    Witherby, Amber E.
    Tauber, Sarah K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2020, 9 (02) : 137 - 151
  • [6] Effects of Lecture Fluency and Instructor Experience on Students' Judgments of Learning, Test Scores, and Evaluations of Instructors
    Carpenter, Shana K.
    Northern, Paige E.
    Tauber, Sarah Uma
    Toftness, Alexander R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 2020, 26 (01) : 26 - 39
  • [7] The Effect of Instructor Fluency on Students' Perceptions of Instructors, Confidence in Learning, and Actual Learning
    Carpenter, Shana K.
    Mickes, Laura
    Rahman, Shuhebur
    Fernandez, Chad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 2016, 22 (02) : 161 - 172
  • [8] Appearances can be deceiving: instructor fluency increases perceptions of learning without increasing actual learning
    Carpenter, Shana K.
    Wilford, Miko M.
    Kornell, Nate
    Mullaney, Kellie M.
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2013, 20 (06) : 1350 - 1356
  • [9] How we trust, perceive, and learn from virtual humans: The influence of voice quality
    Chiou, Erin K.
    Schroeder, Noah L.
    Craig, Scotty D.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2020, 146
  • [10] Fortune favors the Bold (and the Italicized): Effects of disfluency on educational outcomes
    Diemand-Yauman, Connor
    Oppenheimer, Daniel M.
    Vaughan, Erikka B.
    [J]. COGNITION, 2011, 118 (01) : 111 - 115