Productivity and Welfare Effects of Nigeria's e-Voucher-Based Input Subsidy Program

被引:69
作者
Wossen, Tesfamicheal [1 ]
Abdoulaye, Tahirou [2 ]
Alene, Arega [3 ]
Feleke, Shiferaw [4 ]
Ricker-Gilbert, Jacob [5 ]
Manyong, Victor [4 ]
Awotide, Bola Amoke [2 ]
机构
[1] IITA, Abuja, Nigeria
[2] IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria
[3] IITA, Lilongwe, Malawi
[4] IITA, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
[5] Purdue Univ, Dept Agr Econ, 403 W State St, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
agricultural input subsidies; welfare; productivity; smallholders; Nigeria; mobile phone; MALAWI; ADOPTION; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.021
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
In an attempt to go beyond the so called "smart" subsidies, Nigeria has embarked on a potentially innovative mobile phone-based input subsidy program that provides fertilizer and improved seed subsidies through electronic vouchers. In this article, we examined the productivity and welfare effects of the program using household-level data from rural Nigeria. The article employed instrumental variable regression approach to control for the potential endogeneity of the input subsidy program. Our results suggest that the program is effective in improving productivity and welfare outcomes of beneficiary smallholders. The size of the estimated effects suggests a large improvement in productivity and welfare outcomes. Moreover, the distributional effects of the program suggest no heterogeneity effects based on gender and farm land size. These results are robust to using alternative measurements of program participation. The benefit cost ratio of 1.11 suggests that the program is marginally cost-effective. Overall, our results suggest that while improving average productivity is a good outcome for improving food security, improving the distributional outcome of the program by targeting the most disadvantaged groups would maximize the program's contribution to food security and poverty reduction. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 265
页数:15
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Adesina A., 2012, AGR TRANSFORMATION A
[2]  
Africa G., 2014, FERTILIZER SUBSIDY R
[3]   The Economy-wide Impacts and Risks of Malawi's Farm Input Subsidy Program [J].
Arndt, Channing ;
Pauw, Karl ;
Thurlow, James .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 98 (03) :962-980
[4]   The impact of seed vouchers on poverty reduction among smallholder rice farmers in Nigeria [J].
Awotide, Bola Amoke ;
Karimov, Aziz ;
Diagne, Aliou ;
Nakelse, Tebila .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 44 (06) :647-658
[5]   Cropland Allocation Effects of Agricultural Input Subsidies in Malawi [J].
Chibwana, Christopher ;
Fisher, Monica ;
Shively, Gerald .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 40 (01) :124-133
[6]  
Chirwa EDorward A., 2013, Agricultural input subsidies: The recent Malawi experience
[7]   The Malawi agricultural input subsidy programme: 2005/06 to 2008/09 [J].
Dorward, Andrew ;
Chirwa, Ephraim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, 9 (01) :232-247
[8]  
FMARD, 2011, Agricultural Transformation Agenda: We Will Grow Nigeria's Agricultural Sector. Draft for Discussion
[9]   A CLASS OF DECOMPOSABLE POVERTY MEASURES [J].
FOSTER, J ;
GREER, J ;
THORBECKE, E .
ECONOMETRICA, 1984, 52 (03) :761-766
[10]   Input Subsidies, Cash Constraints, and Timing of Input Supply [J].
Holden, Stein T. ;
Lunduka, Rodney W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 96 (01) :290-307