Spinal anesthesia in contemporary and complex lumbar spine surgery: experience with 343 cases

被引:21
作者
Breton, Jeffrey M. [1 ,2 ]
Ludwig, Calvin G. [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Michael J. [1 ]
Nail, T. Jayde [1 ]
Riesenburger, Ron, I [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Penny [3 ]
Kryzanski, James T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[3] Tufts Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
spinal anesthesia; awake spine surgery; complex spine surgery; lumbar spine surgery; POSTOPERATIVE COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; COST-ANALYSIS; COMPLICATIONS; DELIRIUM; IMPACT; RISK; STENOSIS;
D O I
10.3171/2021.7.SPINE21847
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Spinal anesthesia (SA) is an alternative to general anesthesia (GA) for lumbar spine surgery, including complex instrumented fusion, although there are relatively few outcome data available. The authors discuss their experience using SA in a modern complex lumbar spine surgery practice to describe its utility and implementation. METHODS Data from patients receiving SA for lumbar spine surgery by one surgeon from March 2017 to December 2020 were collected via a retrospective chart review. Cases were divided into nonfusion and fusion procedure categories and analyzed for demographics and baseline medical status; pre-, intra-, and postoperative events; hospital course, including Acute Pain Service (APS) consults; and follow-up visit outcome data. RESULTS A total of 345 consecutive lumbar spine procedures were found, with 343 records complete for analysis, including 181 fusion and 162 nonfusion procedures and spinal levels from T11 through S1. The fusion group was significantly older (mean age 65.9 +/- 12.4 vs 59.5 +/- 15.4 years, p < 0.001) and had a significantly higher proportion of patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification class III (p = 0.009) than the nonfusion group. There were no intraoperative conversions to GA, with infrequent need for a second dose of SA preoperatively (2.9%, 10/343) and rare preoperative conversion to GA (0.6%, 2/343) across fusion and nonfusion groups. Rates of complications during hospitalization were comparable to those seen in the literature. The APS was consulted for 2.9% (10/343) of procedures. An algorithm for the integration of SA into a lumbar spine surgery practice, from surgical and anesthetic perspectives, is also offered. CONCLUSIONS SA is a viable, safe, and effective option for lumbar spine surgery across a wide range of age and health statuses, particularly in older patients and those who want to avoid GA. The authors' protocol, based in part on the largest set of data currently available describing complex instrumented fusion surgeries of the lumbar spine completed under SA, presents guidance and best practices to integrate SA into contemporary lumbar spine practices.
引用
收藏
页码:534 / 541
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Cost Analysis of Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Lumbar Diskectomy and Laminectomy Spine Surgery
    Agarwal, Prateek
    Pierce, John
    Welch, William C.
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 89 : 266 - 271
  • [2] Anesthesia Exposure and Risk of Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease: A Prospective Study
    Aiello Bowles, Erin J.
    Larson, Eric B.
    Pong, Ryan P.
    Walker, Rod L.
    Anderson, Melissa L.
    Yu, Onchee
    Gray, Shelly L.
    Crane, Paul K.
    Dublin, Sascha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2016, 64 (03) : 602 - 607
  • [3] [Anonymous], ASA PHYS STAT CLASS
  • [4] Impact of the Economic Downturn on Elective Lumbar Spine Surgery in the United States: A National Trend Analysis, 2003 to 2013
    Bernstein, David N.
    Brodell, David
    Li, Yue
    Rubery, Paul T.
    Mesfin, Addisu
    [J]. GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 7 (03) : 213 - 219
  • [5] Shaping anesthetic techniques to reduce post-operative delirium (SHARP) study: a protocol for a prospective pragmatic randomized controlled trial to evaluate spinal anesthesia with targeted sedation compared with general anesthesia in older adults undergoing lumbar spine fusion surgery
    Brown, Charles H.
    Jones, Emily L.
    Lin, Charles
    Esmaili, Melody
    Gorashi, Yara
    Skelton, Richard A.
    Kaganov, Daniel
    Colantuoni, Elizabeth A.
    Yanek, Lisa R.
    Neufeld, Karin J.
    Kamath, Vidyulata
    Sieber, Frederick E.
    Dean, Clayton L.
    Edwards, Charles C., II
    Hogue, Charles W.
    [J]. BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [6] Delirium After Spine Surgery in Older Adults: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes
    Brown, Charles H.
    LaFlam, Andrew
    Max, Laura
    Wyrobek, Julie
    Neufeld, Karin J.
    Kebaish, Khaled M.
    Cohen, David B.
    Walston, Jeremy D.
    Hogue, Charles W.
    Riley, Lee H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2016, 64 (10) : 2101 - 2108
  • [7] Regional anesthesia versus general anesthesia for surgery on the lumbar spine: A review of the modern literature
    De Rojas, Joaquin O.
    Syre, Peter
    Welch, William C.
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 119 : 39 - 43
  • [8] Spinal anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery correlates with fewer total medications and less frequent use of vasoactive agents: A single center experience
    Deng, Hao
    Coumans, Jean-Valery
    Anderson, Richard
    Houle, Timothy T.
    Peterfreund, Robert A.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (06):
  • [9] Trends, Major Medical Complications, and Charges Associated With Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Older Adults
    Deyo, Richard A.
    Mirza, Sohail K.
    Martin, Brook I.
    Kreuter, William
    Goodman, David C.
    Jarvik, Jeffrey G.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 303 (13): : 1259 - 1265
  • [10] Edipoglu IS, 2019, PAIN PHYSICIAN, V22, P495