Sustainability constraints on UK bioenergy development

被引:55
作者
Thornley, Patricia [1 ,2 ]
Upham, Paul [1 ,3 ]
Tomei, Julia [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Tyndall Ctr Manchester, Manchester M60 1QD, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Sch Mech Aerosp & Civil Engn, Manchester M60 1QD, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Manchester Business Sch, Manchester M60 1QD, Lancs, England
[4] Kings Coll London, Dept Geog, London, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Bioenergy; Constraints; Sustainability; PHALARIS-ARUNDINACEA FIELDS; MISCANTHUS X GIGANTEUS; ENERGY-POSSIBILITIES; RESIDUES; WASTE; ARGENTINA; BIOMASS; PLANT; OLIVE; PALM;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.028
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Use of bioenergy as a renewable resource is increasing in many parts of the world and can generate significant environmental, economic and social benefits if managed with due regard to sustainability constraints. This work reviews the environmental, social and economic constraints on key feedstocks for UK heat, power and transport fuel. Key sustainability constraints include greenhouse gas savings achieved for different fuels, land availability, air quality impacts and facility siting. Applying those constraints, we estimate that existing technologies would facilitate a sustainability constrained level of medium-term bioenergy/biofuel supply to the UK of 4.9% of total energy demand, broken down into 4.3% of heat demands, 4.3% of electricity, and 5.8% of transport fuel. This suggests that attempts to increase the supply above these levels could have counterproductive sustainability impacts in the absence of compensating technology developments or identification of additional resources. The barriers that currently prevent this level of supply being achieved have been analysed and classified. This suggests that the biggest policy impacts would be in stimulating the market for heat demand in rural areas, supporting feedstock prices in a manner that incentivised efficient use/maximum greenhouse gas savings and targeting investment capital that improves yield and reduces land-take. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5623 / 5635
页数:13
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
*ANGL POL U, 2003, WAST VEG OIL REC BIO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, PALM OIL IND IS COOK
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, ENV IMPACT MAIZE CUL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, BIOFUELS IS CURE WOR
[5]  
[Anonymous], PUEBL FUM INF PROBL
[6]  
Archer E., 2005, MECH BIOL TREATMENT
[7]  
*BIOF CORP EUR OBS, 2007, AGR REAL CHECK 9 KEY
[8]  
*BIOM EN CTR, 2007, SHORT ROT FOR
[9]  
BOOTH EJ, 2005, RES REV HOME GROWN C, V53
[10]   Good or bad bioethanol from a greenhouse gas perspective - What determines this? [J].
Borjesson, Pal .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2009, 86 (05) :589-594