Trip generation rates for large elevators - A North Dakota case study

被引:0
|
作者
Tolliver, Denver [1 ]
Dybing, Alan [1 ]
Mitra, Subhro [1 ]
机构
[1] North Dakota State Univ, Upper Great Plains Transportat Inst, 430 IACC Bldg, Fargo, ND 58105 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Large grain elevators are major sources of truck traffic in many areas. Shuttle trains, a recent railroad innovation, have further concentrated truck deliveries at larger elevators. These facilities-which have not been analyzed in previous trip generation studies-pose issues such as large truck access and pavement design. In this paper, elevator trip generation equations are estimated from detailed facility, land use, and highway traffic data in North Dakota. A trip attraction equation is used to explain the effects of elevator storage capacity and side track capacity on elevator throughput. Elevators are classified on the basis of track capacity as shuttle train, unit train, and multicar. Shuttle-train elevators typically consign 110-car trains, while unit-train elevators consign 50- to 100-car trains. The analysis shows that large shuttle-train elevators may generate 35,000 to 40,000 loaded and empty truck trips per year. A large unit-train elevator may generate 20,000 annual trips. The trucks are usually a mixture of combination five-axle and single-unit trucks. On average, each truck generates 1.04 equivalent single-axle loads on flexible pavements. Thus, a large facility may generate much of the traffic load experienced by pavements in the area. Moreover, truck deliveries to elevators exhibit seasonal variation. Approximately 15% of the annual volume is delivered during the peak month. Thus, a large shuttle facility may generate 225 trucks per day during the peak harvest month.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Large land holdings in North Dakota
    Benton, Alva H.
    JOURNAL OF LAND AND PUBLIC UTILITY ECONOMICS, 1925, 1 (04): : 405 - 413
  • [2] Freight Generation, Freight Trip Generation, and Perils of Using Constant Trip Rates
    Holguin-Veras, Jose
    Jaller, Miguel
    Destro, Lisa
    Ban, Xuegang
    Lawson, Catherine
    Levinson, Herbert S.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2011, (2224) : 68 - 81
  • [3] Trip generation rates of correctional facilities
    J Urban Plann Dev, 1600, 1 (18-25):
  • [4] MOVIE THEATER TRIP GENERATION RATES
    BAUMGAERTNER, WE
    ITE JOURNAL-INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS, 1985, 55 (06): : 44 - 49
  • [5] Trip generation rates of correctional facilities
    French, LJ
    Eck, RW
    Balmer, AM
    Legg, J
    JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-ASCE, 2000, 126 (01): : 18 - 25
  • [6] Borrowing residential trip generation rates
    Miller, JS
    Hoel, LA
    Goswami, AK
    Ulmer, JM
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, 2006, 132 (02) : 105 - 113
  • [7] Trip generation rates of consolidated schools
    Balmer, AM
    French, LJ
    Eck, RW
    Legg, J
    ITE JOURNAL-INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS, 2000, 70 (08): : 30 - 34
  • [8] The impacts of an industry switch to large rail grain hopper cars on local infrastructure: A case study of North Dakota
    Bitzan, John
    Tolliver, Denver
    Transportation Quarterly, 2003, 57 (02): : 135 - 154
  • [9] Trip Generation Rates for a University Campus: The Case of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
    Basbas, Socrates
    Takatzoglou, Konstantinos
    Mintsis, George
    Taxiltaris, Christos
    Politis, Ioannis
    DATA ANALYTICS: PAVING THE WAY TO SUSTAINABLE URBAN MOBILITY, 2019, 879 : 11 - 18
  • [10] Crop Residue Harvest Economics: An Iowa and North Dakota Case Study
    Archer, David W.
    Karlen, Douglas L.
    Liebig, Mark A.
    BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2014, 7 (02) : 568 - 575