Role of PI-RADS Version 2 for Prediction of Upgrading in Biopsy-Proven Prostate Cancer With Gleason Score 6

被引:34
作者
Song, Wan [1 ]
Bang, Seok Hwan [2 ]
Jeon, Hwang Gyun [2 ]
Jeong, Byong Chang [2 ]
Seo, Seong Il [2 ]
Jeon, Seong Soo [2 ]
Choi, Han Yong [3 ]
Kim, Chan Kyo [4 ,5 ]
Lee, Hyun Moo [2 ]
机构
[1] Ewha Womans Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Urol, 81 Irwon Ro, Seoul 135710, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Kangbuk Samsung Hosp, Dept Urol, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Samsung Med Ctr, 81 Irwon Ro, Seoul 135710, South Korea
[5] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Imaging Sci, Samsung Med Ctr, 81 Irwon Ro, Seoul 135710, South Korea
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; PI-RADSv2; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Upgrading; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; GRADING SYSTEM; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; RISK; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.clgc.2018.02.015
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We investigated the role of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADSv2) for prediction of upgrading in patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 prostate cancers. After retrospective analysis of 443 patients, clinical parameters with PI-RADSv2 showed significantly higher accuracy for upgrading compared with clinical parameters alone. PI-RADSv2 might be used as a preoperative imaging tool to determine risk classification. Introduction: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADSv2) on prediction of postoperative Gleason score (GS) upgrading for patients with biopsy GS 6 prostate cancer. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 443 patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radical prostatectomy for biopsy-proven GS 6 prostate cancer between January 2011 and December 2013. Preoperative clinical variables and pathologic GS were examined, and all MRI findings were assessed with PI-RADSv2. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare predictive accuracies of multivariate logistic regression models with or without PI-RADSv2. Results: Of the total 443 patients, 297 (67.0%) experienced GS upgrading postoperatively. PI-RADSv2 scores 1 to 3 and 4 to 5 were identified in 157 (25.4%) and 286 (64.6%) patients, respectively, and the rate of GS upgrading was 54.1% and 74.1%, respectively (P < .001). In multivariate analysis, prostate-specific antigen density > 0.16 ng/mL(2), number of positive cores >= 2, maximum percentage of cancer per core > 20, and PI-RADSv2 score 4 to 5 were independent predictors influencing GS upgrading (each P < .05). When predictive accuracies of multivariate models with or without PI-RADSv2 were compared, the model including PI-RADSv2 was shown to have significantly higher accuracy (area under the curve, 0.729 vs. 0.703; P = .041). Conclusion: Use of PI-RADSv2 is an independent predictor of postoperative GS upgrading and increases the predictive accuracy of GS upgrading. PI-RADSv2 might be used as a preoperative imaging tool to determine risk classification and to help counsel patients with regard to treatment decision and prognosis of disease.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 287
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Can multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging predict upgrading of transrectal ultrasound biopsy results at more definitive histology? [J].
Abd-Alazeez, Mohamed ;
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Arya, Manit ;
Allen, Clare ;
Dikaios, Nikolaos ;
Freeman, Alex ;
Emberton, Mark ;
Kirkham, Alex .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2014, 32 (06) :741-747
[2]   20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Albertsen, PC ;
Hanley, JA ;
Fine, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (17) :2095-2101
[3]   Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Recommendations for Use [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Weinreb, Jeffrey C. ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Thoeny, Harriet C. ;
Tempany, Clare M. ;
Shtern, Faina ;
Padhani, Anwar R. ;
Margolis, Daniel ;
Macura, Katarzyna J. ;
Haider, Masoom A. ;
Cornud, Francois ;
Choyke, Peter L. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) :41-49
[4]   ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Richenberg, Jonathan ;
Clements, Richard ;
Choyke, Peter ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) :746-757
[5]   The Impact of Discordance Between Biopsy and Pathological Gleason Scores on Survival After Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Boorjian, Stephen A. ;
Karnes, R. Jeffrey ;
Crispen, Paul L. ;
Rangel, Laureano J. ;
Bergstralh, Eric J. ;
Sebo, Thomas J. ;
Blute, Michael L. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (01) :95-104
[6]   Comparing the Gleason prostate biopsy and Gleason prostatectomy grading system: The Lahey Clinic Medical Center experience and an international meta-analysis [J].
Cohen, Michael S. ;
Hanley, Robert S. ;
Kurteva, Teodora ;
Ruthazer, Robin ;
Silverman, Mark L. ;
Sorcini, Andrea ;
Hamawy, Karim ;
Roth, Robert A. ;
Tuerk, Ingolf ;
Libertino, John A. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (02) :371-381
[7]   Time trends in clinical risk stratification for prostate cancer: Implications for outcomes (data from CaPSURE) [J].
Cooperberg, MR ;
Lubeck, DP ;
Mehta, SS ;
Carroll, PR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (06) :S21-S25
[8]  
Cooperberg MR, 2003, J UROLOGY, V170, P6
[9]   Upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsies and pathology following radical prostatectomy significantly impacts upon the risk of biochemical recurrence [J].
Corcoran, Niall M. ;
Hong, Matthew K. H. ;
Casey, Rowan G. ;
Hurtado-Coll, Antonio ;
Peters, Justin ;
Harewood, Laurence ;
Goldenberg, S. Larry ;
Hovens, Chris M. ;
Costello, Anthony J. ;
Gleave, Martin E. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (8B) :E202-E210
[10]   Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Whittington, R ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Schultz, D ;
Blank, K ;
Broderick, GA ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Renshaw, AA ;
Kaplan, I ;
Beard, CJ ;
Wein, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11) :969-974