Differences between audio media and conventional methods regarding students' academic performance and the influence of audio media satisfaction on their academic scores at a Ugandan university

被引:0
作者
Kaahwa, Mark [1 ]
Zhu, Chang [2 ]
Muhumuza, Moses [1 ]
Karemera, Charles [3 ]
机构
[1] Mt Moon Univ, Sch Educ, POB 837, Ft Portal, Uganda
[2] Vrije Univ Brussel, Dept Educ Sci, Pl Laan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Mt Moon Univ, Sch Informat & Comp, POB 837, Ft Portal, Uganda
关键词
audio media technology; AMT; conventional instructional strategies; podcast quality; podcast efficiency; podcast accessibility; audio media satisfaction; academic performance; CLASSROOM; PODCASTS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This study examined two hypotheses: there is a difference between students' scores in the conventional and audio media instructional strategies and students' satisfaction with audio media technology influences their academic scores. We carried out an experimental study involving the treatment group with 166 students taught using audio media instructional strategy. The control group consisted of 167 students taught using the conventional approach. Both groups were subjected to similar assessment and academic scores were compared. Independent T-test and multiple regression tests were used in the study. Findings indicate that there is no statistically significant difference in academic performance between the instructional strategies. Furthermore, results showed that students' satisfaction with audio media technology does not influence their academic scores. It can be concluded therefore, that an audio media instructional strategy is another effective teaching approach. Besides, it can be concluded that students' audio media satisfaction does not affect their academic scores.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 511
页数:21
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Abdullah Z., 2014, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, V4, P108, DOI DOI 10.6007/IJARBSS/V4-I4/763
  • [2] Akessa G.M., 2015, Journal of Education and Practice, V6, P55
  • [3] Alelaimat A.R., 2012, Higher Education Studies, V2, P40
  • [4] Undergraduate students' performance: the case of University of Malaya
    Alfan, Ervina
    Othman, Md
    [J]. QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION, 2005, 13 (04) : 329 - +
  • [5] Ali S., 2013, American Journal of Educational Research, V1, P283, DOI [DOI 10.12691/EDUCATI0N-1-8-3, 10.12691/education-1-8-3, DOI 10.12691/EDUCATION-1-8-3]
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2000, J ASYNCHRONOUS LEARN
  • [7] Media will never influence learning': but will simulation?
    Artino, Anthony R., Jr.
    Durning, Steven J.
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 46 (07) : 630 - 632
  • [8] Beldarrain Y., 2006, DISTANCE EDUC, V27, P139, DOI [DOI 10.1080/01587910600789498, 10.1080/01587910600789498]
  • [9] Chester A, 2011, EDUC TECHNOL SOC, V14, P236
  • [10] Cheta W., 2018, British Journal of Education, V6, P103