Effect of central corneal thickness on dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in primary open-angle glaucoma

被引:34
作者
Grieshaber, Matthias C. [1 ]
Schoetzau, Andreas [1 ]
Zawinka, Claudia [1 ]
Flammer, Josef [1 ]
Orgul, Selim [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archopht.125.6.740
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the dependence of dynamic contour tonometry ( DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry ( GAT) on central corneal thickness ( CCT) in primary open-angle glaucoma. Methods: In a prospective study, the interocular ( right vs left eye) difference in intraocular pressure measured by DCT and GAT was compared with the interocular CCT difference in 125 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Results: Dynamic contour tonometry measurements ( mean +/- SD, 19.4 +/- 4.1 mm Hg) were significantly ( P = .004) higher than GAT measurements ( mean +/- SD, 15.5 +/- 3.4 mm Hg), correlating significantly with each other ( r(2) = 0.82, P < .001). The interocular difference in intraocular pressure correlated significantly with the interocular CCT difference for GAT ( r = 0.30, P = .001) and DCT ( r = 0.23, P = .02) readings. Dynamic contour tonometry and GAT intraocular pressure differences significantly increased with older age ( slope, 0.033 [ 95% confidence interval, 0.002-0.064] mm Hg/y; P = .03) but not with thicker CCT ( slope, 0.006 [ 95% confidence interval, -0.003 to 0.017] mm Hg/mu m; P = .22). Conclusions: In this series, GAT and DCT measurements were dependent on CCT in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Because intraocular pressure differences between DCT and GAT were independent of CCT, DCT and GAT are susceptible to similar measurement biases depending on CCT.
引用
收藏
页码:740 / 744
页数:5
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Ocular hypertension and central corneal thickness [J].
Argus, WA .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1995, 102 (12) :1810-1812
[2]   Ocular surface inflammatory changes induced by topical antiglaucoma drugs -: Human and animal studies [J].
Baudouin, C ;
Pisella, PJ ;
Fillacier, K ;
Goldschild, M ;
Becquet, F ;
De Saint Jean, M ;
Béchetoille, A .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 106 (03) :556-563
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]   Falsely elevated intraocular pressure due to increased central corneal thickness [J].
Bron, AM ;
Creuzot-Garcher, C ;
Goudeau-Boutillon, S ;
d'Athis, P .
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 237 (03) :220-224
[5]   Central corneal thickness and progression of the visual field and optic disc in glaucoma [J].
Chauhan, BC ;
Hutchison, DM ;
LeBlanc, RP ;
Artes, PH ;
Nicolela, MT .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 89 (08) :1008-1012
[6]  
Copt RP, 1999, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V117, P14
[7]   Influence of corneal variables on accuracy of intraocular pressure measurement [J].
Damji, KF ;
Muni, RH ;
Munger, RM .
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2003, 12 (01) :69-80
[8]   Dynamic contour tonometry for post-LASIK intraocular pressure measurements [J].
Duba, I ;
Wirthlin, AC .
KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2004, 221 (05) :347-350
[9]  
EHLERS N, 1974, ACTA OPHTHALMOL, V52, P740
[10]   Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readings [J].
Feltgen, N ;
Leifert, D ;
Funk, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 85 (01) :85-87