A computational strategy for prestressing patient-specific biomechanical problems under finite deformation

被引:125
作者
Gee, M. W. [1 ]
Foerster, Ch [1 ]
Wall, W. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Inst Computat Mech, D-85747 Garching, Germany
关键词
inverse design analysis; prestressing; prestraining; patient-specific modeling; biomechanics; abdominal aortic aneurysm; ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM; STRESS-ANALYSIS; RUPTURE RISK; WALL STRESS; ELASTOSTATICS;
D O I
10.1002/cnm.1236
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In simulation of biomechanical structures the patient-specific geometry of the object of interest is very often reconstructed from in vivo medical imaging such as CT scans. Such geometries therefore represent a deformed configuration stressed by typical in vivo conditions. Commonly, such structures are considered stress free in simulation. In this contribution we present and compare two methods to introduce a physically meaningful stress/strain state to the obtained geometry for simulations in the finite strain regime and demonstrate the necessity of such prestressing techniques. One method is based on an inverse design analysis to calculate a stress-free reference configuration. The other method developed here is based on a modified updated Lagrangian formulation. The formulation of both methods is provided in detail and implementation issues are discussed. Applicability and accurateness of both approaches are compared and evaluated utilizing an analytical aorta model and fully three-dimensional patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm structures in the finite strain regime. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 72
页数:21
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   APPLICATIONS OF AN ENERGY-MOMENTUM TENSOR IN NONLINEAR ELASTOSTATICS [J].
CHADWICK, P .
JOURNAL OF ELASTICITY, 1975, 5 (3-4) :249-258
[2]   Finite element modelling of inverse design problems in large deformations anisotropic hyperelasticity [J].
Fachinotti, Victor D. ;
Cardona, Alberto ;
Jetteur, Philippe .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2008, 74 (06) :894-910
[3]   Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: Wall stress versus diameter [J].
Fillinger, MF ;
Marra, SP ;
Raghavan, ML ;
Kennedy, FE .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 37 (04) :724-732
[4]   In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk [J].
Fillinger, MF ;
Raghavan, ML ;
Marra, SP ;
Cronenwett, JL ;
Kennedy, FE .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 36 (03) :589-597
[5]   Computational methods for inverse finite elastostatics [J].
Govindjee, S ;
Mihalic, PA .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 1996, 136 (1-2) :47-57
[6]  
Govindjee S, 1998, INT J NUMER METH ENG, V43, P821, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19981115)43:5<821::AID-NME453>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-C
[8]  
Holzapfel G., 2000, Nonlinear Solid Mechanics: A Continuum Approach forEnineering
[9]   Intracranial and abdominal aortic aneurysms: Similarities, differences, and need for a new class of computational models [J].
Humphrey, J. D. ;
Taylor, C. A. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 10 :221-246
[10]   The biomechanics of arterial aneurysms [J].
Lasheras, Juan C. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2007, 39 (293-319) :293-319