共 56 条
Large-scale group decision-making based on Pythagorean linguistic preference relations using experts clustering and consensus measure with non-cooperative behavior analysis of clusters
被引:23
作者:
Mandal, Prasenjit
[1
]
Samanta, Sovan
[2
]
Pal, Madhumangal
[1
]
机构:
[1] Vidyasagar Univ, Dept Appl Math Oceanol & Comp Programming, Midnapore 721102, WB, India
[2] Tamralipta Mahavidyalaya, Dept Math, Tamluk 721636, WB, India
关键词:
Pythagorean linguistic preference relation;
Group decision-making;
Consensus model;
Non-cooperative behaviors;
SELF-CONFIDENCE;
AGGREGATION OPERATORS;
MODEL;
INFORMATION;
MAKERS;
D O I:
10.1007/s40747-021-00369-y
中图分类号:
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号:
081104 ;
0812 ;
0835 ;
1405 ;
摘要:
To represent qualitative aspect of uncertainty and imprecise information, linguistic preference relation (LPR) is a powerful tool for experts expressing their opinions in group decision-making (GDM) according to linguistic variables (LVs). Since for an LV, it generally means that membership degree is one, and non-membership and hesitation degrees of the experts cannot be expressed. Pythagorean linguistic numbers/values (PLNs/PLVs) are novel choice to address this issue. The aim of this paper which we propose a GDM problem involved a large number of the experts is called large-scale GDM (LSGDM) based on Pythagorean linguistic preference relation (PLPR) with a consensus model. Sometimes, the experts do not modify their opinions to achieve consensus. Therefore, the experts' proper opinions' management with their non-cooperative behaviors (NCBs) is necessary to establish a consensus model. At the same time, it is essential to ensure the proper adjustment of the credibility information. The proposed model using grey clustering method is divided with the experts' similar evaluations into a subgroup. Then, we aggregate the experts' evaluations in each cluster. A cluster consensus index (CCI) and a group consensus index (GCI) are presented to measure consensus level among the clusters. Then, we provide a mechanism for managing the NCBs of the clusters, which contain two parts: (1) NCB degree is defined using CCI and GCI for identifying the NCBs of the clusters; (2) implemented the weight punishment mechanism of the NCBs clusters to consensus improvement. Finally, an example is offered for usefulness of the proposed approach.
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 833
页数:15
相关论文