Online Bi-Objective Scheduling for IaaS Clouds Ensuring Quality of Service

被引:32
作者
Tchernykh, Andrei [1 ]
Lozano, Luz [1 ]
Schwiegelshohn, Uwe [2 ]
Bouvry, Pascal [3 ]
Pecero, Johnatan E. [3 ]
Nesmachnow, Sergio [4 ]
Drozdov, Alexander Yu. [5 ]
机构
[1] CICESE Res Ctr, Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico
[2] TU Dortmund Univ, Dortmund, Germany
[3] Univ Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Belgium
[4] Univ Republica, Montevideo, Uruguay
[5] Moscow Inst Phys & Technol, Dolgoprudnyi, Russia
关键词
Cloud computing; Service level agreement; Energy efficiency; Multi-objective scheduling; IaaS; Provider income; TIME;
D O I
10.1007/s10723-015-9340-0
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper focuses on a bi-objective experimental evaluation of online scheduling in the Infrastructure as a Service model of Cloud computing regarding income and power consumption objectives. In this model, customers have the choice between different service levels. Each service level is associated with a price per unit of job execution time, and a slack factor that determines the maximal time span to deliver the requested amount of computing resources. The system, via the scheduling algorithms, is responsible to guarantee the corresponding quality of service for all accepted jobs. Since we do not consider any optimistic scheduling approach, a job cannot be accepted if its service guarantee will not be observed assuming that all accepted jobs receive the requested resources. In this article, we analyze several scheduling algorithms with different cloud configurations and workloads, considering the maximization of the provider income and minimization of the total power consumption of a schedule. We distinguish algorithms depending on the type and amount of information they require: knowledge free, energy-aware, and speed-aware. First, to provide effective guidance in choosing a good strategy, we present a joint analysis of two conflicting goals based on the degradation in performance. The study addresses the behavior of each strategy under each metric. We assess the performance of different scheduling algorithms by determining a set of non-dominated solutions that approximate the Pareto optimal set. We use a set coverage metric to compare the scheduling algorithms in terms of Pareto dominance. We claim that a rather simple scheduling approach can provide the best energy and income trade-offs. This scheduling algorithm performs well in different scenarios with a variety of workloads and cloud configurations.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 22
页数:18
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Ahmad I., 2012, Handbook of Energy -Aware and Green Computing
  • [2] [Anonymous], IBEROAMERICAN J RES
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1999, Evolutionary Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization: Methods and Applications
  • [4] Das Gupta B, 2001, J SCHED, V4, P297, DOI 10.1002/jos.085
  • [5] Deb K., 2001, MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIM, V16
  • [6] A hierarchical approach for energy-efficient scheduling of large workloads in multicore distributed systems
    Dorronsoro, Bernabe
    Nesmachnow, Sergio
    Taheri, Javid
    Zomaya, Albert Y.
    Talbi, El-Ghazali
    Bouvry, Pascal
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE COMPUTING-INFORMATICS & SYSTEMS, 2014, 4 (04) : 252 - 261
  • [7] Hirales-Carbajal A., 2010, PROC INT S INTELL SI, P1
  • [8] Iturriaga S, 2013, COMPUT INFORM, V32, P273
  • [9] KHAN S., 2011, INT C CLOUD GREEN CO, P1
  • [10] A Cooperative Game Theoretical Technique for Joint Optimization of Energy Consumption and Response Time in Computational Grids
    Khan, Samee Ullah
    Ahmad, Ishfaq
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS, 2009, 20 (03) : 346 - 360