The effect of dental artifacts, contrast media, and experience on Interobserver contouring variations in head and neck anatomy

被引:33
作者
O'Daniel, Jennifer C.
Rosenthal, David I.
Garden, Adam S.
Barker, Jerry L.
Ahamad, Anesa
Ang, K. Kian
Asper, Joshua A.
Blanco, Angel I.
de Crevoisier, Renaud
Holsinger, Christopher
Patel, Chirag B.
Schwartz, David L.
Wang, He
Dong, Lei
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Houston, TX USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS | 2007年 / 30卷 / 02期
关键词
head and neck cancer; interobserver variability; contour delineation; CT-based treatment planning; target volume;
D O I
10.1097/01.coc.0000256704.58956.45
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: To investigate interobserver variability in the delineation of head-and-neck (H&N) anatomic structures on CT images, including the effects of image artifacts and observer experience. Methods: Nine observers (7 radiation oncologists, 1 surgeon, and 1 physician assistant) with varying levels of H&N delineation experience independently contoured H&N gross tumor volumes and critical structures on radiation therapy treatment planning CT images alongside reference diagnostic CT images for 4 patients with oropharynx cancer. Image artifacts from dental fillings partially obstructed 3 images. Differences in the structure volumes, center-of-volume positions, and boundary positions (1 SD) were measured. In-house software created three-dimensional overlap distributions, including all observers. The effects of dental artifacts and observer experience on contouring precision were investigated, and the need for contrast media was assessed. Results: In the absence of artifacts, all 9 participants achieved reasonable precision (1 SD <= 3 mm all boundaries). The structures obscured by dental image artifacts had larger variations when measured by the 3 metrics (1 SD = 8 mm cranial/caudal boundary). Experience improved the interobserver consistency of contouring for structures obscured by artifacts (1 SD = 2 mm cranial/caudal boundary). Conclusions: Interobserver contouring variability for anatomic H&N structures, specifically oropharyngeal gross tumor volumes and parotid glands, was acceptable in the absence of artifacts. Dental artifacts increased the contouring variability, but experienced participants achieved reasonable precision even with artifacts present. With a staging contrast CT image as a reference, delineation on a noncontrast treatment planning CT image can achieve acceptable precision.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 198
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Measurement of lung tumor volumes using three-dimensional computer planning software
    Bowden, P
    Fisher, R
    Mac Manus, M
    Wirth, A
    Duchesne, G
    Millward, M
    McKenzie, A
    Andrews, J
    Ball, D
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 53 (03): : 566 - 573
  • [2] Collier Dawn C, 2003, J Appl Clin Med Phys, V4, P17, DOI 10.1120/1.1521271
  • [3] Intra- and inter-observer variability in contouring prostate and seminal vesicles: implications for conformal treatment planning
    Fiorino, C
    Reni, M
    Bolognesi, A
    Cattaneo, GM
    Calandrino, R
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1998, 47 (03) : 285 - 292
  • [4] Variations in target delineation for head and neck IMRT: An international multi-institutional study
    Hong, TS
    Tome, WA
    Chappell, RJ
    Harari, PM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (01): : S157 - S158
  • [5] The impact of daily setup variations on head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Hong, TS
    Tomé, WA
    Chappell, RJ
    Chinnaiyan, P
    Mehta, MP
    Harari, PM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (03): : 779 - 788
  • [6] Variability in target volume delineation on CT scans of the breast
    Hurkmans, CW
    Borger, JH
    Pieters, BR
    Russell, NS
    Jansen, EPM
    Mijnheer, BJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 50 (05): : 1366 - 1372
  • [7] ADVERSE REACTIONS TO IONIC AND NONIONIC CONTRAST-MEDIA - A REPORT FROM THE JAPANESE-COMMITTEE-ON-THE-SAFETY-OF-CONTRAST MEDIA
    KATAYAMA, H
    YAMAGUCHI, K
    KOZUKA, T
    TAKASHIMA, T
    SEEZ, P
    MATSUURA, K
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1990, 175 (03) : 621 - 628
  • [8] Evaluation of intrafraction patient movement for CNS and head & neck IMRT
    Kim, S
    Akpati, HC
    Kielbasa, JE
    Li, JG
    Liu, CR
    Amdur, RJ
    Palta, JR
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (03) : 500 - 506
  • [9] Reports on contrast media reactions: Analysis of data from reports to the US Food and Drug Administration
    Lasser, EC
    Lyon, SG
    Berry, CC
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1997, 203 (03) : 605 - 610
  • [10] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy use in the U.S, 2004
    Mell, LK
    Mehrotra, AK
    Mundt, AJ
    [J]. CANCER, 2005, 104 (06) : 1296 - 1303