Encouraging Scholarship: Medical School Programs to Promote Student Inquiry Beyond the Traditional Medical Curriculum

被引:71
作者
Green, Emily P. [1 ]
Borkan, Jeffrey M. [2 ,3 ]
Pross, Susan H. [4 ]
Adler, Shelley R. [5 ]
Nothnagle, Melissa [6 ]
Parsonnet, Julie [7 ]
Gruppuso, Philip A.
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Scholarly Concentrat Program, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Scholarly Concentrat Comm, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[3] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Curriculum Comm, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[4] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, Scholarly Concentrat Program, Tampa, FL USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Osher Ctr Integrat Med, Dept Family & Community Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[6] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Womens Reprod Hlth Freedom & Rights Scholarly Con, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[7] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181cd3e00
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Many medical curricula now include programs that provide students with opportunities for scholarship beyond that provided by their traditional, core curricula. These scholarly concentration (SC) programs vary greatly in focus and structure, but they share the goal of producing physicians with improved analytic, creative, and critical-thinking skills. In this article, the authors explore models of both required and elective SC programs. They gathered information through a review of medical school Web sites and direct contact with representatives of individual programs. Additionally, they discuss in-depth the SC programs of the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University; the University of South Florida College of Medicine; the University of California, San Francisco; and Stanford University School of Medicine. The authors describe each program's focus, participation, duration, centralization, capstone requirement, faculty involvement, and areas of concentration. Established to address a variety of challenges in the U. S. medical education system, these four programs provide an array of possible models for schools that are considering the establishment of an SC program. Although data on the impact of SC programs are lacking, the authors believe that this type of program has the potential to significantly impact the education of medical students through scholarly, in-depth inquiry and longitudinal faculty mentorship.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 418
页数:10
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]   How to Measure Success: The Impact of Scholarly Concentrations on Students-A Literature Review [J].
Bierer, S. Beth ;
Chen, Huiju Carrie .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2010, 85 (03) :438-452
[2]   Luke's 3rd year: A 35-year retrospective [J].
Blazer, D ;
Bradford, W ;
Reilly, C .
TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 2001, 13 (03) :192-198
[3]  
Cuban L, 1997, AM EDUC RES J, V34, P83, DOI 10.3102/00028312034001083
[4]  
EBBERT A, 1960, J MED EDUC, V35, P637
[5]   In-depth learning: One school's initiatives to foster integration of ethics, values, and the human dimensions of medicine [J].
Kanter, Steven L. ;
Wimmers, Paul F. ;
Levine, Arthur S. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2007, 82 (04) :405-409
[6]   Required vs. Elective Research and In-Depth Scholarship Programs in the Medical Student Curriculum [J].
Parsonnet, Julie ;
Gruppuso, Philip A. ;
Kanter, Steven L. ;
Boninger, Michael .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2010, 85 (03) :405-408
[7]   The Scholarly Project Initiative: Introducing scholarship in medicine through a longitudinal, mentored curricular program [J].
Schor, NF ;
Troen, P ;
Kanter, SL ;
Levine, AS .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2005, 80 (09) :824-831