Backfitting Estimation for Geographically Weighted Regression Models with Spatial Autocorrelation in the Response

被引:9
作者
Chen, Feng [1 ,2 ]
Leung, Yee [2 ]
Mei, Chang-Lin [3 ]
Fung, Tung [2 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Math & Stat, Dept Stat, Xian, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Geog & Resource Management, Inst Future Cities, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Xian Polytech Univ, Sch Sci, Xian, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
NONSTATIONARITY; EMISSION; TESTS;
D O I
10.1111/gean.12289
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Geographically weighted regression model with a spatially autoregressive term of the response variable (GWR-Lag model for short) is a useful tool to simultaneously model spatial autocorrelation in the response variable and spatial heterogeneity in the regression relationship. The profile maximum likelihood estimation has been developed to calibrate the model, where a single bandwidth is used for all of the spatially varying coefficients. However, due to different spatial scales at which the explanatory variables might operate, the coefficients may have different levels of spatial heterogeneity and cannot be effectively estimated by a single bandwidth. To deal with such multiscale problem, a backfitting method is proposed to calibrate the GWR-Lag model, where the optimal bandwidth size is separately selected for each coefficient and the autoregressive parameter is estimated by maximizing the log-likelihood function. A simulation study with a comparison of the GWR-based profile maximum likelihood (GWR-ML) estimation is conducted to assess the performance of the backfitting approach. The empirical results show that the backfitting method not only provides useful scale information for each explanatory variable, but also yields more accurate estimators of the coefficients. Furthermore, a real-life data set is analyzed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the backfitting approach.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 381
页数:25
相关论文
共 45 条
[11]   Statistical estimation in varying coefficient models [J].
Fan, JQ ;
Zhang, WY .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1999, 27 (05) :1491-1518
[12]   Spatial econometrics, economic geography, dynamics and equilibrium: a 'third way'? [J].
Fingleton, B .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2000, 32 (08) :1481-1498
[13]   Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) [J].
Fotheringham, A. Stewart ;
Yang, Wenbai ;
Kang, Wei .
ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GEOGRAPHERS, 2017, 107 (06) :1247-1265
[14]   "The Problem of Spatial Autocorrelation" and Local Spatial Statistics [J].
Fotheringham, A. Stewart .
GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS, 2009, 41 (04) :398-403
[15]   County-level determinants of local public services in Appalachia: a multivariate spatial autoregressive model approach [J].
Gebremariam, Gebremeskel H. ;
Gebremedhin, Tesfa G. ;
Schaeffer, Peter V. .
ANNALS OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2012, 49 (01) :175-190
[16]   A new method for dealing simultaneously with spatial autocorrelation and spatial heterogeneity in regression models [J].
Geniaux, Ghislain ;
Martinetti, Davide .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2018, 72 :74-85
[17]   On the Harrison and Rubinfeld data [J].
Gilley, OW ;
Pace, RK .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1996, 31 (03) :403-405
[18]  
Gollini I, 2015, J STAT SOFTW, V63, P1
[19]   HEDONIC HOUSING PRICES AND DEMAND FOR CLEAN-AIR [J].
HARRISON, D ;
RUBINFELD, DL .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1978, 5 (01) :81-102
[20]  
Hastie T.J., 2017, Statistical Models in S, DOI DOI 10.1214/SS/1177013604