Seasonal variation in preference dictates space use in an invasive generalist

被引:23
作者
Paolini, Kelsey E. [1 ]
Strickland, Bronson K. [1 ]
Tegt, Jessica L. [1 ]
VerCauteren, Kurt C. [2 ]
Street, Garrett M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Wildlife Fisheries & Aquaculture, Starkville, MS 39759 USA
[2] USDA, Natl Wildlife Res Ctr, Ft Collins, CO USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 07期
基金
美国农业部;
关键词
BOAR SUS-SCROFA; WILD BOAR; FUNCTIONAL-RESPONSES; RESOURCE SELECTION; HABITAT SELECTION; PLANT PHENOLOGY; HOME-RANGE; REGRESSION; DIET; MISSISSIPPI;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0199078
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background The spatiotemporal distribution of resources is a critical component of realized animal distributions. In agricultural landscapes, space use by generalist consumers is influenced by ephemeral resource availability that may produce behavioral differences across agricultural seasons, resulting in economic and production consequences and increased human-wildlife conflict. Our objective was to assess changes in habitat selection across seasons in an invasive generalist omnivore (feral pigs, Sus scrofa). Hypothesizing that pig space use is primarily driven by forage availability, we predicted strong selection for the most nutritionally beneficial crops and resource types as agricultural seasons progressed. We deployed GPS collars on 13 adult feral pigs in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley to study resource selection in a fragmented agricultural landscape. We estimated resource selection using mixed-effect logistic regression to assess variation in selection across planting, growing, harvest, and fallow seasons. Results We found that feral pigs varied resource selection across seasons, particularly for corn (Zea mais). We also detected seasonal dependencies in proportional coverage on the net probability of selection of a land unit (e.g., selection was generally strongest for locations composed of both agricultural and natural habitat), resulting in marked variation in predicted space use among agricultural seasons. Conclusions These findings indicate behavioral changes in selection across agricultural seasons are driven by complex interactions between the availabilities of temporally dynamic resources and temporally static natural cover. Temporal variations in resource selection trends indicate seasonal responses to crop phenology which suggests a season-specific habitat functional response.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] Estimating space-use and habitat preference from wildlife telemetry data
    Aarts, Geert
    MacKenzie, Monique
    McConnell, Bernie
    Fedak, Mike
    Matthiopoulos, Jason
    [J]. ECOGRAPHY, 2008, 31 (01) : 140 - 160
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, USDA - National Agricultural Statistics Service - Arkansas
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2007, DATA ANAL USING REGR
  • [4] Predictors of white-tailed deer grazing intensity in fragmented deciduous forests
    Augustine, DJ
    Jordan, PA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1998, 62 (03) : 1076 - 1085
  • [5] A review of wild boar Sus scrofa diet and factors affecting food selection in native and introduced ranges
    Ballari, Sebastian A.
    Barrios-Garcia, M. Noelia
    [J]. MAMMAL REVIEW, 2014, 44 (02) : 124 - 134
  • [6] Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
    Bates, Douglas
    Maechler, Martin
    Bolker, Benjamin M.
    Walker, Steven C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01): : 1 - 48
  • [7] Ungulate foraging strategies: energy maximizing or time minimizing?
    Bergman, CM
    Fryxell, JM
    Gates, CC
    Fortin, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2001, 70 (02) : 289 - 300
  • [8] An integrated approach to identify spatiotemporal and individual-level determinants of animal home range size
    Borger, Luca
    Franconi, Novella
    Ferretti, Francesco
    Meschi, Fiora
    De Michele, Giampiero
    Gantz, Alberto
    Coulson, Tim
    [J]. AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2006, 168 (04) : 471 - 485
  • [9] Relating populations to habitats using resource selection functions
    Boyce, MS
    McDonald, LL
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1999, 14 (07) : 268 - 272
  • [10] Selecting indicator species to monitor ecological integrity: A review
    Carignan, V
    Villard, MA
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2002, 78 (01) : 45 - 61