Multi-objective optimization and techno-economic analysis of CO2 utilization through direct synthesis of di-methyl ether plant

被引:10
作者
Yasari, Elham [1 ]
Panahi, Mehdi [1 ]
Rafiee, Ahmad [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Fac Engn, Chem Engn Dept, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
[2] South Ural State Univ, Dept Theoret Fdn Elect Engn, Fac Energy, Chelyabinsk, Russia
关键词
annual profit; CO2; utilization; di-methyl-ether synthesis; multiobjective optimization; natural gas-derived syngas; SYNTHESIS GAS-PRODUCTION; BUBBLE-COLUMN REACTOR; DME DIRECT SYNTHESIS; FIXED-BED REACTOR; NATURAL-GAS; LIQUIDS PROCESS; METHANOL; SYNGAS; SIMULATION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1002/er.6961
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In this study, a multiobjective optimization problem (MOOP) with two objective functions (maximization of di-methyl-ether (DME) production rate and minimization of carbon dioxide release) was applied to the direct synthesis of DME from a natural gas-derived synthesis gas (syngas). Twelve degrees of freedom were considered. The MOOP results suggest that the process with a maximum DME production rate of 1686 kmol/hr releases 4788 kmol/hr CO2 while the CO2 release of the process with DME production rate of 1282 kmol/hr is 1761 kmol/hr. The higher the DME production rate, the lower net CO2 emission to the air, natural gas consumption, and energy consumption per kg of the DME produced. In addition, the process with a higher DME production rate has a higher carbon efficiency and power production from the produced steam. The annual profit criteria of the overall process were used as a posterior preference index to select the best point from the resultant multiobjective optimization Pareto front. It was shown that the plant with the topmost DME production rate has the utmost annual profit compared to other Pareto optimum points. Lastly, the effect of degrees of freedom on the maximum DME production rate is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:18103 / 18120
页数:18
相关论文
共 66 条
[21]   Production of hydrogen from dimethyl ether [J].
Galvita, VV ;
Semin, GL ;
Belyaev, VD ;
Yurieva, TM ;
Sobyanin, VA .
APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL, 2001, 216 (1-2) :85-90
[22]   Process Simulation and Environmental Aspects of Dimethyl Ether Production from Digestate-Derived Syngas [J].
Giuliano, Aristide ;
Catizzone, Enrico ;
Freda, Cesare .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (02) :1-21
[23]   CHEMICAL-EQUILIBRIA IN METHANOL SYNTHESIS [J].
GRAAF, GH ;
SIJTSEMA, PJJM ;
STAMHUIS, EJ ;
JOOSTEN, GEH .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1986, 41 (11) :2883-2890
[24]   INTRAPARTICLE DIFFUSION LIMITATIONS IN LOW-PRESSURE METHANOL SYNTHESIS [J].
GRAAF, GH ;
SCHOLTENS, H ;
STAMHUIS, EJ ;
BEENACKERS, AACM .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1990, 45 (04) :773-783
[25]   KINETICS OF LOW-PRESSURE METHANOL SYNTHESIS [J].
GRAAF, GH ;
STAMHUIS, EJ ;
BEENACKERS, AACM .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1988, 43 (12) :3185-3195
[26]   Systematic staging in chemical reactor design [J].
Hillestad, Magne .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2010, 65 (10) :3301-3312
[27]   Dimethyl Ether Synthesis with in situ H2O Removal in Fixed-Bed Membrane Reactor: Model and Simulations [J].
Iliuta, I. ;
Larachi, F. ;
Fongarland, P. .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2010, 49 (15) :6870-6877
[28]   CO2 Utilization Process Simulation for Enhancing Production of Dimethyl Ether (DME) [J].
Kartohardjono, Sutrasno ;
Adji, Bayu Sari ;
Muharam, Yuswan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 2020
[29]  
Kim IH, 2010, COMPUT-AIDED CHEM EN, V28, P799
[30]  
Krasnogor N., 2000, GENETIC EVOLUTIONARY, P987