Multi-objective optimization and techno-economic analysis of CO2 utilization through direct synthesis of di-methyl ether plant

被引:10
作者
Yasari, Elham [1 ]
Panahi, Mehdi [1 ]
Rafiee, Ahmad [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Fac Engn, Chem Engn Dept, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
[2] South Ural State Univ, Dept Theoret Fdn Elect Engn, Fac Energy, Chelyabinsk, Russia
关键词
annual profit; CO2; utilization; di-methyl-ether synthesis; multiobjective optimization; natural gas-derived syngas; SYNTHESIS GAS-PRODUCTION; BUBBLE-COLUMN REACTOR; DME DIRECT SYNTHESIS; FIXED-BED REACTOR; NATURAL-GAS; LIQUIDS PROCESS; METHANOL; SYNGAS; SIMULATION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1002/er.6961
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In this study, a multiobjective optimization problem (MOOP) with two objective functions (maximization of di-methyl-ether (DME) production rate and minimization of carbon dioxide release) was applied to the direct synthesis of DME from a natural gas-derived synthesis gas (syngas). Twelve degrees of freedom were considered. The MOOP results suggest that the process with a maximum DME production rate of 1686 kmol/hr releases 4788 kmol/hr CO2 while the CO2 release of the process with DME production rate of 1282 kmol/hr is 1761 kmol/hr. The higher the DME production rate, the lower net CO2 emission to the air, natural gas consumption, and energy consumption per kg of the DME produced. In addition, the process with a higher DME production rate has a higher carbon efficiency and power production from the produced steam. The annual profit criteria of the overall process were used as a posterior preference index to select the best point from the resultant multiobjective optimization Pareto front. It was shown that the plant with the topmost DME production rate has the utmost annual profit compared to other Pareto optimum points. Lastly, the effect of degrees of freedom on the maximum DME production rate is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:18103 / 18120
页数:18
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Recent developments in autothermal reforming and pre-reforming for synthesis gas production in GTL applications [J].
Aasberg-Petersen, K ;
Christensen, TS ;
Nielsen, CS ;
Dybkjær, I .
FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 83 (1-3) :253-261
[2]   Technologies for large-scale gas conversion [J].
Aasberg-Petersen, K ;
Hansen, JHB ;
Christensen, TS ;
Dybkjaer, I ;
Christensen, PS ;
Nielsen, CS ;
Madsen, SELW ;
Rostrup-Nielsen, JR .
APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL, 2001, 221 (1-2) :379-387
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ORYX REPORT
[4]   Dimethyl ether: A review of technologies and production challenges [J].
Azizi, Zoha ;
Rezaeimanesh, Mohsen ;
Tohidian, Tahere ;
Rahimpour, Mohammad Reza .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND PROCESSING-PROCESS INTENSIFICATION, 2014, 82 :150-172
[5]   Exergy analysis of indirect dimethyl ether production process [J].
Bahadori, Fatemeh ;
Oshnuie, Mehran Nalband .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2019, 31 :142-145
[6]   Update on synthesis gas production for GTL [J].
Bakkerud, PK .
CATALYSIS TODAY, 2005, 106 (1-4) :30-33
[7]   CATALYTIC DEHYDRATION OF METHANOL TO DIMETHYL ETHER - KINETIC INVESTIGATION AND REACTOR SIMULATION [J].
BERCIC, G ;
LEVEC, J .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 1993, 32 (11) :2478-2484
[8]  
Breeze P., 2010, COST POWER GENERATIO
[9]  
Centi G, 2014, GREEN CARBON DIOXIDE: ADVANCES IN CO2 UTILIZATION, P215
[10]   Thermodynamic approach and comparison of two-step and single step DME (dimethyl ether) syntheses with carbon dioxide utilization [J].
Chen, Wei-Hsin ;
Hsu, Chih-Liang ;
Wang, Xiao-Dong .
ENERGY, 2016, 109 :326-340