Angiographic and clinical outcomes of patients implanted with ultrathin, biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

被引:0
作者
Liao, Chen [1 ,2 ]
Liao, Sen [3 ]
Liu, Miaoweng [2 ]
Xu, Ruoxin [2 ]
Peng, Jinhua [1 ]
Wei, Yiping [1 ]
Zhang, Wenxiong [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Affiliated Hosp 2, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Jiangxi Med Coll, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Nanchang Univ, FuZhou Med Coll, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Meta-analysis; Polymers; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Coronary artery disease; 5-YEAR OUTCOMES; NON-INFERIORITY; DESSOLVE III; THIN-STRUT; MULTICENTER; SAFETY; IV; QUALITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.23736/S0021-9509.20.11620-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Whether sirolimus-eluting stents constituted with ultrathin-strut and biodegradable polymers (BP-SESs) can achieve a preferable effect over current drug-eluting stents with durable polymers (DP-DESs) remains highly controversial. The aim of this analysis based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was to detect the clinical and angiographic differences between ultrathin (defined as a strut thickness <70 mu m) BP-SESs and DP-DESs. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We searched seven databases to identify eligible articles. Late lumen loss (LLL) and target lesion failure (TLF) were assessed as the primary endpoints for angiographic and clinical outcomes, respectively. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Nineteen articles containing thirteen RCTs with 14801 patients were analyzed. For the 9-month angiographic outcomes, similar results were discovered between BP-SESs and DP-DESs in terms of in-stent LLL (mean difference [MD]: -0.02 [-0.05, 0.01], P=0.23), in-segment LLL (MD: -0.01 [-0.04, 0.03], P=0.74), in-stent minimum lumen diameter (MLD) (MD: -0.01 [-0.06, 0.04], P=0.72), insegment MLD (MD: -0.01 [-0.06, 0.05], P=0.75), in-stent diameter stenosis (DS) (MD: -1.10 [-3.36, 1.15], P=0.34), in-segment DS (MD: -0.78 [-1.97, 0.40], P=0.20), in-stent binary restenosis (BR) (risk ratio [RR]: 2.27 [0.99, 5.21], P=0.05) and in-segment BR (RR: 1.46 [0.78, 2.75], P=0.24). Regarding the 12-month clinical outcomes, there was a significant decrease in TLF and a trend of a lower incidence of target vessel failure (RR: 0.89 [0.78,1.01], P=0.08), myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel MI. CONCLUSIONS: With similar angiographic results, BP-SESs appeared to be superior to DP-DESs with better clinical prognoses, especially for female patients, patients with STEMI and ACS and patients without diabetes. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 187
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy and safety of zotarolimus-eluting stents compared with sirolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions - A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Fan, Jinqi
    Du, Huaan
    Yin, Yuehui
    Ling, Zhiyu
    Wu, Jinjin
    Xiao, Peilin
    Zrenner, Bernhard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 167 (05) : 2126 - 2133
  • [42] Subgroup Analysis Comparing Ultrathin, Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin, Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: BIOFLOW V Acute Coronary Syndromes Subgroup
    Roguin, Ariel
    Kandzari, David E.
    Marcusohn, Erez
    Koolen, Jacques J.
    Doros, Gheorghe
    Massaro, Joseph M.
    Garcia-Garcia, Hector M.
    Bennett, Johan
    Gharib, Elie G.
    Cutlip, Donald E.
    Waksman, Ron
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 11 (10)
  • [43] Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes of bioabsorbable polymer versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rehman, Abdur
    Ahmed, Ifra Eeman
    Nouman, Ahmed
    Irfan, Rabia
    Rehman, Qareeha
    Syed, Abdul Rehman Shah
    Zakir, Syeda Javeria
    Mehdi, Samar
    Khosa, Maha Mushtaq
    Kumar, Satesh
    Khatri, Mahima
    Samiullah, F. N. U.
    Mohamad, Tamam
    Varrassi, Giustino
    EGYPTIAN HEART JOURNAL, 2024, 76 (01)
  • [44] Randomized Multicenter Trial Investigating Angiographic Outcomes of Hybrid Sirolimus-Eluting Stents With Biodegradable Polymer Compared With Everolimus-Eluting Stents With Durable Polymer in Chronic Total Occlusions The PRISON IV Trial
    Teeuwen, Koen
    van der Schaaf, Rene J.
    Adriaenssens, Tom
    Koolen, Jacques J.
    Smits, Pieter C.
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    Vermeersch, Paul H. M. J.
    Gin, R. Melvyn Tjon Joe
    Scholzel, Bastiaan E.
    Kelder, Johannes C.
    Tijssen, Jan G. P.
    Agostoni, Pierfrancesco
    Suttorp, Maarten J.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (02) : 133 - 143
  • [45] Nobori Biolimus-Eluting Stent vs. Permanent Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Danzi, Gian Battista
    Piccolo, Raffaele
    Galasso, Gennaro
    Piscione, Federico
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2014, 78 (08) : 1858 - +
  • [46] Newer-Generation Ultrathin Strut Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Older Second-Generation Thicker Strut Drug-Eluting Stents for Coronary Artery Disease Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Bangalore, Sripal
    Toklu, Bora
    Patel, Neil
    Feit, Frederick
    Stone, Gregg W.
    CIRCULATION, 2018, 138 (20) : 2216 - 2226
  • [47] Outcomes of patients treated with a biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents after rotational atherectomy
    Mankerious, Nader
    Hemetsberger, Rayyan
    Traboulsi, Hussein
    Toelg, Ralph
    Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed
    Richardt, Gert
    Allali, Abdelhakim
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 110 (10) : 1574 - 1585
  • [48] Ultrathin-strut, biodegradable-polymer, sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin-strut, durable-polymer, everolimus-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary revascularisation: 5-year outcomes of the BIOSCIENCE randomised trial
    Pilgrim, Thomas
    Piccolo, Raffaele
    Heg, Dik
    Roffi, Marco
    Tuller, David
    Muller, Olivier
    Moarof, Igal
    Siontis, George C. M.
    Cook, Stephane
    Weilenmann, Daniel
    Kaiser, Christoph
    Cuculi, Florim
    Hunziker, Lukas
    Eberli, Franz R.
    Juni, Peter
    Windecker, Stephan
    LANCET, 2018, 392 (10149) : 737 - 746
  • [49] Impact of three or more sirolimus-eluting stents versus paclitaxel-eluting stents on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
    Chu, William W.
    Kuchulakanti, Pramod K.
    Torguson, Rebecca
    Wang, Betty
    Clavijo, Leonardo C.
    Suddath, William O.
    Pichard, Augusto D.
    Satler, Lowell F.
    Kent, Kenneth M.
    Waksman, Ron
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2006, 68 (01) : 62 - 66
  • [50] Five-year outcomes of biodegradable versus second-generation durable polymer drug-eluting stents used in complex percutaneous coronary intervention
    Xu, Na
    Jiang, Lin
    Yao, Yi
    Xu, Jingjing
    Liu, Ru
    Wang, Huanhuan
    Song, Ying
    Gao, Lijian
    Gao, Zhan
    Zhao, Xueyan
    Xu, Bo
    Han, Yaling
    Yuan, Jinqing
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 136 (03) : 322 - 330