Angiographic and clinical outcomes of patients implanted with ultrathin, biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

被引:0
作者
Liao, Chen [1 ,2 ]
Liao, Sen [3 ]
Liu, Miaoweng [2 ]
Xu, Ruoxin [2 ]
Peng, Jinhua [1 ]
Wei, Yiping [1 ]
Zhang, Wenxiong [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Affiliated Hosp 2, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Jiangxi Med Coll, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Nanchang Univ, FuZhou Med Coll, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Meta-analysis; Polymers; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Coronary artery disease; 5-YEAR OUTCOMES; NON-INFERIORITY; DESSOLVE III; THIN-STRUT; MULTICENTER; SAFETY; IV; QUALITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.23736/S0021-9509.20.11620-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Whether sirolimus-eluting stents constituted with ultrathin-strut and biodegradable polymers (BP-SESs) can achieve a preferable effect over current drug-eluting stents with durable polymers (DP-DESs) remains highly controversial. The aim of this analysis based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was to detect the clinical and angiographic differences between ultrathin (defined as a strut thickness <70 mu m) BP-SESs and DP-DESs. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We searched seven databases to identify eligible articles. Late lumen loss (LLL) and target lesion failure (TLF) were assessed as the primary endpoints for angiographic and clinical outcomes, respectively. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Nineteen articles containing thirteen RCTs with 14801 patients were analyzed. For the 9-month angiographic outcomes, similar results were discovered between BP-SESs and DP-DESs in terms of in-stent LLL (mean difference [MD]: -0.02 [-0.05, 0.01], P=0.23), in-segment LLL (MD: -0.01 [-0.04, 0.03], P=0.74), in-stent minimum lumen diameter (MLD) (MD: -0.01 [-0.06, 0.04], P=0.72), insegment MLD (MD: -0.01 [-0.06, 0.05], P=0.75), in-stent diameter stenosis (DS) (MD: -1.10 [-3.36, 1.15], P=0.34), in-segment DS (MD: -0.78 [-1.97, 0.40], P=0.20), in-stent binary restenosis (BR) (risk ratio [RR]: 2.27 [0.99, 5.21], P=0.05) and in-segment BR (RR: 1.46 [0.78, 2.75], P=0.24). Regarding the 12-month clinical outcomes, there was a significant decrease in TLF and a trend of a lower incidence of target vessel failure (RR: 0.89 [0.78,1.01], P=0.08), myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel MI. CONCLUSIONS: With similar angiographic results, BP-SESs appeared to be superior to DP-DESs with better clinical prognoses, especially for female patients, patients with STEMI and ACS and patients without diabetes. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 187
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents versus biocompatible polymer everolimus-eluting stents: a meta-analysis
    Shang, Yong-Zhi
    Li, Bao-Yin
    Feng, Yan
    Liu, Jie-Yun
    Yang, Xiu-Ling
    Qin, Lei
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2017, 72 (02) : 196 - 204
  • [32] Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Biodegradable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stent to Second-Generation Durable Polymer Drug- Eluting Stents
    El-Hayek, Georges
    Bangalore, Sripal
    Dominguez, Abel Casso
    Devireddy, Chandan
    Jaber, Wissam
    Kumar, Gautam
    Mavromatis, Kreton
    Tamis-Holland, Jacqueline
    Samady, Habib
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (05) : 462 - 473
  • [33] Polymer-free versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis
    Wu, James J.
    Way, Joshua A. H.
    Kritharides, Leonard
    Brieger, David
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2019, 38 : 13 - 21
  • [34] A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare long-term clinical outcomes of bioabsorbable polymer and durable polymer drug-eluting stents
    Mridha, Naim
    Subhaharan, Deloshaan
    Niranjan, Selvanayagam
    Rashid, Mohammed K.
    Psaltis, Peter
    Singh, Kuljit
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-QUALITY OF CARE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES, 2019, 5 (02) : 105 - 113
  • [35] Outcomes of patients treated with ultrathin-strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus fluoropolymer-based everolimus-eluting stents: a meta- analysis of randomised trials
    Cassese, Salvatore
    Ndrepepa, Gjin
    Byrne, Robert A.
    Kufner, Sebastian
    Lahmann, Anna Lena
    Mankerious, Nader
    Xhepa, Erion
    Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig
    Schunkert, Heribert
    Fusaro, Massimiliano
    Kastrati, Adnan
    Joner, Michael
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2018, 14 (02) : 224 - 231
  • [36] NOBORI™ biodegradable-polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable-polymer drug-eluting stents: A meta-analysis
    Zhang, Yao-Jun
    Ye, Fei
    Iqbal, Javaid
    Dong, Sheng-Jie
    Bourantas, Christos V.
    Tian, Nai-Liang
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    Chen, Shao-Liang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 174 (01) : 151 - 153
  • [37] Cardiovascular outcomes associated with Ultrathin bioresorbable polymer sirolimus eluting stents versus thin, durable polymer everolimus eluting stents following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus A meta-analysis of published studies
    Deng, Shibing
    Yi, Xuying
    Tian, Zhiming
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (52)
  • [38] Biodegradable Polymer Versus Polymer-Free Ultrathin Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: Analysis of the Stent Arm Registry From the HOST-IDEA Randomized Trial
    Han, Jung-Kyu
    Yang, Seokhun
    Hwang, Doyeon
    Park, Sang-Hyeon
    Kang, Jeehoon
    Yang, Han-Mo
    Park, Kyung Woo
    Kang, Hyun-Jae
    Koo, Bon-Kwon
    Cho, Jin-Man
    Cho, Janghyun
    Bang, Duk Won
    Lee, Jae-Hwan
    Lee, Han Cheol
    Kim, Kyung-Jin
    Chun, Woo Jung
    Seo, Won-Woo
    Park, Woo-Jung
    Park, Sang Min
    Kim, Jin Won
    Kim, Hyo-Soo
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2024, 17 (07) : e013585
  • [39] Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents in Hemodialysis Patients
    Yachi, Sen
    Tanabe, Kengo
    Tanimoto, Shuzou
    Aoki, Jiro
    Nakazawa, Gaku
    Yamamoto, Hirosada
    Otsuki, Shuji
    Yagishita, Atsuhiko
    Kishi, Satoru
    Nakano, Masataka
    Taniwaki, Masahiro
    Sasaki, Shunsuke
    Nakajima, Hiroyoshi
    Mise, Naofumi
    Sugimoto, Tokuichiro
    Hara, Kazuhiro
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2009, 54 (02) : 299 - 306
  • [40] Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Implanted With Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents Versus New-Generation Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents: A Retrospective Analysis
    Choe, Jeong Cheon
    Cha, Kwang Soo
    Jang, Hye Yoon
    Choi, Jong Hyun
    Kim, Bo Won
    Ahn, Jinhee
    Park, Jin Sup
    Lee, Hye Won
    Oh, Jun-Hyok
    Choi, Jung Hyun
    Lee, Han Cheol
    Hong, Taek Jong
    Ahn, Youngkeun
    Jeong, Myung Ho
    ANGIOLOGY, 2017, 68 (08) : 698 - 706