Angiographic and clinical outcomes of patients implanted with ultrathin, biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

被引:0
|
作者
Liao, Chen [1 ,2 ]
Liao, Sen [3 ]
Liu, Miaoweng [2 ]
Xu, Ruoxin [2 ]
Peng, Jinhua [1 ]
Wei, Yiping [1 ]
Zhang, Wenxiong [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Affiliated Hosp 2, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Jiangxi Med Coll, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Nanchang Univ, FuZhou Med Coll, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Meta-analysis; Polymers; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Coronary artery disease; 5-YEAR OUTCOMES; NON-INFERIORITY; DESSOLVE III; THIN-STRUT; MULTICENTER; SAFETY; IV; QUALITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.23736/S0021-9509.20.11620-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Whether sirolimus-eluting stents constituted with ultrathin-strut and biodegradable polymers (BP-SESs) can achieve a preferable effect over current drug-eluting stents with durable polymers (DP-DESs) remains highly controversial. The aim of this analysis based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was to detect the clinical and angiographic differences between ultrathin (defined as a strut thickness <70 mu m) BP-SESs and DP-DESs. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We searched seven databases to identify eligible articles. Late lumen loss (LLL) and target lesion failure (TLF) were assessed as the primary endpoints for angiographic and clinical outcomes, respectively. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Nineteen articles containing thirteen RCTs with 14801 patients were analyzed. For the 9-month angiographic outcomes, similar results were discovered between BP-SESs and DP-DESs in terms of in-stent LLL (mean difference [MD]: -0.02 [-0.05, 0.01], P=0.23), in-segment LLL (MD: -0.01 [-0.04, 0.03], P=0.74), in-stent minimum lumen diameter (MLD) (MD: -0.01 [-0.06, 0.04], P=0.72), insegment MLD (MD: -0.01 [-0.06, 0.05], P=0.75), in-stent diameter stenosis (DS) (MD: -1.10 [-3.36, 1.15], P=0.34), in-segment DS (MD: -0.78 [-1.97, 0.40], P=0.20), in-stent binary restenosis (BR) (risk ratio [RR]: 2.27 [0.99, 5.21], P=0.05) and in-segment BR (RR: 1.46 [0.78, 2.75], P=0.24). Regarding the 12-month clinical outcomes, there was a significant decrease in TLF and a trend of a lower incidence of target vessel failure (RR: 0.89 [0.78,1.01], P=0.08), myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel MI. CONCLUSIONS: With similar angiographic results, BP-SESs appeared to be superior to DP-DESs with better clinical prognoses, especially for female patients, patients with STEMI and ACS and patients without diabetes. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 187
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and safety of biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: A meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Yang, Yunjing
    Lei, Jiayan
    Huang, Wei
    Lei, Han
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 222 : 486 - 493
  • [2] Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Zhu, Ping
    Zhou, Xin
    Zhang, Chenliang
    Li, Huakang
    Zhang, Zhihui
    Song, Zhiyuan
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2018, 18
  • [3] Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Ping Zhu
    Xin Zhou
    Chenliang Zhang
    Huakang Li
    Zhihui Zhang
    Zhiyuan Song
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 18
  • [4] Clinical Outcomes of Biodegradable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Updated Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Kwong, Joey S. W.
    Yu, Cheuk-Man
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 37 (07) : 440 - 453
  • [5] Ultrathin-strut biodegradable polymer versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis
    Monjur, Mohammad Riashad
    Said, Christian F.
    Bamford, Paul
    Parkinson, Michael
    Szirt, Richard
    Ford, Thomas
    OPEN HEART, 2020, 7 (02):
  • [6] Five-Year Outcomes of Biodegradable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Second-Generation Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Lou, Yake
    Yu, Ying
    Xi, Ziwei
    Gao, Yanan
    Liu, Wei
    Nie, Xiaomin
    CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS AND THERAPY, 2019, 33 (05) : 557 - 566
  • [7] Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents vs durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of individual patient data from 5 randomized trials
    Pilgrim, Thomas
    Rothenbuhler, Martina
    Siontis, George C. M.
    Kandzari, David E.
    Iglesias, Juan F.
    Asami, Masahiko
    Lefevre, Thierry
    Piccolo, Raffaele
    Koolen, Jacques
    Saito, Shigeru
    Slagboom, Ton
    Muller, Olivier
    Waksman, Ron
    Windecker, Stephan
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2021, 235 : 140 - 148
  • [8] Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents versus first-generation durable polymer drug-eluting stents A systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials
    Bundhun, Pravesh Kumar
    Pursun, Manish
    Huang, Feng
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (47)
  • [9] Ultrathin biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus contemporary durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent for percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Sethi, Ankur
    Kodumuri, Vamsi
    Prasad, Vinoy
    Kassotis, John
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2021, 32 (05) : 459 - 465
  • [10] Five-Year Outcomes of Biodegradable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Second-Generation Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Yake Lou
    Ying Yu
    Ziwei Xi
    Yanan Gao
    Wei Liu
    Xiaomin Nie
    Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, 2019, 33 : 557 - 566