The importance of cellular degradation kinetics for understanding mechanisms in targeted protein degradation

被引:30
作者
Riching, Kristin M. [1 ]
Caine, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
Urh, Marjeta [1 ]
Daniels, Danette L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Promega Corp, 5430 East Cheryl Dr, Madison, WI 53711 USA
[2] Foghorn Therapeut, 500 Technol Sq,Suite 700, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
ANTIBODY-MEDIATED DELIVERY; E3 UBIQUITIN LIGASES; STRUCTURAL BASIS; DESIGN; RECOGNITION; RECRUITMENT; CONJUGATION; ANTITUMOR; PROTACS; RBM39;
D O I
10.1039/d2cs00339b
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Targeted protein degradation has exploded over the past several years due to preclinical and early clinical therapeutic success of numerous compounds, and the emergence of new degradation modalities, which has broadened the definition of what a degrader is. The most characterized and well-studied small molecule degraders are molecular glues and proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs). These degraders induce a ternary complex between a target protein, degrader, and E3 ligase component, resulting in ubiquitination and subsequent degradation of the target protein via the ubiquitin proteasomal system (UPS). This event-driven process requires success at all steps through a complex cascade of events. As more systems, degraders, and targets are tested, it has become increasingly clear that achieving degradation is only the first critical milestone in a degrader development program. Rather highly efficacious degraders require a combination of multiple optimized parameters: rapid degradation, high potency, high maximal degradation (D-max), and sustained loss of target without re-dosing. Success to meet these more rigorous goals depends upon the ability to characterize and understand the dynamic cellular degradation profiles and relate them to the underlying mechanism for any given target treated with a specific concentration of degrader. From this starting point, optimization and fine tuning of multiple kinetic parameters such as how fast degradation occurs (the rate), how much of the target is degraded (the extent), and how long the target remains degraded (the duration) can be performed. In this review we explore the diversity of cellular kinetic degradation profiles which can arise after molecular glue and PROTAC treatment and the potential implications of these varying responses. As the overall degradation kinetics are a sum of individual mechanistic steps, each with their own kinetic contributions, we discuss the ways in which changes at any one of these steps could potentially influence the resultant kinetic degradation profiles. Looking forward, we address the importance in characterizing the kinetics of target protein loss in the early stages of degrader design and how this will enable more rapid discovery of therapeutic agents to elicit desired phenotypic outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:6210 / 6221
页数:12
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [51] Targeted protein degradation by PROTACs
    Neklesa, Taavi K.
    Winkler, James D.
    Crews, Craig M.
    [J]. PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 174 : 138 - 144
  • [52] Plasticity in binding confers selectivity in ligand-induced protein degradation
    Nowak, Radoslaw P.
    DeAngelo, Stephen L.
    Buckley, Dennis
    He, Zhixiang
    Donovan, Katherine A.
    An, Jian
    Safaee, Nozhat
    Jedrychowski, Mark P.
    Ponthier, Charles M.
    Ishoey, Mette
    Zhang, Tinghu
    Mancias, Joseph D.
    Gray, Nathanael S.
    Bradner, James E.
    Fischer, Eric S.
    [J]. NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 14 (07) : 706 - +
  • [53] Assessing Different E3 Ligases for Small Molecule Induced Protein Ubiquitination and Degradation
    Ottis, Philipp
    Toure, Momar
    Cromm, Philipp M.
    Ko, Eunhwa
    Gustafson, Jeffrey L.
    Crews, Craig M.
    [J]. ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2017, 12 (10) : 2570 - 2578
  • [54] Targeted protein degradation: elements of PROTAC design
    Paiva, Stacey-Lynn
    Crews, Craig M.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2019, 50 : 111 - 119
  • [55] Pettersson Mariell, 2019, Drug Discov Today Technol, V31, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.ddtec.2019.01.002
  • [56] Antibody Conjugation of a Chimeric BET Degrader Enables in vivo Activity
    Pillow, Thomas H.
    Adhikari, Pragya
    Blake, Robert A.
    Chen, Jinhua
    Del Rosario, Geoffrey
    Deshmukh, Gauri
    Figueroa, Isabel
    Gascoigne, Karen E.
    Kamath, Amrita, V
    Kaufman, Susan
    Kleinheinz, Tracy
    Kozak, Katherine R.
    Latifi, Brandon
    Leipold, Douglas D.
    Li, Chun Sing
    Li, Ruina
    Mulvihill, Melinda M.
    O'Donohue, Aimee
    Rowntree, Rebecca K.
    Sadowsky, Jack D.
    Wai, John
    Wang, Xinxin
    Wu, Cong
    Xu, Zijin
    Yao, Hui
    Yu, Shang-Fan
    Zhang, Donglu
    Zang, Richard
    Zhang, Hongyan
    Zhou, Hao
    Zhu, Xiaoyu
    Dragovich, Peter S.
    [J]. CHEMMEDCHEM, 2020, 15 (01) : 17 - 25
  • [57] Building ubiquitination machineries: E3 ligase multi-subunit assembly and substrate targeting by PROTACs and molecular glues
    Ramachandran, Sarath
    Ciulli, Alessio
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2021, 67 : 110 - 119
  • [58] High-Throughput Cellular Profiling of Targeted Protein Degradation Compounds using HiBiT CRISPR Cell Lines
    Riching, Kristin M.
    Mahan, Sarah D.
    Urh, Marjeta
    Daniels, Danette L.
    [J]. JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2020, (165):
  • [59] CDK Family PROTAC Profiling Reveals Distinct Kinetic Responses and Cell Cycle-Dependent Degradation of CDK2
    Riching, Kristin M.
    Schwinn, Marie K.
    Vasta, James D.
    Robers, Matthew B.
    Machleidt, Thomas
    Urh, Marjeta
    Daniels, Danette L.
    [J]. SLAS DISCOVERY, 2021, 26 (04) : 560 - 569
  • [60] Quantitative Live-Cell Kinetic Degradation and Mechanistic Profiling of PROTAC Mode of Action
    Riching, Kristin M.
    Mahan, Sarah
    Corona, Cesear R.
    McDougall, Mark
    Vasta, James D.
    Robers, Matthew B.
    Urh, Marjeta
    Daniels, Danette L.
    [J]. ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 13 (09) : 2758 - 2770