Spatial Contiguity and Spatial Split-Attention Effects in Multimedia Learning Environments: a Meta-Analysis

被引:94
作者
Schroeder, Noah L. [1 ]
Cenkci, Ada T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Wright State Univ, Dept Leadership Studies Educ & Org, 3640 Colonel Glenn Highway, Dayton, OH 45435 USA
[2] Northern Kentucky Univ, Dept Polit Sci Criminal Justice & Org Leadership, Nunn Dr, Highland Hts, KY 41099 USA
关键词
Spatial contiguity effect; Spatial contiguity principle; Split attention; Cognitive load; Meta-analysis; COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY; DESIGN; ILLUSTRATIONS; INFORMATION; REDUNDANCY; MATHEMATICS; PERFORMANCE; INTEGRATION; MANAGEMENT; EXAMPLES;
D O I
10.1007/s10648-018-9435-9
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Spatial split-attention effects have been noted in the research literature, where, under split-attention conditions, integrating text and diagrams has been shown to be effective. From this literature grew the spatial contiguity principle (or spatial contiguity effect), which states that people learn more when related words and pictures are displayed spatially near one another. Research has shown both effects to influence learning; however, little is known about the conditions in which integrated designs are most effective. This meta-analysis examines the influence of integrated designs across numerous moderator variables in order to improve our understanding of under which conditions integrated designs influence learning. A random effects meta-analysis of 58 independent comparisons (n = 2426) produced an overall effect size of g = 0.63 (p < 0.001). Moderator analyses indicated that integrated designs have benefited learning across many intervention-related and context-related moderator variables. Practical and theoretical implications of the findings are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 701
页数:23
相关论文
共 76 条
[61]   THE FILE DRAWER PROBLEM AND TOLERANCE FOR NULL RESULTS [J].
ROSENTHAL, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1979, 86 (03) :638-641
[62]   Explaining the Modality and Contiguity Effects: New Insights From Investigating Students' Viewing Behaviour [J].
Schmidt-Weigand, Florian ;
Kohnert, Alfred ;
Glowalla, Ulrich .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 24 (02) :226-237
[63]   Benefits of Guided Self-Management of Attention on Learning Accounting [J].
Sithole, Seedwell T. M. ;
Chandler, Paul ;
Abeysekera, Indra ;
Paas, Fred .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 109 (02) :220-232
[64]   Cognitive architecture and instructional design [J].
Sweller, J ;
van Merrienboer, JJG ;
Paas, FGWC .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1998, 10 (03) :251-296
[65]   WHY SOME MATERIAL IS DIFFICULT TO LEARN [J].
SWELLER, J ;
CHANDLER, P .
COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 1994, 12 (03) :185-233
[67]   COGNITIVE LOAD AS A FACTOR IN THE STRUCTURING OF TECHNICAL MATERIAL [J].
SWELLER, J ;
CHANDLER, P ;
TIERNEY, P ;
COOPER, M .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1990, 119 (02) :176-192
[68]   COGNITIVE LOAD DURING PROBLEM-SOLVING - EFFECTS ON LEARNING [J].
SWELLER, J .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 1988, 12 (02) :257-285
[69]  
Sweller J., 1994, Learn. Instr., V4, P295, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5, 10.1016/0959-4752, DOI 10.1016/0959-4752]
[70]  
Sweller J, 2011, EXPLOR LEARN SCI, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4