Population impact - Definition, calculation and its use in prevention science in the example of tobacco smoking reduction

被引:18
作者
Thyrian, Jochen Rene
John, Ulrich
机构
[1] Ernst Moritz Arndt Univ Greifswald, Inst Epidemiol & Social Med, D-17489 Greifswald, Germany
[2] Ernst Moritz Arndt Univ Greifswald, Inst epidemiol & Social Med, D-17489 Greifswald, Germany
关键词
population impact; prevention; smoking; public health;
D O I
10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.10.001
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Population Impact is a criterion that can enhance prevention practices and provide a solid foundation for integrating policies and programs for prevention. However, to quantify the population impact of programs a statistical measure is needed. The objective of this article is to (a) deduct a formula to quantify population impact (PI), (b) define the formula for population impact of smoking prevention measures and (c) apply this formula on smoking prevention programs. Methods: Decision analytical approach. Results: The measurement of PI is defined with four parameters: recruitment, retention, efficacy and prevalence. A formula is mathematically deducted and the PI for different smoking prevention programs is calculated. Discussion: The formula supports decision makers in deciding what prevention measure shows a higher impact on the population, gives hints where to improve the measure to increase the impact, whether recruitment, retention or efficacy needs to be improved and makes it easy to do analyses of costs on the population level. Conclusions: To enhance prevention practice prevention measures need to provide all parameters to calculate the PI, research needs to focus on all parameters influencing the PI and costs of prevention measures need to be provided. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 356
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [21] Counselor and stimulus control enhancements of a stage-matched expert system intervention for smokers in a managed care setting
    Prochaska, JO
    Velicer, WF
    Fava, JL
    Ruggiero, L
    Laforge, RG
    Rossi, JS
    Johnson, SS
    Lee, PA
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2001, 32 (01) : 23 - 32
  • [22] Evaluating a population-based recruitment approach and a stage-based expert system intervention for smoking cessation
    Prochaska, JO
    Velicer, WF
    Fava, JL
    Rossi, JS
    Tsoh, JY
    [J]. ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2001, 26 (04) : 583 - 602
  • [23] SECERWALKER R, 2002, COCHRANE DB SYST REV
  • [24] Measuring activities in tobacco control across the EU. The MAToC
    Thyrian, Jochen Rene
    John, Ulrich
    [J]. SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT PREVENTION AND POLICY, 2006, 1 (1)
  • [25] Challenges for model-based economic evaluations of postmenopausal osteoporosis interventions
    Tosteson, ANA
    Jönsson, B
    Grima, DT
    O'Brien, BJ
    Black, DM
    Adachi, JD
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 12 (10) : 849 - 857
  • [26] Tailored communications for smoking cessation: past successes and future directions
    Velicer, WF
    Prochaska, JO
    Redding, CA
    [J]. DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW, 2006, 25 (01) : 49 - 57
  • [27] Comparing participants and nonparticipants recruited for an effectiveness study of nicotine replacement therapy
    Velicer, WF
    Keller, S
    Friedman, RH
    Fava, JL
    Gulliver, SB
    Ward, RM
    Ramelson, H
    Prochaska, JO
    Cottrill, SD
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2005, 29 (03) : 181 - 191
  • [28] An expert system intervention for smoking cessation
    Velicer, WF
    Prochaska, JO
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 1999, 36 (02) : 119 - 129
  • [29] VELICER WF, 1993, TOBACCO CONTROL, P95
  • [30] BRIEF REPORT: The burden of diabetes therapy - Implications for the design of effective patient-centered treatment regimens
    Vijan, S
    Hayward, RA
    Ronis, DL
    Hofer, TP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 20 (05) : 479 - 482