Population impact - Definition, calculation and its use in prevention science in the example of tobacco smoking reduction

被引:18
作者
Thyrian, Jochen Rene
John, Ulrich
机构
[1] Ernst Moritz Arndt Univ Greifswald, Inst Epidemiol & Social Med, D-17489 Greifswald, Germany
[2] Ernst Moritz Arndt Univ Greifswald, Inst epidemiol & Social Med, D-17489 Greifswald, Germany
关键词
population impact; prevention; smoking; public health;
D O I
10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.10.001
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Population Impact is a criterion that can enhance prevention practices and provide a solid foundation for integrating policies and programs for prevention. However, to quantify the population impact of programs a statistical measure is needed. The objective of this article is to (a) deduct a formula to quantify population impact (PI), (b) define the formula for population impact of smoking prevention measures and (c) apply this formula on smoking prevention programs. Methods: Decision analytical approach. Results: The measurement of PI is defined with four parameters: recruitment, retention, efficacy and prevalence. A formula is mathematically deducted and the PI for different smoking prevention programs is calculated. Discussion: The formula supports decision makers in deciding what prevention measure shows a higher impact on the population, gives hints where to improve the measure to increase the impact, whether recruitment, retention or efficacy needs to be improved and makes it easy to do analyses of costs on the population level. Conclusions: To enhance prevention practice prevention measures need to provide all parameters to calculate the PI, research needs to focus on all parameters influencing the PI and costs of prevention measures need to be provided. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 356
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] African American smokers interested and eligible for a smoking cessation clinical trial: Predictors of not returning for randomization
    Ahluwalia, JS
    Richter, K
    Mayo, MS
    Ahluwalia, HK
    Choi, WS
    Schmelzle, KH
    Resnicow, K
    [J]. ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (03) : 206 - 212
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2002, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
  • [3] [Anonymous], CURB EP GOV EC TOB C
  • [4] Association of the California tobacco control program with declines in lung cancer incidence
    Barnoya, J
    Glantz, S
    [J]. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2004, 15 (07) : 689 - 695
  • [5] A systematic review of the associations between dose regimens and medication compliance
    Claxton, AJ
    Cramer, J
    Pierce, C
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 23 (08) : 1296 - 1310
  • [6] A systematic review of adherence with medications for diabetes
    Cramer, JA
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2004, 27 (05) : 1218 - 1224
  • [7] Critchley J, 2003, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD003041.pub2
  • [8] Behavior change intervention research in community settings: how generalizable are the results?
    Dzewaltowski, DA
    Estabrooks, PA
    Klesges, LM
    Bull, S
    Glasgow, RE
    [J]. HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 19 (02) : 235 - 245
  • [9] Estimates of global mortality attributable to smoking in 2000
    Ezzati, M
    Lopez, AD
    [J]. LANCET, 2003, 362 (9387) : 847 - 852
  • [10] Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination
    Flay, BR
    Biglan, A
    Boruch, RF
    Castro, FG
    Gottfredson, D
    Kellam, S
    Moscicki, EK
    Schinke, S
    Valentine, JC
    Ji, P
    [J]. PREVENTION SCIENCE, 2005, 6 (03) : 151 - 175