Peer video feedback builds basic life support skills: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial

被引:7
作者
Sopka, Sasa [1 ,2 ]
Hahn, Fabian [1 ]
Vogt, Lina [1 ,2 ]
Pears, Kim Hannah [1 ]
Rossaint, Rolf [2 ]
Rudolph, Jenny [3 ]
Klasen, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, AIXTRA Competency Ctr Training & Patient Safety, Med Fac, Aachen, Germany
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Univ Hosp Aachen, Dept Anaesthesiol, Med Fac, Aachen, Germany
[3] Ctr Med Simulat, Boston, MA USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 07期
关键词
ENTRUSTABLE PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES; KIDS SAVE LIVES; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; EUROPEAN-RESUSCITATION; COUNCIL GUIDELINES; EDUCATION; NONINFERIORITY; EQUIVALENCE; KNOWLEDGE; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0254923
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Introduction Training Basic Life Support saves lives. However, current BLS training approaches are time-consuming and costly. Alternative cost-efficient and effective training methods are highly needed. The present study evaluated whether a video-feedback supported peer-guided Basic Life Support training approach achieves similar practical performance as a standard instructor-guided training in laypersons. Methods In a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, 288 first-year medical students were randomized to two study arms with different Basic Life Support training methods: 1) Standard Instructor Feedback (SIF) or 2) a Peer Video Feedback (PVF). Outcome parameters were objective data for Basic Life Support performance (compression depth and rate) from a resuscitation manikin with recording software as well as overall Basic Life Support performance and subjective confidence. Non-inferiority margins (Delta) for these outcome parameters and sample size calculation were based on previous studies with Standard Instructor Feedback. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals were employed to determine significance of non-inferiority. Results Results confirmed non-inferiority of Peer Video Feedback to Standard Instructor Feedback for compression depth (proportion difference PVF-SIF = 2.9%; 95% CI: -8.2% to 14.1%; Delta = -19%), overall Basic Life Support performance (proportion difference PVF-SIF = 6.7%; 95% CI: 0.0% to 14.3%; Delta = -27%) and subjective confidence for CPR performance (proportion difference PVF-SIF = -0.01; 95% CI: -0.18-0.17; Delta = -0.5) and emergency situations (proportion difference PVF-SIF = -0.02; 95% CI: -0.21-0.18; Delta = -0.5). Results for compression rate were inconclusive. Discussion Peer Video Feedback achieves comparable results as standard instructor-based training methods. It is an easy-to-apply and cost-efficient alternative to standard Basic Life Support training methods. To improve performance with respect to compression rate, additional implementation of a metronome is recommended.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2003, STAT MED, V22, P3111, DOI [10.1002/sim.1564, DOI 10.1002/SIM.1564]
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, Power calculator for continuous outcome non-inferiority trial
  • [3] Mandatory cardiopulmonary resuscitation competencies for undergraduate healthcare students in Europe A European Resuscitation Council guidance note
    Baldi, Enrico
    Savastano, Simone
    Contri, Enrico
    Lockey, Andrew
    Conaghan, Patricia
    Hulme, Jonathan
    Cimpoesu, Diana
    Maconochie, Ian
    Bottiger, Bernd W.
    Greif, Robert
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 37 (10) : 839 - 841
  • [4] Final-year medical students' knowledge of cardiac arrest and CPR: We must do more!
    Baldi, Enrico
    Contri, Enrico
    Bailoni, Alessandra
    Rendic, Kristina
    Turcan, Valeria
    Donchev, Nikola
    Nadareishvili, Ilia
    Petrica, Ana-Maria
    Yerolemidou, Irene
    Petrenko, Anastasiia
    Franke, Johannes
    Labbe, Gabrielle
    Jashari, Redon
    Dali, Alba Perez
    Borg, Jordy
    Hertenberger, Niklas
    Boettiger, BerndW.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 296 : 76 - 80
  • [5] Real-time visual feedback during training improves laypersons' CPR quality: a randomized controlled manikin study
    Baldi, Enrico
    Cornara, Stefano
    Contri, Enrico
    Epis, Francesco
    Fina, Dario
    Zelaschi, Beatrice
    Dossena, Cinzia
    Fichtner, Ferdinando
    Tonani, Michela
    DiMaggio, Marzia
    Zambaiti, Elisa
    Somaschini, Alberto
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 19 (06) : 480 - 487
  • [6] Bandura A., 1971, SOCIAL LEARNING THEO
  • [7] Peer education for BLS-training in schools? Results of a randomized-controlled, noninferiority trial
    Beck, Stefanie
    Issleib, Malte
    Daubmann, Anne
    Zoellner, Christian
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2015, 94 : 85 - 90
  • [8] Entrustable Professional Activities in final year undergraduate medical training - advancement of the final year training logbook in Germany
    Berberat, Pascal O.
    Rotthoff, Thomas
    Baerwald, Christoph
    Ehrhardt, Maren
    Huenges, Bert
    Johannink, Jonas
    Narciss, Elisabeth
    Obertacke, Udo
    Peters, Harm
    Kadmon, Martina
    [J]. GMS JOURNAL FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 36 (06):
  • [9] PROVING THE NULL HYPOTHESIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS
    BLACKWELDER, WC
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1982, 3 (04): : 345 - 353
  • [10] KIDS SAVE LIVES: School children education in resuscitation for Europe and the world
    Boettiger, Bernd W.
    Semeraro, Federico
    Altemeyer, Karl-Heinz
    Breckwoldt, Jan
    Kreimeier, Uwe
    Ruecker, Gernot
    Andres, Janusz
    Lockey, Andrew
    Lippert, Freddy K.
    Georgiou, Marios
    Wingen, Sabine
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2017, 34 (12) : 792 - 796