Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in slab phantoms with cortical bone equivalent heterogeneities

被引:46
作者
Carrasco, P.
Jornet, N.
Duch, M. A.
Panettieri, V.
Weber, L.
Eudaldo, T.
Ginjaume, M.
Ribas, M.
机构
[1] Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Barcelona 08025, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Inst Tecn Energet, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Lund Hosp, Dept Radiat Phys, SE-22185 Lund, Sweden
关键词
heterogeneity correction; calculation algorithms; bone correction; treatment planning systems;
D O I
10.1118/1.2750972
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To evaluate the dose values predicted by several calculation algorithms in two treatment planning systems, Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and measurements by means of various detectors were performed in heterogeneous layer phantoms with water- and bone-equivalent materials. Percentage depth doses (PDDs) were measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs), metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs), plane parallel and cylindrical ionization chambers, and beam profiles with films. The MC code used for the simulations was the PENELOPE code. Three different field sizes (10 X 10, 5 X 5, and 2 X 2 cm 2) were studied in two phantom configurations and a bone equivalent material. These two phantom configurations contained heterogeneities of 5 and 2 cm of bone, respectively. We analyzed the performance of four correction-based algorithms and one based on convolution superposition. The correction-based algorithms were the Batho, the Modified Batho, the Equivalent TAR implemented in the Cadplan (Varian) treatment planning system (TPS), and the Helax-TMS Pencil Beam from the Helax-TMS (Nucletron) TPS. The convolution-superposition algorithm was the Collapsed Cone implemented in the Helax-TMS. All the correction-based calculation algorithms underestimated the dose inside the bone-equivalent material for 18 MV compared to MC simulations. The maximum underestimation, in terms of root-mean-square (RMS), was about 15% for the Helax-TMS Pencil Beam (Helax-TMS PB) for a 2 X 2 cm2 field inside the bone-equivalent material. In contrast, the Collapsed Cone algorithm yielded values around 3%. A more complex behavior was found for 6 MV where the Collapsed Cone performed less well, overestimating the dose inside the heterogeneity in 3%-5%. The rebuildup in the interface bone-water and the penumbra shrinking in high-density media were not predicted by any of the calculation algorithms except the Collapsed Cone, and only the MC simulations matched the experimental values within the estimated uncertainties. The TLD and MOSFET detectors were suitable for dose measurement inside bone-equivalent materials, while parallel ionization chambers, applying the same calibration and correction factors as in water, systematically underestimated dose by 3%-5%. (c) 2007 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:3323 / 3333
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
[31]   THE INFLUENCE OF AIR CAVITIES ON INTERFACE DOSES FOR PHOTON BEAMS [J].
KLEIN, EE ;
CHIN, LM ;
RICE, RK ;
MIJNHEER, BJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1993, 27 (02) :419-427
[32]   LIMITATIONS OF A PENCIL BEAM APPROACH TO PHOTON DOSE CALCULATIONS IN LUNG-TISSUE [J].
KNOOS, T ;
AHNESJO, A ;
NILSSON, P ;
WEBER, L .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1995, 40 (09) :1411-1420
[33]   A METHOD FOR CONVERSION OF HOUNSFIELD NUMBER TO ELECTRON-DENSITY AND PREDICTION OF MACROSCOPIC PAIR PRODUCTION CROSS-SECTIONS [J].
KNOOS, T ;
NILSSON, M ;
AHLGREN, L .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1986, 5 (04) :337-345
[34]   LUNG DOSE CORRECTIONS FOR 6-MV AND 15-MV X-RAYS [J].
MACKIE, TR ;
ELKHATIB, E ;
BATTISTA, J ;
SCRIMGER, J ;
VANDYK, J ;
CUNNINGHAM, JR .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1985, 12 (03) :327-332
[35]  
Mijnheer B, 2004, Quality assurance of treatment planning systems and practical examples for non-imrt photon beams
[36]   Backscatter dose from metallic materials due to obliquely incident high-energy photon beams [J].
Nadrowitz, R ;
Feyerabend, T .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (06) :959-965
[37]   Dosimetric verification of a commercial collapsed cone algorithm in simulated clinical situations [J].
Nisbet, A ;
Beange, I ;
Vollmar, HS ;
Irvine, C ;
Morgan, A ;
Thwaites, DI .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 73 (01) :79-88
[38]  
Papanikolaou N, 2004, AAPM Report No. 85, V65, P1, DOI DOI 10.37206/86
[39]   A HETEROGENEITY MODEL FOR PHOTON BEAMS INCORPORATING ELECTRON-TRANSPORT [J].
PETTI, PL ;
RICE, RK ;
MIJNHEER, BJ ;
CHIN, LM ;
BJARNGARD, BE .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1987, 14 (03) :349-354
[40]   Dosimetric considerations for patients with HIP prostheses undergoing pelvic irradiation. Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 63 [J].
Reft, C ;
Alecu, R ;
Das, IJ ;
Gerbi, BJ ;
Keall, P ;
Lief, E ;
Mijnheer, BJ ;
Papanikolaou, N ;
Sibata, C ;
Van Dyk, J .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (06) :1162-1182