Colleagues as Change Agents: How Department Networks and Opinion Leaders Influence Teaching at a Single Research University

被引:36
作者
Andrews, T. C. [1 ]
Conaway, E. P. [1 ]
Zhao, J. [2 ]
Dolan, E. L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Genet, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Dept Sociol, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Texas Inst Discovery Educ Sci, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
PROMOTING INSTRUCTIONAL-CHANGE; SCIENCE FACULTY; COMMUNITY; COHESION; SUPPORT; MODELS;
D O I
10.1187/cbe.15-08-0170
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Relationships with colleagues have the potential to be a source of support for faculty to make meaningful change in how they teach, but the impact of these relationships is poorly understood. We used a mixed-methods approach to investigate the characteristics of faculty who provide colleagues with teaching resources and facilitate change in teaching, how faculty influence one another. Our exploratory investigation was informed by social network theory and research on the impact of opinion leaders within organizations. We used surveys and interviews to examine collegial interactions about undergraduate teaching in life sciences departments at one research university. Each department included discipline-based education researchers (DBERs). Quantitative and qualitative analyses indicate that DBERs promote changes in teaching to a greater degree than other departmental colleagues. The influence of DBERs derives, at least partly, from a perception that they have unique professional expertise in education. DBERs facilitated change through coteaching, offering ready and approachable access to education research, and providing teaching training and mentoring. Faculty who had participated in a team based-teaching professional development program were also credited with providing more support for teaching than nonparticipants. Further research will be necessary to determine whether these results generalize beyond the studied institution.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
American Academy for the Advancement of Science, 2011, VIS CHANG UND BIOL E
[2]   It's Personal: Biology Instructors Prioritize Personal Evidence over Empirical Evidence in Teaching Decisions [J].
Andrews, Tessa C. ;
Lemons, Paula P. .
CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2015, 14 (01)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Diffusion of Innovations
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Int. J. Teach. Learning Higher Educ, DOI DOI 10.1080/0034340042000280910
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering
[6]  
Austin A.E., 1996, Faculty teaching and research: Is there a Conflict, P57, DOI DOI 10.1002/IR.37019969009
[7]   Preparing the next generation of faculty - Graduate school as socialization to the academic career [J].
Austin, AE .
JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 2002, 73 (01) :94-+
[8]  
Beach AndreaL., 2008, To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development, V26, P199, DOI 10.1002/j.2334-4822.2008.tb00509.x
[9]   A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks [J].
Borgatti, SP ;
Cross, R .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2003, 49 (04) :432-445
[10]  
Borgatti SP, 2003, J APPL BEHAV SCI, V39, P337, DOI [10.1177/0021886303258111, DOI 10.1177/0021886303258111]