Refined Analysis of Prostate-specific Antigen Kinetics to Predict Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Outcomes

被引:34
作者
Cooperberg, Matthew R. [1 ,2 ]
Brooks, James D. [3 ]
Faino, Anna, V [4 ]
Newcomb, Lisa F. [5 ,6 ]
Kearns, James T. [6 ]
Carroll, Peter R. [1 ]
Dash, Atreya [6 ]
Etzioni, Ruth [4 ]
Fabrizio, Michael D. [7 ]
Gleave, Martin E. [8 ]
Morgan, Todd M. [9 ]
Nelson, Peter S. [10 ]
Thompson, Ian M. [11 ]
Wagner, Andrew A. [12 ]
Lin, Daniel W. [5 ,6 ]
Zheng, Yingye [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Urol, Helen Diller Family Comprehens Canc Ctr, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Urol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Publ Hlth Sci, Biostat Program, 1124 Columbia St, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[5] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Publ Hlth Sci, Canc Prevent Program, 1124 Columbia St, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[6] Univ Washington, Dept Urol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[7] Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Dept Urol, Virginia Beach, VA USA
[8] Univ British Columbia, Dept Urol Sci, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[9] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[10] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Div Human Biol, 1124 Columbia St, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[11] CHRISTUS Med Ctr Hosp, San Antonio, TX USA
[12] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Urol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
Prostate-specific antigen; Kinetics; Prostate cancer; Active surveillance; Outcomes; FOLLOW-UP; MEN; RECOMMENDATIONS; VELOCITY; BIOPSY; COHORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.017
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: For men on active surveillance for prostate cancer, utility of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics (PSAk) in predicting pathologic reclassification remains controversial. Objective: To develop prediction methods for utilizing serial PSA and evaluate frequency of collection. Design, setting, and participants: Data were collected from men enrolled in the multicenter Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study, for whom PSA data were measured and biopsies performed on prespecified schedules. We developed a PSAk parameter based on a linear mixed-effect model (LMEM) that accounted for serial PSA levels. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The association of diagnostic PSA and/or PSAk with time to reclassification (increase in cancer grade and/or volume) was evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Results and limitations: A total of 851 men met the study criteria; 255 (30%) had a reclassification event within 5 yr. Median follow-upwas 3.7 yr. After adjusting for prostate size, time since diagnosis, biopsy parameters, and diagnostic PSA, PSAk was a significant predictor of reclassification (hazard ratio for each 0.10 increase in PSAk = 1.6 [95% confidence interval 1.2-2.1, p < 0.001]). The PSAk model improved stratification of risk prediction for the top and bottom deciles of risk over a model without PSAk. Model performance was essentially identical using PSA data measured every 6 mo to those measured every 3 mo. The major limitation is the reliability of reclassification as an end point, although it drives most treatment decisions. Conclusions: PSAk calculated using an LMEM statistically significantly predicts biopsy reclassification. Models that use repeat PSA measurements outperform a model incorporating only diagnostic PSA. Model performance is similar using PSA assessed every 3 or 6 mo. If validated, these results should inform optimal incorporation of PSA trends into active surveillance protocols and risk calculators. Patient summary: In this report, we looked at whether repeat prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements, or PSA kinetics, improve prediction of biopsy outcomes in men using active surveillance to manage localized prostate cancer. We found that in a large multicenter active surveillance cohort, PSA kinetics improves the prediction of surveillance biopsy outcome. (C) 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 217
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [11] The Potential Impact of Reproducibility of Gleason Grading in Men With Early Stage Prostate Cancer Managed by Active Surveillance: A Multi-Institutional Study
    McKenney, Jesse K.
    Simko, Jeff
    Bonham, Michael
    True, Lawrence D.
    Troyer, Dean
    Hawley, Sarah
    Newcomb, Lisa F.
    Fazli, Ladan
    Kunju, Lakshmi P.
    Nicolas, Marlo M.
    Vakar-Lopez, Funda
    Zhang, Xiaotun
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Brooks, James D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (02) : 465 - 469
  • [12] McShane LM, 2005, NAT CLIN PRACT ONCOL, V2, P416, DOI 10.1038/ncponc0252
  • [13] Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer in the Prospective, Multi-Institutional Canary PASS Cohort
    Newcomb, Lisa F.
    Thompson, Ian M., Jr.
    Boyer, Hilary D.
    Brooks, James D.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Dash, Atreya
    Ellis, William J.
    Fazli, Ladan
    Feng, Ziding
    Gleave, Martin E.
    Kunju, Priya
    Lance, Raymond S.
    McKenney, Jesse K.
    Meng, Maxwell V.
    Nicolas, Marlo M.
    Sanda, Martin G.
    Simko, Jeffry
    So, Alan
    Tretiakova, Maria S.
    Troyer, Dean A.
    True, Lawrence D.
    Vakar-Lopez, Funda
    Virgin, Jeff
    Wagner, Andrew A.
    Wei, John T.
    Zheng, Yingye
    Nelson, Peter S.
    Lin, Daniel W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (02) : 313 - 320
  • [14] Changes in Prostate Cancer Grade on Serial Biopsy in Men Undergoing Active Surveillance
    Porten, Sima P.
    Whitson, Jared M.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Perez, Nannette
    Greene, Kirsten L.
    Meng, Maxwell V.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (20) : 2795 - 2800
  • [15] Prostate-Specific Antigen Kinetics During Follow-Up Are an Unreliable Trigger for Intervention in a Prostate Cancer Surveillance Program
    Ross, Ashley E.
    Loeb, Stacy
    Landis, Patricia
    Partin, Alan W.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Kettermann, Anna
    Feng, Zhaoyong
    Walsh, Patrick C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (17) : 2810 - 2816
  • [16] Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: Recommendations of the prostate cancer clinical trials working group
    Scher, Howard I.
    Halabi, Susan
    Tannock, Ian
    Morris, Michael
    Sternberg, Cora N.
    Carducci, Michael A.
    Eisenberger, Mario A.
    Higano, Celestia
    Bubley, Glenn J.
    Dreicer, Robert
    Petrylak, Daniel
    Kantoff, Philip
    Basch, Ethan
    Kelly, William Kevin
    Figg, William D.
    Small, Eric J.
    Beer, Tomasz M.
    Wilding, George
    Martin, Alison
    Hussain, Maha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (07) : 1148 - 1159
  • [17] Prostate-specific antigen kinetics in clinical decision-making during active surveillance for early prostate cancer -: A review
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    Roemeling, Stijn
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Wolters, Tineke
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (03) : 505 - 516
  • [18] An Empirical Evaluation of Guidelines on Prostate-specific Antigen Velocity in Prostate Cancer Detection
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Till, Cathee
    Tangen, Catherine M.
    Lilja, Hans
    Thompson, Ian M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2011, 103 (06) : 462 - 469
  • [19] The Relationship Between Prostate Specific Antigen Change and Biopsy Progression in Patients on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
    Whitson, Jared M.
    Porten, Sima P.
    Hilton, Joan F.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Perez, Nannette
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Greene, Kirsten L.
    Meng, Maxwell V.
    Simko, Jeff P.
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Carroll, Peter R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (05) : 1656 - 1660
  • [20] Contemporary Use of Initial Active Surveillance Among Men in Michigan with Low-risk Prostate Cancer
    Womble, Paul R.
    Montie, James E.
    Ye, Zaojun
    Linsell, Susan M.
    Lane, Brian R.
    Miller, David C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (01) : 44 - 50