Strategies for tropical forest protection and sustainable supply chains: challenges and opportunities for alignment with the UN sustainable development goals

被引:19
作者
Delabre, Izabela [1 ]
Alexander, Anthony [1 ]
Rodrigues, Camila [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Sussex Sustainabil Res Programme, Brighton BN1 9SL, E Sussex, England
[2] Inst Ctr Vida, Av Ariosto da Riva,3473 St E, BR-78580000 Alta Floresta, MT, Brazil
关键词
Sustainable supply chain management; UN sustainable development goals; Tropical forest protection; Sustainability; Non-state governance; ROUND-TABLES; GOVERNANCE; STATE; STANDARDS; GOVERNMENTALITY; TRANSFORMATION; DEFORESTATION; DYNAMICS; BUSINESS; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1007/s11625-019-00747-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Governance for sustainable development increasingly involves diverse stakeholder groups, with the promise of enhanced legitimacy and effectiveness in decision-making and implementation. The UN sustainable development goals (SDGs) emphasise the important role of multiple (non-state) actors, including businesses and non-governmental organisations, including in efforts to ensure the sustainability of supply chains, and to reduce tropical deforestation and forest degradation. This paper critically analyses sustainability strategies to examine how the UN SDG agendas related to 'sustainable supply chains' and 'tropical forest protection' are framed and enacted by two contrasting non-state actors: (1) Instituto Centro de Vida (ICV), an NGO in Brazil working to address deforestation, including by supporting farmers to produce commodities, and (2) Unilever, a global consumer goods manufacturer and major buyer of such commodities. By identifying areas of variability in the discursive techniques used by ICV and Unilever, we unearth particular power dynamics that can shape the processes and outcomes of sustainability strategies. This paper finds that the two organisations use diverse strategies at different levels of governance, both participate actively in multi-stakeholder forums to advance their organisations' goals, but have divergent framings of 'sustainability'. Despite being considered 'non-state' actors, the strategies of the two organisations examined both reflect, and influence, the structural effects of the state in the implementation of non-state organisations' strategies, and progress towards the SDGs. Although there is alignment of certain strategies related to tropical forest protection, in some cases, there is a risk that more sustainable, alternative approaches to governing forests and supply chains may be excluded.
引用
收藏
页码:1637 / 1651
页数:15
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
ALENCASTRO C, 2019, GLOBO
[2]   A decision theory perspective on complexity in performance measurement and management [J].
Alexander, Anthony ;
Kumar, Maneesh ;
Walker, Helen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2018, 38 (11) :2214-2244
[3]  
*ALTH, 2019, NOVO CAMP PROGR SUST
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, PROT OUR FOR
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, 2017 Was the Second-Worst Year on Record for Tropical Tree Cover Loss
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, DOI [10.1080/15239080500339646, DOI 10.1080/15239080500339646]
[7]  
Backstrand K., 2006, European Environment, V16, P290, DOI 10.1002/eet.425
[8]  
Bäckstrand K, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT, V6, P50
[9]  
BAKKER P, 2018, CHAMPION CHANGE
[10]   Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature [J].
Banerjee, SB .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2003, 24 (01) :143-180