Plain films are not accurate in planning internal fixation in vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures and in distinguishing between subtypes B1 And B2

被引:2
|
作者
Cinotti, Gianluca [1 ]
Sinno, Ennio [1 ]
Fornara, Gianluca [1 ]
LaTorre, Giuseppe [2 ]
Giannicola, Giuseppe [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Anat Histol Forens Med & Orthopaed Sci, Piazzale Aldo Moro, I-00185 Rome 5, Italy
[2] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Publ Hlth & Infect Dis, Piazzale Aldo Moro, I-00185 Rome 5, Italy
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2021年 / 52卷 / 06期
关键词
Peri-prosthetic fracture; Vancouver Type B; Total hip; Femoral osteosynthesis; REVISION HIP; CLASSIFICATION; ARTHROPLASTY; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; FEMUR;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2020.12.013
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: While few studies analysed the diagnostic validity of preoperative radiographs in distinguishing between Vancouver type B1 and B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs), no investigation has been conducted to assess the degree of diagnostic validity of preoperative radiographs in identifying the fracture course and planning the most appropriate treatment. We analysed the diagnostic validity of radiographs in detecting the fracture course and stem stability in Vancouver type B PFFs. Methods: Vancouver type B PFFs with different fracture courses were randomly performed in 36 dried cadaveric femurs in which a femoral broach had previously been implanted. Radiographic images, taken in the coronal and sagittal views, were analysed by 5 orthopaedic surgeons and 2 radiologists who were asked to reproduce the fracture course and to evaluate stem stability. A scoring system was used to determine the injured femoral cortex correctly identified by the examiners. Results: The identification of the fracture course was scored as poor in 52.4% and 56.%, fair in 23% and 23.4% and good in 24.6% and 19.8%, The identification of the fracture course in the coronal and axial vies radiographs was scored in coronal and axial view radiographs respectively. There was no significant difference in the average score obtained by senior and young examiners. In the coronal plane, the fracture course was poorly identified by all examiners in 11 (30.5%) femurs and by 5 or more examiners in 17 (47%). The fracture course was correctly identified by 5 or more examiners in 8 femurs (22%). A vertical fracture involving an emidiaphysis was found in 8 of the 11 femurs in which the PFF was poorly diagnosed by all examiners. Stem instability was correctly diagnosed in 45% of cases. Conclusions: In type B PFFs preoperative radiographs show a reduced diagnostic validity in identifying the fracture course and, hence, in planning a correct treatment. Potentially unstable vertical fractures involving an emidiaphysis are likely to be poorly diagnosed since most of the fracture course is hidden by the femoral stem. In cementless stems the diagnostic validity of radiographs in diagnosing between Vancouver type B1 and B2 seems to be lower than that reported for cemented stems. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1592 / 1596
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Outcomes After Operative Fixation of Vancouver B2 and B3 Type Periprosthetic Fractures
    Barghi, Ameen
    Hanna, Philip
    Merchan, Nelson
    Lechtig, Aron
    Haggerty, Christopher
    Weaver, Michael J.
    von Keudell, Arvind
    Wixted, John
    Appleton, Paul
    Rodriguez, Edward
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2022, 36 (05) : 228 - 233
  • [22] A systematic review of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures
    Khan, T.
    Grindlay, D.
    Ollivere, B. J.
    Scammell, B. E.
    Manktelow, A. R. J.
    Pearson, R. G.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2017, 99B (04): : 17 - 25
  • [23] Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Vancouver Type B2: Revision Arthroplasty Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation With Locking Compression Plate
    Baum, C.
    Leimbacher, M.
    Kriechling, P.
    Platz, A.
    Cadosch, D.
    GERIATRIC ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY & REHABILITATION, 2019, 10
  • [24] The effect of onlay cortical fibula strut grafts on biomechanical features of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures
    Aliyev, Orkhan
    Erden, Tunay
    Sariyilmaz, Kerim
    Bozdag, Ergun
    Sunbuloglu, Emin
    Tuncay, Ibrahim
    Yildiz, Fatih
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2022, 56 (03) : 166 - 172
  • [25] Comparative study of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fractures treated by internal fixation versus stem revision
    Martinov, Sagi
    D'ulisse, Sebastien
    Haumont, Edouard
    Schiopu, Dragos
    Reynders, Pieter
    Illes, Tamas
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2022, 142 (12) : 3589 - 3597
  • [26] The management of type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: when to fix and when to revise
    Yasen, Adam T.
    Haddad, Fares S.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 39 (09) : 1873 - 1879
  • [27] The management of type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: when to fix and when to revise
    Adam T. Yasen
    Fares S. Haddad
    International Orthopaedics, 2015, 39 : 1873 - 1879
  • [28] Double plating in Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic proximal femur fractures: A biomechanical study
    Waehnert, Dirk
    Grueneweller, Niklas
    Gehweiler, Dominic
    Brunn, Benjamin
    Raschke, Michael J.
    Stange, Richard
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2017, 35 (02) : 234 - 239
  • [29] Treatment of B1 Distal Periprosthetic Femur Fractures
    Sheridan, Gerard A.
    Sepehri, Aresh
    Stoffel, Karl
    Masri, Bassam A.
    ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2021, 52 (04) : 335 - 346
  • [30] Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a comparative study of stem revision versus internal fixation with plate
    Spina M.
    Scalvi A.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2018, 28 (6) : 1133 - 1142