Plain films are not accurate in planning internal fixation in vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures and in distinguishing between subtypes B1 And B2

被引:2
|
作者
Cinotti, Gianluca [1 ]
Sinno, Ennio [1 ]
Fornara, Gianluca [1 ]
LaTorre, Giuseppe [2 ]
Giannicola, Giuseppe [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Anat Histol Forens Med & Orthopaed Sci, Piazzale Aldo Moro, I-00185 Rome 5, Italy
[2] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Publ Hlth & Infect Dis, Piazzale Aldo Moro, I-00185 Rome 5, Italy
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2021年 / 52卷 / 06期
关键词
Peri-prosthetic fracture; Vancouver Type B; Total hip; Femoral osteosynthesis; REVISION HIP; CLASSIFICATION; ARTHROPLASTY; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; FEMUR;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2020.12.013
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: While few studies analysed the diagnostic validity of preoperative radiographs in distinguishing between Vancouver type B1 and B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs), no investigation has been conducted to assess the degree of diagnostic validity of preoperative radiographs in identifying the fracture course and planning the most appropriate treatment. We analysed the diagnostic validity of radiographs in detecting the fracture course and stem stability in Vancouver type B PFFs. Methods: Vancouver type B PFFs with different fracture courses were randomly performed in 36 dried cadaveric femurs in which a femoral broach had previously been implanted. Radiographic images, taken in the coronal and sagittal views, were analysed by 5 orthopaedic surgeons and 2 radiologists who were asked to reproduce the fracture course and to evaluate stem stability. A scoring system was used to determine the injured femoral cortex correctly identified by the examiners. Results: The identification of the fracture course was scored as poor in 52.4% and 56.%, fair in 23% and 23.4% and good in 24.6% and 19.8%, The identification of the fracture course in the coronal and axial vies radiographs was scored in coronal and axial view radiographs respectively. There was no significant difference in the average score obtained by senior and young examiners. In the coronal plane, the fracture course was poorly identified by all examiners in 11 (30.5%) femurs and by 5 or more examiners in 17 (47%). The fracture course was correctly identified by 5 or more examiners in 8 femurs (22%). A vertical fracture involving an emidiaphysis was found in 8 of the 11 femurs in which the PFF was poorly diagnosed by all examiners. Stem instability was correctly diagnosed in 45% of cases. Conclusions: In type B PFFs preoperative radiographs show a reduced diagnostic validity in identifying the fracture course and, hence, in planning a correct treatment. Potentially unstable vertical fractures involving an emidiaphysis are likely to be poorly diagnosed since most of the fracture course is hidden by the femoral stem. In cementless stems the diagnostic validity of radiographs in diagnosing between Vancouver type B1 and B2 seems to be lower than that reported for cemented stems. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1592 / 1596
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture - A Biomechanical Comparison Between Vancouver Type B1 and B2 Fixation Methods
    Moazen, Mehran
    Mak, Jonathan H.
    Etchels, Lee W.
    Jin, Zhongmin
    Wilcox, Ruth K.
    Jones, Alison C.
    Tsiridis, Eleftherios
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (03): : 495 - 500
  • [2] Plate Osteosynthesis in Vancouver Type B1 and B2 Periprosthetic Fractures
    Fousek, J.
    Vasek, P.
    ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2009, 76 (05) : 410 - 416
  • [3] Osteosynthesis in Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic fractures
    Roche-Albero, Adrian
    Mateo-Agudo, Jesus
    Martin-Hernandez, Carlos
    Arnaudas-Casanueva, Maria
    Gil-Albarova, Jorge
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2021, 52 (08): : 2451 - 2458
  • [4] Impact of bone health on the mechanics of plate fixation for Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures
    Chen, Xiang
    Myers, Casey A.
    Clary, Chadd W.
    Varga, Peter
    Coombs, Dana
    DeWall, Ryan J.
    Fritz, Bryan
    Rullkoetter, Paul J.
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2022, 100
  • [5] Optimizing Proximal Fixation in Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures
    Yevtukh, Alexander
    Taylor, Aaron
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 33 (02)
  • [6] Isolated locked compression plating for Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures
    Bryant, Ginger K.
    Morshed, Saam
    Agel, Julie
    Henley, M. Bradford
    Barei, David P.
    Taitsman, Lisa A.
    Nork, Sean E.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2009, 40 (11): : 1180 - 1186
  • [7] Surgical Fixation of Vancouver Type B1 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review
    Dehghan, Niloofar
    McKee, Michael D.
    Nauth, Aaron
    Ristevski, Bill
    Schemitsch, Emil H.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2014, 28 (12) : 721 - 727
  • [8] The impact of stem fixation method on Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture management
    Wang, Katherine
    Kenanidis, Eustathios
    Gamie, Zakareya
    Suleman, Khurram
    Miodownik, Mark
    Avadi, Mahsa
    Horne, David
    Thompson, Jonathan
    Tsiridis, Eleftherios
    Moazen, Mehran
    SICOT-J, 2022, 8
  • [9] Locking plate fixation for Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a critical analysis of 135 cases
    Graham, Simon M.
    Moazen, Mehran
    Leonidou, Andreas
    Tsiridis, Eleftherios
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2013, 18 (03) : 426 - 436
  • [10] Outcome after operative treatment of Vancouver type B1 and C periprosthetic femoral fractures: open reduction and internal fixation versus revision arthroplasty
    Laurer, Helmut L.
    Wutzler, Sebastian
    Possner, Susann
    Geiger, Emanuel V.
    El Saman, Andre
    Marzi, Ingo
    Frank, Johannes
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2011, 131 (07) : 983 - 989