Plain films are not accurate in planning internal fixation in vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures and in distinguishing between subtypes B1 And B2

被引:2
作者
Cinotti, Gianluca [1 ]
Sinno, Ennio [1 ]
Fornara, Gianluca [1 ]
LaTorre, Giuseppe [2 ]
Giannicola, Giuseppe [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Anat Histol Forens Med & Orthopaed Sci, Piazzale Aldo Moro, I-00185 Rome 5, Italy
[2] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Publ Hlth & Infect Dis, Piazzale Aldo Moro, I-00185 Rome 5, Italy
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2021年 / 52卷 / 06期
关键词
Peri-prosthetic fracture; Vancouver Type B; Total hip; Femoral osteosynthesis; REVISION HIP; CLASSIFICATION; ARTHROPLASTY; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; FEMUR;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2020.12.013
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: While few studies analysed the diagnostic validity of preoperative radiographs in distinguishing between Vancouver type B1 and B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs), no investigation has been conducted to assess the degree of diagnostic validity of preoperative radiographs in identifying the fracture course and planning the most appropriate treatment. We analysed the diagnostic validity of radiographs in detecting the fracture course and stem stability in Vancouver type B PFFs. Methods: Vancouver type B PFFs with different fracture courses were randomly performed in 36 dried cadaveric femurs in which a femoral broach had previously been implanted. Radiographic images, taken in the coronal and sagittal views, were analysed by 5 orthopaedic surgeons and 2 radiologists who were asked to reproduce the fracture course and to evaluate stem stability. A scoring system was used to determine the injured femoral cortex correctly identified by the examiners. Results: The identification of the fracture course was scored as poor in 52.4% and 56.%, fair in 23% and 23.4% and good in 24.6% and 19.8%, The identification of the fracture course in the coronal and axial vies radiographs was scored in coronal and axial view radiographs respectively. There was no significant difference in the average score obtained by senior and young examiners. In the coronal plane, the fracture course was poorly identified by all examiners in 11 (30.5%) femurs and by 5 or more examiners in 17 (47%). The fracture course was correctly identified by 5 or more examiners in 8 femurs (22%). A vertical fracture involving an emidiaphysis was found in 8 of the 11 femurs in which the PFF was poorly diagnosed by all examiners. Stem instability was correctly diagnosed in 45% of cases. Conclusions: In type B PFFs preoperative radiographs show a reduced diagnostic validity in identifying the fracture course and, hence, in planning a correct treatment. Potentially unstable vertical fractures involving an emidiaphysis are likely to be poorly diagnosed since most of the fracture course is hidden by the femoral stem. In cementless stems the diagnostic validity of radiographs in diagnosing between Vancouver type B1 and B2 seems to be lower than that reported for cemented stems. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1592 / 1596
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   The reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification of femoral fractures after hip replacement [J].
Brady, OH ;
Garbuz, DS ;
Masri, BA ;
Duncan, CP .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2000, 15 (01) :59-62
[2]   Locking compression plate fixation of Vancouver type-b1 periprosthetic femoral fractures [J].
Buttaro, M. A. ;
Farfalli, G. ;
Nunez, M. Paredes ;
Comba, F. ;
Piccaluga, F. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A (09) :1964-1969
[3]   Cable plate fixation for Vancouver Type-B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures-Our experience and identification of a subset at risk of non-union [J].
Chakrabarti, Dip ;
Thokur, Niyamathullah ;
Ajnin, Serajdin .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2019, 50 (12) :2301-2305
[4]   An algorithm for the surgical treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the femur around a well-fixed femoral component [J].
Corten, K. ;
Vanrykel, F. ;
Bellemans, J. ;
Frederix, P. Reynders ;
Simon, J. -P. ;
Broos, P. L. O. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2009, 91B (11) :1424-1430
[5]   Survivorship After Periprosthetic Femur Fracture: Factors Affecting Outcome [J].
Drew, Jacob M. ;
Griffin, William L. ;
Odum, Susan M. ;
Van Doren, Bryce ;
Weston, Brock T. ;
Stryker, Louis S. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (06) :1283-1288
[6]   Periprosthetic femoral fractures-incidence, classification problems and the proposal of a modified classification scheme [J].
Frenzel, Stephan ;
Vecsei, Vilmos ;
Negrin, Lukas .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 39 (10) :1909-1920
[7]   Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030 [J].
Kurtz, Steven ;
Ong, Kevin ;
Lau, Edmund ;
Mowat, Fionna ;
Halpern, Michael .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A (04) :780-785
[8]   MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174
[9]   Reliability and Validity of the Vancouver Classification in Periprosthetic Fractures Around Cementless Femoral Stems [J].
Lee, Shanjean ;
Kagan, Ryland ;
Wang, Lian ;
Doung, Yee-Cheen .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (07) :S277-S281
[10]   Three hundred and twenty-one periprosthetic femoral fractures [J].
Lindahl, Hans ;
Garellick, Goran ;
Regner, Hans ;
Herberts, Peter ;
Malchau, Henrik .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2006, 88A (06) :1215-1222