The Effects of Newer Antidepressants on Occupational Impairment in Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:10
作者
Evans, Vanessa C. [1 ,2 ]
Alamian, Golnoush [1 ,2 ]
McLeod, Jane [1 ,2 ]
Woo, Cindy [1 ,2 ]
Yatham, Lakshmi N. [1 ,2 ]
Lam, Raymond W. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Psychiat, 2255 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 2A1, Canada
[2] Djavad Mowafaghian Ctr Brain Hlth, Mood Disorders Ctr Excellence, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
FUNCTIONAL STATUS QUESTIONNAIRE; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; LONG-TERM COURSE; DOUBLE-BLIND; 50; MG/DAY; PSYCHOSOCIAL DISABILITY; SOCIAL-ADJUSTMENT; ADULT OUTPATIENTS; WORK PRODUCTIVITY; EXTENDED-RELEASE;
D O I
10.1007/s40263-016-0334-7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and objectives A substantial proportion of the disease burden of major depressive disorder (MDD) results from impairments in occupational functioning, including disability and reduced productivity. Accumulating evidence suggests that antidepressants can improve functional as well as symptomatic outcomes in patients with MDD. We examined the treatment effects of newer antidepressants on occupational impairment in MDD, based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov for the period 1 January 1992 to 15 June 2015 to identify RCTs of newer antidepressants (excluding tricyclic antidepressants and monoamine oxidase inhibitors), with or without a placebo condition, that included a validated measure of occupational functioning in patients with MDD. Abstracts were scanned for eligibility by two independent reviewers and investigators of unpublished studies were contacted to obtain data. Study data were extracted and double-entered for accuracy. We selected the Sheehan Disability Scale Work/School subscale (SDS-Work) for the meta-analysis because it was the most consistently used assessment of occupational impairment. Analysis employed a random-effects model. Results The systematic review initially identified 42 RCTs but only 28 (67 %) had data on occupational outcomes that were published or obtained from investigators. The SDS-Work subscale was used in 25 of 28 trials; five other assessments of occupational functioning were used in seven trials. Data were synthesized from 17 placebo-controlled studies (n = 7031) that used the SDS-Work subscale. Antidepressants (n = 4722) were significantly superior to placebo (n = 2309) in improving SDS-Work scores at 8 weeks, with a mean difference of 0.73 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.60-0.86] and a standardized mean difference of 0.28 (95 % CI 0.23-0.33), representing small effects. Limitations Few included trials reported on the employment status of their samples, and most trials were of short-term treatment duration (8-12 weeks). Several RCTs that collected data on occupational outcomes were also excluded from the review and meta-analysis because their data were unpublished and unobtainable. Conclusions Our meta-analysis suggests that newer antidepressants have a small, positive impact on occupational impairment in the short-term, but the clinical significance of this impact is questionable. To improve assessment of this important outcome, future research studies should use more comprehensive measures of occupational functioning, productivity and impairment, and longer treatment durations.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 417
页数:13
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [21] Endicott J, 1997, PSYCHOPHARMACOL BULL, V33, P13
  • [22] The Impact of Individual Depressive Symptoms on Impairment of Psychosocial Functioning
    Fried, Eiko I.
    Nesse, Randolph M.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (02):
  • [23] A randomized placebo-controlled trial of duloxetine in patients with major depressive disorder and associated painful physical
    Gaynor, Paula J.
    Gopal, Murali
    Zheng, Wei
    Martinez, James M.
    Robinson, Michael J.
    Marangell, Lauren B.
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2011, 27 (10) : 1849 - 1858
  • [24] Duloxetine versus placebo in the treatment of major depressive disorder and associated painful physical symptoms: a replication study
    Gaynor, Paula J.
    Gopal, Murali
    Zheng, Wei
    Martinez, James M.
    Robinson, Michael J.
    Hann, Danette
    Marangell, Lauren B.
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2011, 27 (10) : 1859 - 1867
  • [25] The History and Current State of Antidepressant Clinical Trial Design: A Call to Action for Proof-of-Concept Studies
    Gelenberg, Alan J.
    Thase, Michael E.
    Meyer, Roger E.
    Goodwin, Frederick K.
    Katz, Martin M.
    Kraemer, Helena Chmura
    Potter, William Z.
    Shelton, Richard C.
    Fava, Maurizio
    Khan, Arif
    Trivedi, Madhukar H.
    Ninan, Philip T.
    Mann, John J.
    Bergeson, Susan
    Endicott, Jean
    Kocsis, James H.
    Leon, Andrew C.
    Manji, Husseini K.
    Rosenbaum, Jerrold F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 69 (10) : 1513 - +
  • [26] MAOI TREATMENT RESPONSE - MULTIAXIAL ASSESSMENT
    GILLER, E
    BIALOS, D
    RIDDLE, MA
    WALDO, MC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 1988, 14 (02) : 171 - 175
  • [27] Gilmour Heather, 2007, Health Rep, V18, P9
  • [28] Social adjustment in depressed patients treated with venlafaxine and amitriptyline
    Gorenstein, C
    Andrade, L
    Moreno, RA
    Artes, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 17 (04) : 171 - 175
  • [29] Defining and Measuring Functional Recovery from Depression
    Greer, Tracy L.
    Kurian, Benji T.
    Trivedi, Madhukar H.
    [J]. CNS DRUGS, 2010, 24 (04) : 267 - 284
  • [30] Eight-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind comparison of the antidepressant efficacy and tolerability of bupropion XR and venlafaxine XR
    Hewett, K.
    Chrzanowski, W.
    Schmitz, M.
    Savela, A.
    Milanova, V.
    Gee, M.
    Krishen, A.
    Millen, L.
    Leary, M. O.
    Modell, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 23 (05) : 531 - 538