Validation of the reliability of the Thai version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ)

被引:8
作者
Witayakom, Witchaporn [1 ]
Paholpak, Permsak [1 ]
Jirarattanaphochai, Kitti [1 ]
Kosuwon, Weerachai [1 ]
Sirichativapee, Winai [1 ]
Wisanuyotin, Taweechok [1 ]
Laupattarakasem, Pat [1 ]
Sukhonthamarn, Kamolsak [1 ]
Jeeravipoolvarn, Polasak [1 ]
Sakakibara, Toshihiko [2 ]
Kasai, Yuichi [2 ]
机构
[1] Khon Kaen Univ, Fac Med, Dept Orthoped, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
[2] Mie Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Spinal Surg & Biomed Engn, Tsu, Mie 514, Japan
关键词
CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; OUTCOME MEASURE; HEALTH SURVEY; PART; ESTABLISHMENT; VALIDITY; QUALITY; SCORES; SF-36; ITEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jos.2015.12.017
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) was developed to resolve problems associated with the original evaluation of cervical myelopathic patients. The aim of this study was to translate the JOACMEQ into Thai as per international recommendations, and to test its reliability and validity in the Thai context Methods: The JOACMEQ was translated into Thai, using international guidelines. Cervical myelopathy patients (n = 70; 31 males) were asked to complete the Thai version JOACMEQ twice (4 weeks apart). Test-retest reliability was analyzed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Internal consistencies were analyzed using Cronbach's alpha, while the construct validity was compared with the Thai version modified SF-36; using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Results: The Thai JOACMEQ produced good reliability (i.e., the ICC was >0.9 in 2 parameters and >0.8 in one). Overall the Cronbach's a for the 24 questions showed very high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0.8) and almost all Cronbach's a showed satisfactory internal consistency except for bladder function. The Spearman's rank correlation for all the JOACMEQ parameters had a positive correlation with all Thai SF 36 subscales, especially the quality of life parameter, which showed a strong correlation with all SF-36 subscales. Conclusion: The Thai version of the JOACMEQ had satisfactory internal consistency and test-retest reliability: it also had good construct validity. It can therefore be used as a reliable tool for assessing quality of life for cervical myelopathy patients in Thailand. (C) 2016 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 127
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Translation and validation of the Japanese version of the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire version A
    Takegata, Mizuki
    Haruna, Megumi
    Matsuzaki, Masayo
    Shiraishi, Mie
    Murayama, Ryoko
    Okano, Tadaharu
    Severinsson, Elisabeth
    NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2013, 15 (03) : 326 - 332
  • [42] Reliability and validation of the Thai version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT-THA)
    Yingyongsaksri, Supannikar
    Hiller, Claire E.
    Tharawadeepimuk, Kittichai
    Nanbancha, Ampika
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 45 (22) : 3762 - 3767
  • [43] The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire: A Turkish validation study
    Aksekili, Mehmet Atif Erol
    Aktekin, Lale
    Korkmazer, Selcuk
    Akyol, Mesut
    Kilicarslan, Kasim
    Tosun, Nihat
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2016, 21 (06) : 718 - 722
  • [44] Reliability of the Thai Version of the Motion Sickness Susceptibility Questionnaire Short-Form
    Asawavichienjinda, Thanin
    Patarapak, Saowaros
    AEROSPACE MEDICINE AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 2019, 90 (01) : 26 - 31
  • [45] Reliability and Validation of the Japanese Version of the Patient Empowerment Scale
    Tsubouchi, Yoshihito
    Tainosho, Akiyoshi
    Shimomura, Koudai
    Yorozuya, Kyosuke
    Kou, Motoasa
    Tsubouchi, Rie
    Tanaka, Hiroyuki
    Naito, Yasuo
    HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (06)
  • [46] Development and Validation of the Japanese Version of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire
    Yoshinori Sugiura
    Atsushi Sato
    Yoshinori Ito
    Hiroki Murakami
    Mindfulness, 2012, 3 : 85 - 94
  • [47] Comparison of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) Score and Modified JOA (mJOA) Score for the Assessment of Cervical Myelopathy: A Multicenter Observational Study
    Kato, So
    Oshima, Yasushi
    Oka, Hiroyuki
    Chikuda, Hirotaka
    Takeshita, Yujiro
    Miyoshi, Kota
    Kawamura, Naohiro
    Masuda, Kazuhiro
    Kunogi, Junichi
    Okazaki, Rentaro
    Azuma, Seiichi
    Hara, Nobuhiro
    Tanaka, Sakae
    Takeshita, Katsushi
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (04):
  • [48] Development and Validation of the Japanese Version of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire
    Sugiura, Yoshinori
    Sato, Atsushi
    Ito, Yoshinori
    Murakami, Hiroki
    MINDFULNESS, 2012, 3 (02) : 85 - 94
  • [49] Validity and reliability of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score for osteoarthritic knees
    Okuda, Masayoshi
    Omokawa, Shohei
    Okahashi, Kohjiro
    Akahane, Manabu
    Tanaka, Yasuhito
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2012, 17 (06) : 750 - 756
  • [50] Measurement of equivalence between the web and paper versions of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire
    Takegami, Yasuhiko
    Seki, Taisuke
    Higuchi, Yoshitoshi
    Osawa, Yusuke
    Ishiguro, Naoki
    MODERN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2020, 30 (02) : 397 - 401