ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE APPRAISAL OF THE ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE OF URBAN REGENERATION PROJECTS EXEMPLIFIED BY THE JESSICA INITIATIVE

被引:2
作者
Idczak, Piotr [1 ]
Musialkowska, Ida [1 ]
Mrozik, Karol [2 ]
机构
[1] Poznan Univ Econ & Business, Poznan, Poland
[2] Poznan Univ Life Sci, Poznan, Poland
来源
EKONOMIA I SRODOWISKO-ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT | 2019年 / 3卷 / 70期
关键词
urban ecosystem services; environmental externalities; economic performance; urban regeneration; JESSICA initiative; EXTERNALITIES;
D O I
10.34659/2019/3/38
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to indicate the valuation importance of externalities derived from the urban ecosystem services (UES) in terms of their applicability in the appraisal process of urban regeneration projects co-financed from European funds. Specifically, it examines the impact of UES on the project's economic performance, and thereby on human quality of life. Using the discounted cash flow method, this paper estimates the project's economic performance indicators including the identified UES upon their prior valuation. The valuation was carried out on the basis of the benefit analysis, contingent valuation method - "willingness to pay" - and benefit transfer method, as recommended by Bernaciak, Wojcieszak (2014) and Zawojska et al. (2016). Results show that urban projects including UES are characterised by the higher values of the economic performance indicators and they should be assessed higher than projects with little or no UES because of their stronger contribution to the sustainable development of urban areas. In spite of the fact that there are limitations due to the UES valuation techniques used in the study, the presented approach could be an important tool for the project's appraisal.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 129
页数:16
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, swiadczenia ekosystemowe w krajobrazie mlodo- glacjalnym. Ocena potencjalu i wykorzystania.
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Publications Office of the European Union (Issue December), DOI [DOI 10.2776/97516, 10.2776/97516]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, INT SUST URB DEV COH
[4]  
[Anonymous], EKONOMIA SRODOWISKO
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Tecnical Report, DOI [10.2800/88266, DOI 10.2800/88266]
[6]  
[Atkinson G. OECD. OECD.], 2018, Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment
[7]  
Bernaciak A., 2014, EC ENV, V51, P187
[8]   What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units [J].
Boyd, James ;
Banzhaf, Spencer .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 63 (2-3) :616-626
[9]   An economic-ecological model of urban growth and urban externalities: empirical evidence from Italy [J].
Capello, R ;
Faggian, A .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 40 (02) :181-198
[10]   DEVELOPMENT BASED ON CARRYING-CAPACITY - A STRATEGY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION [J].
CAREY, DI .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 1993, 3 (02) :140-148