How to identify the take-over criticality in conditionally automated driving? An examination using drivers' physiological parameters and situational factors

被引:19
|
作者
Yi, Binlin [1 ]
Cao, Haotian [1 ]
Song, Xiaolin [1 ]
Zhao, Song [2 ]
Guo, Wenfeng [1 ]
Li, Mingjun [1 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, State Key Lab Adv Design & Mfg Vehicle Body, 2 Lushan South Rd, Changsha 410082, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Waterloo, Dept Mech & Mechatron Engn, 200 Univ Ave W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Conditionally automated driving; Transition of control; Takeover criticality; Situational factors; Physiological responses; STRESS DETECTION; MENTAL WORKLOAD; PUPIL-DILATION; BEHAVIOR; PERFORMANCE; RESPONSES; EMOTIONS; TIME; CONSEQUENCES; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.trf.2021.12.007
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Autonomous vehicles and advanced driver assistance technology are growing exponentially, and vehicles equipped with conditional automation, which has features like Traffic Jam Pilot and Highway Assist, are already available in the market. And this could expose the driver to a stressful driving condition during the takeover mission. To identify stressful takeover situations and better interact with automated systems, the relationship and effect between drivers' physiological responses, situational factors (e.g., takeover request [TOR] lead time, takeover frequencies, and scenario types), and takeover criticality were investigated.34 participants were involved in a series of takeover events in a simulated driving environment, which are varied by different TOR lead time conditions and driving scenes. The situational factors, drivers' skin conductance (SC), heart rate (HR), gaze behaviors, and takeover criticality ratings were collected and analyzed. The results indicated that drivers had a higher takeover criticality rating when they experienced a shorter TOR lead time level or at first to fourth take-overs. Besides, drivers who encountered a dynamic obstacle reported higher takeover criticality ratings when they were at the same Time to collision (TTC). We also observed that the takeover situations of higher criticality have larger driver's maximum HR, mean pupil size, and maximum change in the SC (relative to the initial value of a takeover stage). Those findings of situational factors and physiological responses can provide additional support for the designing of adaptive alert systems and environmental soothing technology in conditionally automated driving, which will improve the takeover performances and drivers' experience.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 178
页数:18
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [21] Effects of In-Vehicle Touchscreen Location on Driver Task Performance, Eye Gaze Behavior, and Workload During Conditionally Automated Driving: Nondriving-Related Task and Take-Over
    Ban, Gayoung
    Park, Woojin
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2024, 66 (12) : 2651 - 2668
  • [22] Effect of cognitive load on drivers ' State and task performance during automated driving: Introducing a novel method for determining stabilisation time following take-over of control
    Melnicuk, Vadim
    Thompson, Simon
    Jennings, Paul
    Birrell, Stewart
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2021, 151
  • [23] How human-automation interaction experiences, trust propensity and dynamic trust affect drivers' physiological responses in conditionally automated driving: Moderated moderated-mediation analyses
    Yi, Binlin
    Cao, Haotian
    Song, Xiaolin
    Wang, Jianqiang
    Guo, Wenfeng
    Huang, Zhi
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2023, 94 : 133 - 150
  • [24] How Can the Trust-Change Direction be Measured and Identified During Takeover Transitions in Conditionally Automated Driving? Using Physiological Responses and Takeover-Related Factors
    Yi, Binlin
    Cao, Haotian
    Song, Xiaolin
    Wang, Jianqiang
    Zhao, Song
    Guo, Wenfeng
    Cao, Dongpu
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2024, 66 (04) : 1276 - 1301