Resilient behavior of compacted subgrade soils under the repeated triaxial test

被引:71
作者
Kim, Daehyeon
Kim, Jong Ryeol
机构
[1] INDOT, Res & Dev, W Lafayette, IN 47906 USA
[2] Chonnam Natl Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Kwangju 500757, South Korea
关键词
resilient modulus; silty-clay soils; predictive model; soil properties; regression coefficients; permanent deformation;
D O I
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.07.006
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Subgrade soils are very important materials to support highways. Resilient modulus (M,) has been used for characterizing stress-strain behavior of subgrades subjected to repeated traffic loadings. Recently the repeated triaxial test procedure has been upgraded through AASHTO T 307. Since the testing procedure is still complex, the testing has not been widely implemented in practice. In order to evaluate resilient behavior of compacted subgrades soils, the repeated triaxial test and the unconfined compressive test as well as some fundamental property tests were conducted. In this study, the applicability of a simplified procedure with a confining pressure of 13.8 kPa and deviator stresses of 13.8, 27.6, 41.4, 55.2, 69 and 103.4 kPa was investigated on the typical sandy-silty-clay and silty-clay subgrade soils encountered in Indiana. The results obtained from the simplified procedure are comparable with those obtained from AASHTO T 307 which calls for 15 combinations of stresses. This shows the simplified procedure to be feasible and effective for design purpose. Some soils compacted wet of optimum moisture content showed an excessive permanent deformation. This phenomenon was investigated by the comparison of the unconfined compressive test and the repeated triaxial test results. For soils exhibiting excessive permanent deformation, use of deformed length is desirable for more accurate calculation of M-r. Usually the soils compacted dry of optimum shows the largest M-r for sandy-silty-clay soils due to capillary suction, but it is not necessarily true for silty-clay soils. A predictive model to estimate regression coefficients k(1), k(2), and k(3) using 11 soil variables obtained from the soil property tests and the standard Proctor compaction tests was developed. The predicted regression coefficients compare well with measured ones. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1470 / 1479
页数:10
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
ALTSCHAEFFL AG, 1998, FHWAINJTRP982 PURD U
[2]  
Drumm E.C., 1990, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering-ASCE, V116, P775
[3]   Subgrade resilient modulus correction for saturation effects [J].
Drumm, EC ;
Reeves, JS ;
Madgett, MR ;
Trolinger, WD .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 1997, 123 (07) :663-670
[4]  
ELLIOT RP, 1988, TRANSPORT RES REC, V1196, P1
[5]  
Elliott R.P., 1988, TRANSPORTATION RES R, V1192, P1
[6]  
Houston W. N., 1993, TRANSPORT RES REC, P124
[7]   Effects of supersingle tire loadings on pavements [J].
Kim, D ;
Salgado, R ;
Altschaeffl, AG .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, 2005, 131 (10) :732-743
[8]   Alternative method of determining resilient modulus of subgrade soils using a static triaxial test [J].
Kim, DS ;
Kweon, GC ;
Lee, KH .
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 38 (01) :107-116
[9]   Resilient modulus of cohesive soils [J].
Lee, W ;
Bohra, NC ;
Altschaeffl, AG ;
White, TD .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 1997, 123 (02) :131-136
[10]  
LEE W, 1995, J T ENG ASCE, V12, P502