Intersentential syntactic context effects on comprehension: the role of working memory

被引:30
作者
Vos, SH
Friederici, AD [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Cognit Neurosci, Leipzig, Germany
[2] FC Donders Ctr Cognit Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Nijmegen Inst Cognit & Informat, Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH | 2003年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
language; syntax; working memory; ERP;
D O I
10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00226-4
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The study investigated the influence of a syntactically biasing context sentence on the processing of syntactically complex object-first relative clauses and even more complex object-first complement clauses in readers with individual differences in working memory. Behavioral as well as brain responses (event-related potentials, ERPs) were recorded from two groups of participants with either a high or a low working memory span. The behavioral data taken from a post-sentence comprehension question task indicate an intersentential syntactic contextual influence on the comprehension of object-first relative clauses for low span readers, but not for high span readers. The on-line ERP measures taken at the disambiguating item revealed for the high span readers a main effect of structure (subject-versus object-first) i.e., a P600, independent of context. Low span readers, in contrast, did not show any P600 structure effect. Thus, the combined data indicate a differential context effect on sentence comprehension in low and high span readers. High span readers parse the incoming information independent of intersentential context, whereas low span readers use the intersentential context off-line. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 122
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   INTERACTION WITH CONTEXT DURING HUMAN SENTENCE PROCESSING [J].
ALTMANN, G ;
STEEDMAN, M .
COGNITION, 1988, 30 (03) :191-238
[2]  
Altmann Gerry., 1989, LANG COGNITIVE PROC, V4, P105, DOI DOI 10.1080/01690968908406365
[3]   EFFECTS OF SYNTAX IN HUMAN SENTENCE PARSING - EVIDENCE AGAINST A STRUCTURE-BASED PROPOSAL MECHANISM [J].
ALTMANN, GTM ;
GARNHAM, A ;
HENSTRA, J .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1994, 20 (01) :209-216
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1987, MODULARITY KNOWLEDGE
[5]  
[Anonymous], PERSPECTIVES SENTENC
[6]   PARSING IN DISCOURSE - CONTEXT EFFECTS AND THEIR LIMITS [J].
BRITT, MA ;
PERFETTI, CA ;
GARROD, S ;
RAYNER, K .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1992, 31 (03) :293-314
[7]   THE INTERACTION OF REFERENTIAL AMBIGUITY AND ARGUMENT STRUCTURE IN THE PARSING OF PREPOSITIONAL PHRASES [J].
BRITT, MA .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1994, 33 (02) :251-283
[8]   Ambiguity in Context [J].
Clifton, Charles, Jr. ;
Ferreira, Fernanda .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 1989, 4 (3-4) :SI77-SI103
[9]   Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis [J].
Daneman, M ;
Merikle, PM .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1996, 3 (04) :422-433
[10]   INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN WORKING MEMORY AND READING [J].
DANEMAN, M ;
CARPENTER, PA .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1980, 19 (04) :450-466