The optical trapezoid model: A novel approach to remote sensing of soil moisture applied to Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 observations

被引:304
作者
Sadeghi, Morteza [1 ]
Babaeian, Ebrahim [2 ]
Tuller, Markus [2 ]
Jones, Scott B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Utah State Univ, Dept Plants Soils & Climate, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Soil Water & Environm Sci, Tucson, AZ USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Satellite remote sensing; Soil moisture; Surface reflectance; Sentinel-2; Landsat-8; LAND-SURFACE TEMPERATURE; DIFFERENCE VEGETATION INDEX; WATER-CONTENT ESTIMATION; DIGITAL COUNT DATA; ROOT-ZONE; THERMAL INERTIA; TRIANGLE METHOD; ENERGY FLUXES; DROUGHT INDEX; STRESS INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.rse.2017.05.041
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The "trapezoid" or "triangle" model constitutes the most popular approach to remote sensing (RS) of surface soil moisture based on coupled thermal (Le., land surface temperature) and optical RS observations. The model, hereinafter referred to as Thermal-OptiCal TRAapezoid Model (TOTRAM), is based on interpretation of the pixel distribution within the land surface temperature - vegetation index (LST-VI) space. TOTRAM suffers from two inherent limitations. It is not applicable to satellites that do not provide thermal data (e.g., Sentinel-2) and it requires parameterization for each individual observation date. To overcome these restrictions we propose a novel Optical TRApezoid Model (OPTRAM), which is based on the linear physical relationship between soil moisture and shortwave infrared transformed reflectance (SIR) and is parameterized based on the pixel distribution within the SIR-VI space. The OPTRAM-based surface soil moisture estimates derived from Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 observations for the Walnut Gulch and Little Washita watersheds were compared with ground truth soil moisture data. Results indicate that the prediction accuracies of OPTRAM and TOTRAM are comparable, with OPTRAM only requiring observations in the optical electromagnetic frequency domain. The volumetric moisture content estimation errors of both models were below 0.04 cm(3) cm(-3) with local calibration and about 0.04-0.05 cm(3) cm(-3) without calibration. We also demonstrate that OPTRAM only requires a single universal parameterization for a given location, which is a significant advancement that opens a new avenue for remote sensing of soil moisture. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 68
页数:17
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
Ahmad A., 2011, SPIE REV, V2, P28001, DOI DOI 10.1117/1.3534910
[2]   Two new soil moisture indices based on the NIR-red triangle space of Landsat-8 data [J].
Amani, Meisam ;
Parsian, Saeid ;
MirMazloumi, S. Mohammad ;
Aieneh, Omid .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2016, 50 :176-186
[3]   Temperature dynamics during nonisothermal evaporation from drying porous surfaces [J].
Aminzadeh, M. ;
Or, D. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2013, 49 (11) :7339-7349
[4]   Soil moisture prediction of bare soil profiles using diffuse spectral reflectance information and vadose zone flow modeling [J].
Babaeian, E. ;
Homaee, M. ;
Montzka, C. ;
Vereecken, H. ;
Norouzi, A. A. ;
van Genuchten, M. Th. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 187 :218-229
[5]  
Carlson T.N., 1994, Remote Sens. Rev, V9, P161, DOI DOI 10.1080/02757259409532220
[6]  
Carlson T.N., 2013, Int. J. Remote Sens. Appl, V3, P155
[7]   An overview of the "triangle method" for estimating surface evapotranspiration and soil moisture from satellite imagery [J].
Carlson, Toby .
SENSORS, 2007, 7 (08) :1612-1629
[8]   Detecting vegetation leaf water content using reflectance in the optical domain [J].
Ceccato, P ;
Flasse, S ;
Tarantola, S ;
Jacquemoud, S ;
Grégoire, JM .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 77 (01) :22-33
[9]  
Ceccato P, 2002, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V82, P198, DOI [10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00036-6, 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00037-8]
[10]   Vegetation water content estimation for corn and soybeans using spectral indices derived from MODIS near- and short-wave infrared bands [J].
Chen, DY ;
Huang, JF ;
Jackson, TJ .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 98 (2-3) :225-236